Please tell me something IMPORTANT TO YOU that you DISLIKE about your own party.
I'm an independent--Don't like Democrates push it thru attitude---Republicans---not fighting hard enough to give the people what they want
The platform on the Republican party should not include "Pro Life". It is already amended to the constitution and should be a done deal. I am a Republican, but would like not to continue the discussion on this issue which divids the party.
They are too meek - they won, make some change! kick some ass!
I'm an Independant. And there ain't a dimes bit of difference between a Republican and a Democrat.
That the Democrats are trying to pass a health bill that the people do not want.
I dislike the fact that democrats keep insisting on one single thing instead of moving on. They are afraid of speaking out
Nobody is looking to create jobs in this Country
I am an Independent voter, but the Democrats and Republicans both are out of touch, arrogant and do not do their jobs representing the people. They a self-absorbed IDIOTS.
I don't have a party. From the perspective of the Libertarian Party, I dislike that they're not serious about anything; from the perspective of either Republicans or Democrats, I dislike that they're not libertarian.
I hate their idea that they have to present supposedly moderate Republicans to win over the undecided voters. If they'd just stick to conservative policies they'd win.
I consider myself an independent and find it frustrating that only the two major parties are taken seriously, thus requiring many to abandon some beliefs in favor of others.
I'm a Democrat - I don't like that they aren't showing an ability to govern with majorities in 2 branches of government, including both branches of Congress. They can't pass a healthcare bill.
nothing i don't associate myself with any party...i am who i am and i feel how i feel...
I am not into politics so I can't really tell you anything
Too "old" and "stodgy"--they need people who reflect those of us under the age of 60.
Probably the thing I dislike the most is applicable to both (all) parties: saying things/making promises to get voters to vote for the individual but not following through if they get elected.
I feel that spending is out of control - I like the concept of 'pay as you go' and I believen spending has to come under control so that the deficit doesn't keep growing
don't always stand up for conservative principles
They don't want to go against the insurance companies and consider universal health coverage.
the leaders of my party are turning adefe ear to the voters.
not being open minded and should bend a little.
Republican party does not always act financialy conservative enough.
Unrealistic campaign promises. Anyone who says they won't raise taxes, especially when they are promising expensive programs.
That we are too corgial to kick the Democrats in their own asses for the downright illegal activity they practice on a daily basis.
the fact that everyone seems to think that they have to agree by party lines. I want independent thinkers that think on their own.
I am a registered independent, so I don't realy have a party. However, being closer to the democrats, I was not pleased when they removed the public option from health care reform
I am not a registered voter any longer. I was registered a democrate only because my family were democrates, but I am actually disenchanted with both parties.
Right to life issue. Sometimes they're TOO conservative
I am not happy with the curent leadership
have moved too slowly on health care reform
The amount of money spent - far too much wasted spending.
The Democrats are not ending the wars soon enough!
The greed and egos got to them. Instead of working "for the people", the Dems have taken on ego trips and still fend for themselves.
The minority far right (just as the far left) is too radical.
Running a weak candidate for president in 2008. I think the ticket should have been reversed.
I am neither a Republican or a Democrat but I dislike the way the country is heading the republicans keep giving tax breaks to the rich while we middle class have to pay more than our fair share
They have unresponsive to their constituents almost to the point of becoming "crooks" trading their votes in Congress for "bribes" consisting of special funds/exemptions that are applicable to only their own districts/states.
I have no party affiliation so both parties have things that I dislike in equal proprtions. An example: I am pro-abortion and I'm anti-gun control.
the simple fact that some politicians are so party oriented, that they fail to see that it would behoove them to be bi-partisan.
Back room deals, under the table deals Bickering and doing nothing worthwhile. Elitiest attitude, better than the general public that they are suppossed to be representing. Only looking out for themselves and not abiding by the peoples wishes
Republicans have walked away from CONSERVATIVE VALUES, like balanced budget, preserving the sanctity of marriage, upholding the constitution, etc.
I'm a moderate. I dislike that both sides lie and are corrupt.
I don't like the fact that they all a bunch idiots that can't get anything done for the people. Both parties!!!
Will not stand up for what they know is right..
i don't believe ethier party can get anything done in a simple and straightforwardmanner that does not confuse the amereican people.i saw a lady with a stack of paperwork that is the health reform bill.it would take her 69 hrs.just to read it.that is completly absurd.
I am a registered Democrat, and I dislike the fact that Obama abandoned his campaign promises of bipartisanship and measured, reasonable government.
Lack of dedicated resistance to current programs
Too many republicans in name only. Republicans will not stand toe to toe with the progressive liberal politicians either democrat or republican on political issues. Too many lawyers in both parties.
I don't like our stance on the death penalty.
When some people think of Republicans, they may think of Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck. From what I know, those two are maniacs. As for Democrats, I can't stand Al Franken. Unless you are a %120 Democrat, you are nothing to him.
Too eager to make compromises; easily cowed.
They are all crooks I dont trust anyone of them.
I feel that I am more of an independent and see things down the middle. The thing I don't like about the parties is that they seem to be so one sided and not able to see any thing that makes sence if the other side came up with it! We are too divided as a country and need to remember that we are all AMERICAN!
poor decisions are made that do not seem to follow the direction of the votors and that the party did not do as promised when they ran.
politics - playing sides for the sake of playing sides. Decide on its own merit regardless of party lines.
their sneaky back room dealing and i will be switching my party
No ability to relate to lower income families
I don't belong to a party (can't register, non-citizen), but as a liberal, I don't like some of the over sensative political correctness that comes with the Democrat party.
Dems don't have enough appreciation for balancing budget, reducing deficit and market based incentives.
they gone on a spening spread and don't wnen to quit,about a health bill that is all wrong,they going to cut medicare
I dislike the way that my party makes promises that they do not keep.
I didn't like McCain being the Republic candidate for President.
That they dont see the a need for more healthcare
need more job openings for unemployed. higher costs for perscription drugs,....
Too much control by the right wing of the party.
I dont like the way Obama is running this country!!!!!!!
Democrats often seem to split over issues rather than working together as a party. i feel this weakens the party over all
the democrat party can not seem to get 2 get important bills passed, like medical, ssi, and other bills that are important to senior citizens.
They keep calling me to contribute money
I am realy non-partizan so I pick out the best of all partys and that is how I vote
The republican party did not try hard enough to win the last presidential election. It allowed too many things to slide by and did not expose the democratic candidates for who they were.
too conservative sometimes with too old representation.
I dislike when my party act and legislates like the other party
Too partisan Stratify the struggling and fortunate
i am independant voter i believe there is to much in fighting between both parties that is why we get nowhere.
I think my own party doesn't always listen to their constituance.
Stooping to "their" level and letting them get a toe hold.
I thinks some times they can wishy washy
increasing taxes to give to social programs
cant think of a thing right now about the democrats right now
I don't have a good answer for this very good question but I certainly don't LIKE everything ANY political party does. I guess I dislike when any party votes down party lines and don't use common sense.
i really dont know i am just old enough to vote
I'm not either party. There are things I don't like about both of them.
I don't like how the Republican pary alienates gays and their pro-life stance.
When they were in control they didnt do all they could have done.they wasted a good chance to set some things straight.
I'm not affiliated with ANY political party.
Extreme religiousness; platform on population controll; softness on illegal immigration; affirmative action; socialism; political correctness
Their always spending and wasting money on stupid projects, when both paries need to put the money on improving this economy!
rhetoric and posturing impede actual policy for a better representation of constituencies.
The Libertarian Party is not strong enough to make a dent in this two-party monopoly
that they really do not care about the people
the fact they are busy fighting , even among them selves, and not tackling other important issues
I don't like how republicans look at homosexuality or how democrats look at health care
Too much bickering and not enough cohesiveness on the issues. Too many freebee handouts which make people reliant on the govt dole.
I have no desire to be part of any party or affiliation.
I do not think of myself as a Democrat or Republican. There is plenty to dislike about both
i don't like ether party.. i think they don't care about the average person all they worry about is greasing there pockets. if they cared for the people they would work together instead of fighting each other.on everything. from day one after the election they start working harder on who they want to run in 4yrs. then they care about fixing things that need to be addressed .
I think Democrats can get too over-zealous about environmentalism. Although this may be important, we can surely focus on more severe issues (health care and jobs).
I am an independant. I dislike about the Republicans that they started the government bailout and anti-recession spending. I dislike about the Democrats that they want to socialize the country, with socialized medicine and owning car companies and banks, competing with free market companies.
democrats have a difficult time sticking together as a voting block, especially in the House
Too much politics interfer with decisions that could help millions of people
I am neither Democrat or Republican. I concider myself as independent. But I can tell you that I am thoughly discusted with our gov't. as it stands today and I feel that we need to clean house and start all over with "new" people in charge.
Too many liberal leaning members who won't listen to their constituants.
I don't like all the phone calls. This is for both parties. I don't like seeing then put each other down or finding of the faults they have or digging into their past.
cutting benefits or promisses in own party
I consider myself to be a Republican, but they seem to lack the spirit often to get the public fired up about their ideas. I wish they were more impassioned like Glen Beck for instance.
I'm not involved in politics enough to know of anything to dislike. Locally I know enough to dislike the Democrat party. We had a Union Hall near where we live and they partied, then voted.The Democrats always won. I think the Republicans are more responsible, especially financially... Can't believe what's going on now.
There is no real option between parties.I want to be a democrat but I cant afford any more taxes
I considered myself a republican until it was too hard to tell the difference between their policies and those of democrats. They've gotten away from fiscal responsiblity, they are promoting bigger government and bigger government interference in people's lives. I received a mailing from the RNC a few months ago and blasted them and their policies...I haven't heard from them since. I now consider myself an independent but I remain a registered republican so I can vote in primaries.
I get very upset because none of the Congressmen can work together for the general good. Each has his own agenda and nobody cares about anyone else. The Republicans should work to expose what is going on behind the scenes in the way of dirty deals to get votes.
Parties don't make a dam bit of difference to me. I may vote in an election for one or the other but the way there mind is on some matter is what counts.
They lack the ability to coalesce into a team.
More interest in the high end citizen than the little guy
thier stuborness i don,t see why they cant corpreat better
The city where I live, Philadelphia, is a "one-party town" and famously corrupt. The city government was corrupt back when it was Republican, and it's corrupt now that's it's Democrat. They say no matter how bad the Democratic incumbent and how good the non-Democratic challenger, only Republicans can win elections here. These are major problems for the millions of people who reside in the region. Nationally, the Democratic party is disorganized, has some less-than-stellar members of congress, and right now too timid in the face of Republican opposition. I understand Obama is trying to be a uniter not a divider, but you can't fight lies and deception with hugs.
Their inability to pull something together (like health care) and just get it done.
The republicans passed legislation to increase medicare prescription drug coverage while the national debt increases and medicare and social security are headed to insolvency. It was irresponsible.
The continued spending. Republicans are supposed to be Conservative. That means "LIMITED GOVERNMENT", etc., but very few of them are.
they're all corrupt, some more then others, looking out for their own special interests.
I do not consider myself a member of either party -- I do not like the lack of desire to compromise and come to equitable decisions displayed by both of those parties.
The conserative right wing of the Republican Party.
Polititions are no longer accountable to the electorate but to the lobbyists,contributors,corporate intrest, and party.
I dislike how they are forcing the health care thru
politicians think more of themselves and lining their pockets rather than the american people
Try and give too much away instead of helping people help themselves
I don't like a lot of Republicans but I like most of the Republican belief.
The time it take to get somethings done...
They are adopting progressive ideas vice conserative ideas.
There has been in the past too many morally wrong things that have taken place.
The fact we have political parties when we are in the 'United' States of America. Utter rubbish.... Democrats and Republicans need to shun party ideals and wake up to realize actions should be taken in the best interest of this nation's future, this world's well being, and this generations children and their children to come, not stupid party ideologies.
Democratic Party has become too insular,in my opinion.
I don't have any party affiliation, I dislike the religious, gun fanaticism of the Republican party, and the liberal government spending of the Democrats.
I didn't vote for twenty years I do not have any interest in politics.To me they are all a bunch of crooks that are just after power and money.I registered to vote just to vote for Obama hoping for change. I'm too sure I made a good choice.
A little slow to react to the people some times.
Allowing to many congressional perks that we, the citizens have to pay for.
IT DOES NOT DO ENOUGH FOR THE GOOD OF THE COUNTRY.
Lack of action/initiative. Our country needs big changes and they are not delivering.
I believe both parties are 90% controlled by corporate interests and their lobby.
They can't see the big picture. All politicians are self serving in both parties. Corruption is rampant in both parties. Reelection is their primary concern.
I dislike the same thing about both parties, especially my own. They are not flexible. They would rather be "the winner" party than do what's right for our country.
as a --- we are not together is what I dis like
they do not give the country top priority.first is theirselves ,second is consticuants for votes third is usa
free-wheeling spending and penalizing those who have worked hard, educated themselves, and tried to better themselves.
being a minority in the I can't think of anything that they stand for that I don't like
My party as well as all others have stopped representing the people and are seeking for nothing but their own gain and power.
How party has became popular in order to get more votes having as results unuseful policies
I think maybe Democrats want to give to much money to unworthy causes
can't think of anything right off hand. can we come back to this?
not conservative enough not voting for the "fair tax" too much spending
Don't feel they stuck with the conservative values
they don't always hold true to their values.
It's not the party, it's the politicians that I think need a major overhaul
We are neutral and do not support any political party
We always look weak next to GOP lies and fake agenda items
I think there are crooks in both parties
both parties only give a crap about themselves
Republicans spend as much money as the Democrats. Also, there are Some Progressives in the GOP, but a lot more in the Dems. Progressivism equates with Socialism and Marxism. Not good for a country that's a Constituional Republic.
To tell you the truth.....I don't have a dislike about my party. They stand true to what WE THE PEOPLE want, which is not the damn health care bill as it is. So, when you have people of conviction, and are voting NO which is WILL of the majority of the CITIZENS, what is there to dislike????
I'm registered as a "Republican", but only as it is the lesser of two "evils". I am a fiscal conservative. By that, I mean, that if you want something, you work and pay for it. I am not just pro "Choice", I am pro "Abortion". I have several other liberal concepts, but I'll let the above indicate my feelings. I really feel that I am a "Libertarian". I vote for Ross Perot against Geo. H.W. Bush because he called no new taxes and then recanted.
To some degree the neoliberalism - free trade agreements without sufficient environmental, social and labor protection.
I like to think of myself as an Independent. Where neither the Democrats or the Republicans deliberately do nothing, we should throw all these bums out till we get some one in there that does something for us.
most don't believe in abortion under any circumstances
Being negative without offering reasonable, practical alternatives.
gun control is probably the main thing I struggle with regarding democratic party.
I DON'T LIKE IT BECAUSE THEY TAKE AWAY FROM POOR THAT'S GOT SO LITTLE IN LIFE.THEY DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT WHERE THIER NEXT MEAL IS COMING FROM OR DO I PAY MY ELECTRIC,WATER,RENT,LAND TAX,AUTO INSURICE,PAY DOCTORS BILLS,KEEP CAR RUNNING,PUT GAS IN CAR,OR BUY MEDICINE THAT IT TAKES FOR USE TO LIVE.NOW I ASK THEM HOW CAN YOU SLEEP OR EAT KNOWING PEOPLE ARE OUT HERE GOING WITHOUT AND DIEING?ARE THEY GOING TO PAY FOR OUR FAMILY TO PUT US IN THE GROUND??
I don't have a like or dislike. I don't consider myself either
All they worry about is getting re-elected, instead of tking care of the bussness of government.....
That they have not done a better job of shrinking the size of the federal government
all polticians lie and abuse their power and our money
I don't have a party. Both parties are jokes
When tey go against what the party stands for
When I heard the statement pass the bill and then we will find out what is in it.
At this point there is nothing to dislike about my party. They are attempting to control the socialization of America.
I don't like either party we need to get away from the bipartisan system.
Independent, vote for whoever I feel is best for the position
not getting health insurance approved fast enough
not taken more time connecting with all, the states that we needed to win the presidential election.
I don't have a party. I don't like either side.
I would like to see more of them trying to get along with the Rep. But it is pretty hard to do when the other party is so hateful. Some times I think that they give into some big interests , but then they all do !! But I still beleive that the Demacrates are for us little people.. I have a hard time really tursting those of either party that have been in office so long that they don't represent the people back home anymore .just whoever gives the most !I am a Democrate and proud of it !!!
Being labled the rich man's party. Also it appears members of either party can "be bought" to support issues they campaigned against and were not elected for.
I dislike that our party is associated with Nancy Pelosi. Everytime I see her I cringe at the way she projects herself. She seems to me to be very selfinvolved and more interested in the success of the Democratic party than in the welfare people she serves.
they do not stick together on vital issues.
Their inability to always stand up for what is right due to the political games.
They are too passive when it comes to dealing with the radicalfringe on the other side.
We are in the current tax and spend freefall because our congress has failed to represent the majority of taxpayers and are following the whims of a dictatorial president who has way overstepped the limits of his office.
All the back room deals made to pass a particular Bill.
I am not sure. I am not that much into politics
They are too busy arguing with the other party to get any real work done.
Some democrats push abortion. I am not for abortion.
They both lie to get thier agendas inacted and those of their special interest groups, before that of the public they supposedly serve!
They seem to be fighting for the sake of fighting
giving in to there demands for other favors
I do not consider myself a part of either party. What I dislike most about each, however, is the attitude they take with each other. I do not like how the Democrats seem to put on airs and have a holier than thou attitude, while the Republicans often are mean spirited, often making fun of opponents.
Optimism needs to be tempered by realism
"Issues concerning health care because there are 11 states that are filing a lawsuit to stop the federal government from overstepping its constitution powers and sovereignty". "Virginia had a state law declaring that people cannot be required by buy health insurance and Idaho has done the same thing".
It bothers me that so many peope are elected to office based on facts stated in their campaigns and then ending up "going with the flow." This was just proven on passage of the Health Care Bill today (3/20/10) Scott Murphy a newly elected Senator from NY had said he'd vote against it, then "flip flopped" at the end and voted for it.
there not listening to what the voters are telling them
democrats all ways favor abortion rights over life of the un born
there is nothing i don!t like about my party
Stance on abortion; I believe that we should have the right to choose -- do not believe the law should.
some of the policies supported by democrats i dont support.some veiws i dont agree with have to do with government spending and taxes.
spend to much money and they are sometimes realy dumb!
While the Democrats are spending like crazy, the Republicans are not without fault. Too much spending trying to cure every ill know to man. Both parties need to let citizens take Responsibility for their life's.
I wish the republicans would be more united.
they continue to just be republicans and not conseritive
they say they are for the people but they usually are in it for themselves. once they get into office they forget about the promises they made the people or many times they just sell out for perks. They have forgotten about responsibility and integrity.
do not agree with immigration policy, often too liberal
Listen TOO much to special interests and not welfare of US citizens.
I can not think of anything I dislike a great deal about the democratic party
They tolerate and even encourage liberal/progressive candidates.
Polosi. The fact that what they,politicians, want is more important than what most people want
THEY START OUT WORKING WITH EACH OTHER AND THEN TURN THE OTHER WAY
they think that no matter what they are right about everything but that is both parties that is why i dont like politics
had a chance to reaaly do some good but let the opturnity pass.
They spend way to much money on a war that means nothing or is going nowhere.
That they allow Ms. Pelosi to have such a powerful position.
sometimes I feel that they take too much of abuse from the other side, and they do not react fast enough, I feel they are big believers, and slow counteracters
The health care reform is not going to work, more people will be without jobs, and the government will have control over your health insurance, not a smart move.
Republican Is only about how much money we can make NOW we should be doing for the one who is not able to make it.I thought I was republican but I want to help my fellow man so I voted Democrat for the first time in my life.
my party need to work harder to get more people involve in our party.
the way that they havr refused to corporate with the president because of the lobbyist that are giving them all cash money instead of working for their constituents.
I'm a conservative, when the republican party try's to out liberalize the dems I want to find a new party.
I don't like the fact that the democratic party is trying to take away my gun rights and abolish the 2nd amendment. 2nd, I don't like the idea that my tax dollars are going to support illegal aliens when so many legal citizens are pushed to the wayside. Take care of our own first, then take care of the rest of the world!!!
The vote along party lines is necessary. Individual thinking for the good of voting constituents is forbidden. The representatives consider themselves rulers!
Spending like Democrats, not CONSERVATIVES
I dislike some of the dems because they are not tough enough with the opposition.
steering away from more traditional values that are a trademark of conservatives.
I conider myself an independent. I am basically satisfied with the way I can vote.
i'm an independant and we don't have enough voices.
They do not really think of the ordinary working people. They don't know what it is like.
Not able to dispel their "anti-religious" reputation to the fundamentalists.
I don't feel that I am a part of either party. There are things on both sides I like and things I dislike. I am independant.
The majority of politicians, no matter which party they belong to, seem to have difficulty being completely straightforward and honest, not putting "spin" on issues.
i am not affiliated with any political party
I can't think of anything I dislike right at the moment.
The dems had a chance with all the votes in house and senate to make real change instead they give in to the gop
The thing I dislike is that some of us do not stick together faithfully or trust each other because some of us are influenced by the almighty dollar.
It takes too long to get things done because of fighting between parties
I have no party,I'm a middle of the road,person..... I have no coment,sorry..
the way the representive uses this meaens to get rich and not really care what the people really want.
i don't identify with either party because they both have conservative and liberal views and i don't agree full-heartedly with either side's views,
I don't support the party system- necessarily. I do, however, tend to lean, heavily, toward the Democratic side of our 2-party system. I am very liberal about most matters. My focus is on honesty, integrity, and yes (rose-colored glasses on), strife-sometimes; it builds character. So I do not think of myself as either of the parties mentioned in the question, however, I have learned how to vote as if my vote really counted, no matter what the party. Make sense?
there like everybody else they don't keep there word they say one thing but do another
They are not all united on lot's of things.
all they care about is how much money they can spend. do not like this very much if they need money they just take it out of some like medcare and never put it back.every one i talk to said the same thing.they get it and we do not.we need this money they do not. carl g.
i was a democrat before the last election but now im not sure if i am anything because i would have never thought the people in the usa would support a communist socialist for a president it is time for the real americans to unite and restore the meaning of the constitution to its government its a country ran by its people not a people ran by a country
I am a registered Democrat but in name only. Honestly and really I am a moderate conservative independent.
They support unions and tend to push more entitlement programs
i think that the democrets should let the powerful lobbiest give them money like they do the republican and then vote against whatever bill they want passed so the bobbiest know they cant be bought like they do the repub;icans.
They think Gov has the answer to ALL issues. It does not.
that they are trying to ram the health care plan down our throats.
Too many talk a good talk but their lives don't always match.
I am a republican but I do not like what is being done with immigrants and providing access to work
They can't seem to get organized/united like the Republicans can. Democrats tend to pit themselves against each other.
don't listen and do as the American people want them to do.
They spend too much money on stuff that doesn't help the economy.
There are times when we don't want to hear anything the other party has to say.
I guess, at times I really wonder, Why have two different parties??? Why not just vote for the "person" who we think would do the BEST FOR OUR COUNTRY... I remember learning, way back when, "WE THE PEOPLE" What happened to "we the people"??? It is not the normal folks who make these changes or come up with the ideas. I really think we could do with out parties. Just ask the american people. "We the people".
the small business and lower income needes help also
i like the truth .it seems that most of them do not .they need to work for us , an keep their hands to them self.
Really can't do that, don't feel that I am a member of either party, I just vote for people I think are best for the job, doesn't really what their party affliation is.
As representatives of the people, they are far more interested in their own agenda than those they represent, and more interested in "us" vs. "them" to accomplish anything that benefits the average American
most goverment reps or senators do not listen to the people
I have at one time belonged to both parties. What I dislike about both is the unwillingness to admit being wrong.
The DISLIKE the Republican stance on Energy & Oil, the Environment, and Taxes.
I am not happy with a foreign policy which spends an estimated one trillion dollars every year-regardless of which party is in power-on bases and troops around the world. I would like to see reductions phased in over time steadily.
they still spend too much money. They comprise on issues where we lose our freedoms.
i am very disapointed in my party.i think they have gone astray of what has made this nation grate.i still have faith in my country as a whole.but i am ashamed of how we the people have been left out of the process.
i am not a democrat or a republican and i don't have anything to say about any of them
I dislike that it is Republicans against Democrats instead of what is best for everyone.
they seem to be all over things and not taking care of the current situation here at home with umemployment higher than it has ever been in decades
the luck of guts to stand for truth, and face this administration, they are getting better but not enough
Sometimes they are way too conservative.
I am not one or the other. I beieve that there are good and bad with all parties.
The most thing I hate with both parties are the decissions that are may where both parties can not come together as one.
there is nothing at all that i "dislike" about the democratic party
They don't seem willing to work with the other party - just wants it their own way and they'll do whatever they have to in order to accomplish that.
Democrats want to please everyone...and somstimes you just can't.
I do not like how the Democrats ramed the health care bill thiught without against the wishes of the popele that voted them in office.
They should avoid taking bribes from corporations.
They did not have nerve enough to go with the one payer system on healthcare.
Neither party ever works together to really solve problems that are best for the country. They each stick to whatever the traditional stand is for their particular party. This is why the country is in a poor economic state and is never going to pull out of it. Politicians should work together for the greater good instead of bickering about what party is in control and which party had the idea.
I dislike the way republicans seem to be "stuck" in one mind set and unable to think outside the box.
Republicans (although this is the same for Democrats) don't try to negotiate with the other with a levelhead.
do not care about the people or their rights
I am not happy with the "progressive" aspect of the republican party.
I don't have a party. I find the views of each party applicable in certain situations with different types of people but neither is applicable in all instances. The lack of cooperation on both sides makes me feel that they need to be removed from the political scene until they learn to work together.
The corruption and greed that all of the parties seem to have, and that once a politician gets in office they use it to push their own personal agendas and not that of the constituents
how each party fight against one another
they don]t work with opposite party as fellow americans
I don't consider myself either Dem or Rep...I'm Independant
cant pass anything without arguing or adding things so no one agrees
Too much emphasis on cutting taxes, just to get voters support
sometimes they say one thing and then turn around an do something else.
I feel my party has fallen into the hands of extremists who would rather rather hold to narrow beliefs at any cost. This doesn't win elections. Compromise is a necessary evil.
Everyone is going to have something they like or dislike about politics. I pretty much try to stay neutral and just go with what I believe in. And, I also try to give most people the benefit of the doubt. So, there's probably a lot of things I could dislike about either party. But, right off I do not agree with abortion and I do agree even as an embryo, it is still a living being and has just as much right for a chance as life as a "newborn".
i dislike abortions, i will vote for the person und not for a party from now on.
Not sticking to core values and trying to please "everyone".

Please try once more to think of something that you dislike about your own party.
They are trying to push this health bill on us and are cutting more medicare on the older people.
Believe the democratic party should be more assertive in promoting honesty and justice against obstructionist actions.
I have no preference,am more in the middle when it comes to politics.
I'd rather not participate in political surveys.

Now, please tell me one more thing that you DISLIKE about YOUR party.
I am an Independent---I have no dislikes about the party
Can not think of anything else about my party. Just want the Republicans to get back to their roots of being more financially conservative.
They don't put things in the context that the uneducated can understand. that leave a large block of the public watching Glen Beck.
Vice President Biden. He seems incompetent for his position.
Neither party members are doing anything to help work together
Government take over of health care. Wen have they ever had a program that ONLY cost as much as they said. This is going to bankrupt the country.
That our side resigns or kicks out anyone who makes any kind of mistake, when the other side practically congratulates their guys for doing the same things.
I dislike the quarreling of both parties that leads to most ideas being squashed before they can take flight.
Dislike that Christopher Dodd, from my home state, has brought disrepute to the party with his scandals/controversy.
i hate that someone will be like oh i feel this way about abortion i must be a democrat...
Too entrenched in old-time conservatism. Being a conservative in 2010 is not the same as being a 1970's protestant conservative.
Again, both parties do this: talk and act if what their party stands for/ is trying to accomplish will result in the end of the state/country as we know it if they are not successful.
I am a moderate liberal and don't always agree with the social programs that are too much 'give away' without incentives for recipients to get the education they need to become self sufficient
they don't need to recessional when they are the majority
They are not willing to find middle ground to get things done.
Does not always nominate the best person, rather seems to be "your next"
The politics that prevent parties from working together for the good of citizens.
That as a much more morally based party we will still attempt at all costs to us to try to work with the democrats while they use that willingness to work together against us to lie and manipulate the media to make us look like criminals when the democrats are the true evil in this country
The old guard seems to always lead and never take fresh thoughts into account.
don't like their position on abortion and homosexuality
Lack of a willingness to remove our armed forces from illegal amd immoral foreign invasions
I do not like the health bill that the president is trying to get passed.
I am not really into politics so do not have much input
choose poor leaders in congress and legislature
accepting $$ from insurance and pharmaceutical lobbies
as in both parties, it's hard to believe some of the promises made and not carried out.
The Democrats don't know how to defend themselves adequately against false accusations
Some Republicans have been high spenders, contrary to the Reagan Conservative ideas of small government and low taxes.
Should be brought out [stressed] that the GOP freed the slaves & that welfare weakens the whole country.
I am an independant I chose not to favor any party because they choose to favor themselves rather then middle class america
The party shows NO INTEREST in bi-partisan efforts to make things/legislation etc. better for everyone.
Being asked to define myself by a party affiliation.
I don't think I have another thing that I dislike.
They don't stand on principles. They play political games and make shady deals when passing legislation.
They side with whomever gives them deals. They're greedy and selfish.
I believe that health care needs to be reformed, but I dislike the Democratic Party's insistence on pushing through an extensive, overreaching bill that most Americans oppose. It is quite undemocratic.
I dislike the fact that they are still using earmarks
they seem to react to Republicans instead of acting first
Many politicians are not honest. Many even take money for services.
Local republican leaders do not try to recruit people to fill empty PCO positions and train them to be effective.
The perceived "Godlessness" of party members.
Republicans couldn't come up with a similar young buck who could compete against Obama in 08.
THere are not enough independent people!
money is spent for the wromg things - money that could be more used to better benefit our own people and our own ountry is spent elswwhere when our country is in such an economic disaster
Can't really think of anything, I don't follow the party itself all that closely.
Attitude towards international friendly countries
they just don't care about the people,only what the Obama want
I don't like that they are generally against abortion.
i vote for the canidate on their own merits
That they are voting to stop the healthcare reform.
more treatment centers for drug addicts,less jail time.
He spinny to much time runnig all over the world putting his nose everyin everbody affairs instead looking after our on contry!!!!!!
everyone has that it is all about me attitude
they don't always do a good job getting out the vote and they get lazy, assuming because they have a majority they don't have to still work for our votes
Thye need to find some strong people to run for offices
Forget about the peoples that sent them there.
Some politicians do not stick to their grounds and vote along party lines on important issues.
poor choice of vice presidential candidate
The leadership in my party are becoming disconnected with the voters in the party
i vote the person or issue not for what each party thinks you should.
When they get into power they forget who put them into office.
they dont defend there positions sometimes very well
social security did not get a cost of living increase in 2010. the cost of living has gone up sky high. for low income senior citizens. it's impossible to live on the amount of money we get.
some times I wonder if they listen at all
Taking care of the party instead of the peoples business
Lack of respect for people of different orientations.
their all a bunch of backistabbing bunch of crooks
I dislike lies and coverups, but both parties do that.
Don't like their not listening to others.
The lack of compassion in immigration laws
Im a republican.I wont caps on what they can charge for meds. there is no resion to allow These prices on Meds.
I'm not affiliated with ANY political party.
Their too worried about themselves and no one else
I do not like that the Libertarian Party is not strong enough to make a dent in the two party system in the US
supporting special interest groups, looking after there own agenda, disconected from the people.
I don't like how democrats don't think life starts at conception and I don't like how republicans treat the poor and needy
Too liberal on some issues where a more conservative approach would meet the opposition half-way.
I feel that both parties are flawed and need to be dismissed.
i don't consider myself as dedicated to nether.
I think they go overboard on gun control. Although I would never want to fire a weapon, these items have useful places in society.
I don't have a party. I lean Libertarian but they are too extreme for me as I prefer some governmental regulation.
Willing to spend too much taxpayer money.
I am getting much less than previously; in medical or no yearly increase in social security disability benefit-that is bad for me and all others
They want to spend money too, just like the Dems, only not nearly as much.
I think the President is trying to do too many things at once.
Things are broken in Washington and they're at the root of the problem. They speak of bi-partisanship but act like spoiled children whenever they're asked to work with democrats on anything. How embarassing it is for the US to be portrayed as a bunch of spoiled kids. of course, the democrats aren't much better...they've become a bunch of socialist dictators...my way or the highway and if they continue to hold sway in government, our children's children's children won't be able to afford to dig us out of the financial mess they've created. Pretty sad commentary on the state of what was once the greatest nation on earth.
It seems as if everyone is afraid to lose a vote if he speaks up for what is the best thing for the common good.
They allow themselves to be swayed into side bars instead of sticking to the issues.
Unwillingness to work with the other parties. No one party is right on all issues. We need to work together.
maybe a bit more research or public input like with the health care would help
The Democrats need to work with the Republicans for the betterment of the country, not waste time bickering & name calling.
They led the invasion of Iraq which had nothing to do with 911 on the flimsy excuse of WMD. The WMD on 911 were commercial aircraft. Should we invade every nation with aircraft?
they make promises that they dont forfil
The corruption in the party is far too prevalent.
they don't take into consideration what the people realy want.
The need to be negative about other parties - and as I said, they are NOT either MY party.
I think most of the republican party is racist.
I dislike how the president is handleingthe war
not willing to work on what is really important for the country
I am conservative and I don't really know a whole lot about the Republican beliefs but I know I side with them more than Democrats.
The ability to truthfuly say what is actualy going on with the ecomony in the country.
I really consider myself an independent who may identify more with the Republican party, so I guess I would say I dislike how conservative Republicans can be...
Tax and waste politics seems to be the norm these days.
I don't like foreign policies that use our military resources to resolve conflicts in other countries
He has no concern for the elderly or disabled.
Was working to much with opposition party in spending our hard earned taxpayer dollars. Should have said "no" more.
TOO MUCH BICKERING WITH THE REPUBLICAN PARTY/
They are afraid to do what needs to be done.
They do not reguard all people as equal. Not so much racially, but financially, social status, and sexual orientation.
too much attention to party antics and not enough to statesmanship
To work more for the people of America, instead of being so political and not working together with the other party.
They are all a bunch of liers and thievs.
I think they don't want to face some of the real issues that matter
looks like this is going to be a futile exercise
Decision making, don't compromise your decisions because you are being offered something that might backfire in the long run
too eager to pull military out of middle east
Read the previous reply......this seems like a democratic survey.....I say this because, they don't listen to what he common citizen has to say. SEE YOU IN NOVEMBER.....
certain politicians seeking their own reelection above the public interest
there is too much of the fact that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Sometimes seems to hang on to things in the past, just because it worked then.
Again, poorly worded questionaire. I am decline to state. There is NO party affiliation. All politicians are idiots.
Both parties have many faults and that is why I said we need to get away from the bipartisan system.
I wish there were more here in Idaho.. I know that the Mormon Church is mostly Rep. and when you are surrounded by them , it is hard to ever get anything done in favor of the little guy here !
I can not think of something that is more than a difference of oppinion and has become a dislike.
Feel our representavtives have lost some of the essential core values as to why they are representing us and are too busy ensuring they maintain their seat instead of championing the right decisions/choices that need to be made.
They cannot get the other party to work with them.
I believe I just did, as I have seen little difference in democrat and republican EXCEPT for the recent vote on health care.
They are not listening to the members of their own party.
the over interest in the money instead of the people
Again, without considering myself a part of either, I'll add something for each. I dislike how Democrats often talk a very high-minded idealistic philosophy when running for office, that often appeals to me, and then does not stick to those principals with their action in office. I dislike how Republicans, today, seem set on solutions that are very individualistic, isolationist, and seem to me to be short term fixes to long term problems.
Make too many concessions, often the results just doesn't work
"Lacking other types of issues such as environment, economy and immigration".
The aforementioned answer covers my answer to this question. GUESS I SCREWED UP MY REPLY!!
there going back on there promises to the people
they are afrad to stand up for what there beleive
All the super conservative ideas. I am fairly conservative; but not ultra-conservative
once they get their vote they stop trying to keep their place
too much arguing among themselves,not working with each other and the president to get things done.
that sumed it up...a blanket statement that needs nothing else
Even though other partys' members bash at my party or any other party because they lost and make it impossible or become unreasonable because their party members lost either the presendentacy or members of the house, congress they behave like spoiled brats. they are placed in office to run the country to the best of their ability not to put this bill down or the other because the other party is pushing to get it passed they should just work together and resolve the situations that need attention --Do their job.
Too many support "big government" policies.
The war is going on too long, people are loosing there live for something that we are ending up with nothing.
That they are not raising taxes nire for the rich.
I believe I said all I really dislike about my party
Democrats are struggling to their party in the White House as oppose to whats good for the people. I think its about power struggle, and not the people.
We are too involved i Big companies and I believe we are not LISTENING to others
my party need to be more consistance in what we stand for.
how they wish that the president will fail as if they do not know that he fai the country will fail.
I just told you two things in my first answer.
Lack of Backbone, in other words no courage or moral standards
The dems should not care what the reps. have to say.They should realize that the reps are out to destroy them no matter what they do.
Thinks we the people don't see what is going on.
I dislke you telling me I dislike my Party
too many personal scandals a la John Edwards.
they dont do what they say are going to do
I can't think of anything considering the health reform that just passed just makes me very upset at how we will pay for this.
It seems like too much time is put into staying in power
take to much money from special interest groups
That they don't work with each other to get jobs done right.
I do not subscribe to a "party"! But, as I said before, I lean heavily on the Democratic side. That being said, "if" I were disappointed in the Democratic party, I would have to say that I am very disappointed in all of them on the fine line of honesty/deception- I think "they" call this "transparency" on the hill. Tranparency my ass!
I did not like John McCain's choice in running mates.
they blow off to much smoke and do nothing.
Need to stand strong and not change their minds
i do not like who is in charge of this party. he does not know what to do all he does is spend money an money does not buy every thing in life and that for shore. carl g.
it allowed obama to be elected just to make history
Die-Hard democrats give their party a bad name and reputation.
Not in concert with each other on issues like healthcare
i cant think of any other thing right now.
I know what is best for my family and me, I don't need someone else telling me how to put my coat on
They let themselves get blindsided too much.
I don't like how the taxation is not occurring on the rich...those who make over a certain amount should be taxed more
They come off as too arrogant/ leftist sometimes. More middle of the road would be wiser.
Dont want to fight for anything, always want to give it to people without the people working for it.
I believe both parties, no matter who they are, just tell us what we want to hear. They are liars and cheaters, those who are in office. Most not all, most are.
I dishlike many things about both partys I fell my party is only consearned with big busnesses
that they all care about is lining their pockets not doing their job for us
Same answer. I think a lot of the problem today is the fact that people vote the party and not the person.
The party seems hellbent on gaining a majority rather than accomplishing legislation that benefits the country
nothing that i can think of at this moment
I dislike the Republican stance on Abortion
I would like to see the power of corporations reduced and a return to more clout for the Middle Class-something which hasn't changed for several decades- regardless of the party in office.
they have taken advantage of the power given to them by the people that elected them.
I do not identify with either party, i feel the "two party" system is the downfall of "american democracy"
i don't know what i don't like because i know anything about any of them
they try and push things through either the state or the federal government and seem to stall on the things are important too other americans,like healthcare all the other nations in the world have a healtcare plan in place and here we sit with something that is going to cost everyone more money than they already do not have to spend...get these big drug and pharmacutical companies to dump some of there money into this as well while the middle and lower class people suffer from day to day while they other big ass honchos sit pretty with there big ass mansions and sprawling estates
no speak some lenguage when they has a problem like health care
Fear of turning our country into socialism.
tax and spend as if it is not there money
Sometimes they try to be bipartisan when it is useless.
Time and again, thet extend a hand to the republicans only to have it bitten off.
Professional liars. No politician ever tells the truth and they are all rich while the majority of this country is not.
all they think about is money and how they are going to get it
they favor the lobyists that give to their campaigns
More for business at the expense of the environment, the people, etc.
theres nothing! and please dont ask me about this subject ok thanks.
do not like it when canidate slings mud at opposing canidate
Dislike higher taxes, and being penalized for not not getting health insurance. If one cannot afford to pay for health insurance; then surely they will not be able to pay a stupid fine. Why not have them pay the money and have that money to go towards a health insurance plan instead of making it a fine.

Please try once more to think of something that you dislike about your own party.
That they are separate from the other party
I dislike the so-called "Rinohs" who always mess up when everyone else is in sync.
There is nothing I do not like about being completely neutral.
John McCain mascarades as a conservative when he is in fact a Progressive.
I do not like the "pro life" stance. I believe that the Republicans, given the chance, may do what the "Dems" are doing right now. I hope that they do. I really have no other dislikes, except those that are disliked of all politicians, and that is failure to DIRECTLY answer questions put to them and the use of adding on "goodies" to bills that have nothing to do with the matter at hand in the Bill to be voted on.
When McCain ran for president, he chose Sarah Palin to run with him.She had no experience in international affairs.
Rep - views on immigration and views on gay rights
some are not strng enough to stay conservative and they lean into a more liberal way, not strong enough
I dislike the fact that republican do not seem to be creating up and comming contenders for important offices. Everycandidate that I have seem lately is at best marginal.
Not fighting lobbyists in Washington D.C.
Pushing through legislation that the people do not want, against their wishes, without caring how it will affect people in the real world.

Please tell me something IMPORTANT TO YOU that you LIKE about the OTHER party:
I am an Independent---I lean toward Republican views. There is really nothing I like about the Democrates.
Freedom of Choice is the only thing I would agree with Democrats. The Democratic party has been taken over by the most "Liberal" and taking our country down.
I don't like the political situation in the US today. Be it Democrat or Republican. etc. We need a major overhaul and the People need to take thier Country Back.
That they do not agree with the health bill as it is written
nothing at all, they are basically both the same
This constant identification with parties is part of the problem.
I like their good intentions and concern for others even though we disagree completely on how to help.
I like both parties determination to stick to their ideals.
Republicans passed "No Child Left Behind," which despite its loopholes and problems is a great idea.
Their ability to reflect the changing demographics of the country.
This is more difficult than the other questions (and they were troublesome). I think that their are extremists in both parties and I hope that each party has individuals who will point out errors in the extremist positions held by the other party.
I used to believe that the Republican Party was conservative in spending, but that is not longer true - under George Bush the spending was totally out of control
Individuals who work justly regardless of party.
I like the fact they will be run out of office in November. Other than that the democrats are totally bancrupt.
Nothing especially do not like the president
They have an agressive stance but don't want to consider the thoughts on the other side of the aisle.
are not dominated by the religious right
a real commitment to gun rights. I hate guns, but gun rights are guaranteed in the constitution and must be upheld
Well, I feel the same way about both of the parties.
Some of their views on how the lower waged people are treated
The Republicans are organized and united
Not much. Seems they both suffer from same ailments - always saying they are interested in others while remaining self serving. That's local, county, state and national
Can't think of anything at the moment. With Pelosi's approval rating at 3%, WHAT CAN WE THINK?
I tend to favor the democratic party becuase some time they are willing to listen to middle class america
They seem to be more willing to tax people less and interfere less in people's lives.
Once again, I am neither party so... I like forcing big business to pay their share of taxes, and tax reform.
I'm encouraged that some members of the "other" party are willing to be bi-partisan.
Can't really think of too many things good about them that I like
NOTHING. They have been infiltrated by the Progessives who are Communists, Socialists, Marxists in Democrats clothing...
I'm not sure what I like anymore about either party because they both lie.
There is nothing I like about either parties.
after the last 8yrs.there is nothing i like about them
I like how the Republican party, at least ostensibly, believes in limited government, and how House Republicans have agreed to forgo earmarks.
The fact that there seems to be no way to protest programs which general concensus deems wrong but they always pass, one way or another
That there are still some who are against abortion
it would take me too long to think of something
That is tough if not impossible as, if you give them a week the things that I like will change. (They are so slow they need a week not five minutes.)
The democrats are very well organised in convincing the young voters to believe in them.
Like I said- I am not really into politics
they don't want to pass the health care reform
Democrats by tradition seem to promote and groom young talent (i.e. Carter '76 Obama '08).
There is not much I like about either party right now!
at the moment, I'm not happy with the decisions being made by either party.
they are listening to the people of this country
Not too much, simply because even if some of my beliefs are perhaps a little more conservative leaning,I still believe in the liberal view of freedom of choice and what not, as I don't feel I should tell others what to believe.
they say this health bill is all wrong,and do what it suppose to do
That the other party I feel will truly put country over party.
The Democrats are generally more open to choice.
That they want a nationalistic healthcare program.
for more local control,less from washington.
Seem to care more about the middle class
They might stay here in the our country and try help the Homeless to get jobs .
Republicans are very good at turning out the vote. and historically have had a good sense of business.
I like about them thecan no longer think ofthey ha anything I like about them ve move too far from the center
i think both parties are not in touch with with the people of our country. they do not understand or care what the people of our country want.
afraid at this time I can't think of a thing that I like
Focus on quality of life of middle and lower class of people.
dont know what to say about the other party that i like at this time
I think they are too liberal when it comes to programs that use taxpayer dollars.
More inclined to address social issues that affect the middle and lower income class.
i like the republicans because they listen to the people
I cant stand the other party .not 1 thing they do.
I'm not affiliated with ANY political party.
They have some very intelligent and savvy politicians in their party
I love how democrats care about people and want to help the poor and I love how the republicans budget
they're experts at shooting themselves in the foot
I think that both parties are useless and a waste of money and detract attention from important issues.
don't like or dislike nether. they lie and promise. anything to get in office. then they work for the lobbyist who got them there. people wouldn't give millions of dollars to some-one without something in return.. if that was true there would not be world hunger.
I like how they stress the importance of military defense. I felt Ronald Reagan was my perfect president.
I like that there are fiscal conservatives in both parties.
except for a couple moderate senators, nothing
Some good people that mean well for our country
It has some members who do listen to their people who elected them.
sorry but,i can't think of one right now.
there were some more thoughts about retired citizens
I like they are pushing for health care reform, but not their process.
In our town of Sykesville, Pa. there is not much to like or dislike in politics.
They all are trying to help the American people.
I don't know that I like a particular party. I like people in the party who vote for the majority they represent.
honestly the men and women sway me more than the party platform,s
I know some good people who consider themselves Republicans but that party has been almost completely co-opted by religious fanatics and plutocrats. It's been called a cult--their "reality" is a fabrication.
Nothing both partys have me dissapointed
I wish we could raise the amount of money that they are able to raise, but the corrupt unions do not like us.
The democrats are trying to get bills passed that help the average middle class american family.
The way they are making us aware fo what the heath care bill contains that will affect us
Try to make people responsible for their action
I could like some things about the "old" Democratic Party, but the ones in control now are definitely "socialists".
Democrats: I like they want to focus on helping the middle class.
They are more dedicated to smaller government than Democrats are these days.
I don't like either side they are all power hungry people that do what want.That's why I didn't vote for twenty years and I probally won't ever vote again.
That some are showing resistence to their leadership based on principles.
they protect their own (unfortunately it's only the rich people)
I like the idea that they support the working man, however, they have gotten a little off course in what they call the working man. They tend to include people living on entitlements. You have to have a job to be called a working man.
interest in balancing budgets and lowering taxes
I really have no comment about this subject.
I think the conglamerates are destroying mom and pop companys and yet the continue to recieve goverment Funding.
i like elephants better than donkeys. and that's about it.
that alot of them will be voted out if they vote for the "health care bill"
efforts being made but unfortunately not in the right direction
Which other party? There are lots of them, and they have different qualities.
There is not one thing I like about the Democratic Party. There platform has abortion in it, so I callo it the "Party of Death".
That there MAY be a few that still are voting NO, all are not yet corrupt
I understand that it is important to reinforce private companies.
Appears, at least, to be more tolerant of differing viewpoints.
I cannot think of anything that I like about the Democratic party
Nothing. Both parties are in it for themselves.
some good salespeople, to sell the bill of goods to get them elected.
They are so into themselves..Look what they have stired up over this Health care bill ! They have succeeded in divideing the country when we need to unite and go ahead and give this a try..How can they do that ? Because they are so against anything that the Democrates want to do..even if it is right ..Nothing is perfect for all of us..But I really have never seen such hatered umong people ..I can only guess what I will hear when I go out ..More hate ! Sad !!!
On the local level our Democrated representative has said true to his roots. Nothing much good about the national level.
I like that they are doing things that they feel are good for most people. I like that they try to solve problems, mostly.
Until lately, thy werejust the other party with different views. Now I believe they think they are the only party and do not believe they shoul be the minority. They do not believe in cooperation - only their way.
There are a few democrats that actually think independently of their party and attempt to represent their constituents.
More conserative on spending and National Debt
I like that they are a little bit more conservative in some respects.
let me see, what do I like about puke, nothing exept the purging of it.
I like how Democrats seem to be for a system where the community (on small-national scale) takes care of everyone. I like how most Republicans seem to push for fiscal responsibility.
"I know that we had a past Republican for President of the United States as in George W. Bush and he and Bill Clinton went to Haiti to raised aid after a devastating earthquake back on January 12th which is part of a fundraising effort".
I like the fact that some of them actually remember that they are ELECTED and conduct themselves accordingly.
nothing comes to mind. I don't have a polarized view of politics or see the world in terms of black and white
republicans no who votes for theme and they stand up for what they beleive
Women's roles. More women democrats have taken roles in government
they have a general goal even if it may be outdated
i like some of the opinions they express that differ from democrats about the economy,in particular.
I can't think of anything. They seem to be for everything that I oppose.
they believe in keeping businesses going, even though they don't always do it the proper way when gov't aids businesses all aspect of the business should be accounted for and detailed on the problems and how aid is being utilized.
the more conservative stand on immigration and taxing
Family values are seemingly more important to the republican party.
Nothing as far as the party establishment is concerned.
they always support each other no matter what!
they are standing up for what they believe in.
they aren't afraid to changethings to meet a goal
Republican - push moral issues Democrat - do highlight civil rights issues
they finally did something on the healt care.
That they want to make sure that the unions don't have too much power.
Their willingness to get along with others.
I like the Idea of helping future generations..Health care
I LIKE THE WAY WE STICK TOGEATHER WHEN MAKING DECISION.
the way that the president is trying to get both parties to work together
They were instrumental in cleaning up the smog in So Cal
As a whole the republican party is against giving blanket amnesty to illegal aliens.
I find that there is nothing that I like about the reps.
I can't think of anything I like about any political party.
They have been able to connect with "mainstream" (aka conservative) voters better.
Hopefully most of them will be voted out SOON!
I can't think of anything I LIKE about the other party.
IT COULD BE THAT ON THE OUTSIDE SOME OF THEM GOT EACH OTHER BACK NO MATTER WHAT.
help the poor that realy needs the most help
There is nothing both parties are equally bad.
i don't know which side says what about what topic, so i'm afraid i'm f little help here,
They are my brothers- in space, time, and humanity- it is my pursuit to help all men. I like their perseverance in the line of so much criticism.
That some of the Democrats did not like the new healthcare plan.
know you will not like what i would say.about this. not know later. carl g.
the republicans had a man of honor and strength to be their choice for president and a honest woman with a strong comittment to her country and its people to back him up
More Republicans seem to be moderately conservative than democrats.
they sure know how to cover their buds when they are cought doing something wrong.
I'm trying,maybe something will come to mind
I like the democrats stance on the war going on
Always fight in the war and dont take nothing from anyone.
I am not happy with our current leaders. I work in the Health Care field, and all they do is take payment away for most everything when it comes to our Senior population. We spend more for our prisoners than we do for our old folks. Now, does this make sense?
There is not one thing I like about the other party. THEY do NOT listen to what the people want, they make backdoor deals, do not tell the truth and they tramp on the constitution.
not much.i did like their choice in president.
really don't like anything about the other party
I like things that all parties have to offer.
They DO have somewhat of a sense of humor (lol)
the republican party seem to want smaller goverment and less control from the goverment
The two political parties have become so polarized that I cant think of anything important to me that I find appealing about the Republican's stand on any of the core issues.
there intentions are good about helping people they just want to make it at the expense of everyone else whether we like it or not
The fact that this question can be phrased what do u like or dislike about the "other" party is in and of itself detestable and shows exactly how un-democratic our system really is.
nothing really each party these days seem to spend more money than we will ever see and continue to borrow more money resulting in more money the general taxpayer is going to have to shell out in the end
nothing, i dont like the democrats and their liberal ideals.
john mackein speak strong and problably they offer better resolution for our problems
Not a whole heck of a lot at the present time.
They seem truly interested in accomplishing what is best for the country.
I thank there should be term limits to two terms
There is nothing to like about politicians.
I like the fresh outlook that many democrats seem to be able to take
we are strong on the small man and trying not to heart them and taxing big people that need to be taxed more and are not
They believe in having responsibility to the nation.
There is nothing appealing about the liberals in the Democrat party
They at least dont put our country in as much debt for something the people dont want.
no partial abortions,that is my main like.

Please try once more to think of something that you like about the other party.
The other party may be stronger in the comitment to the military.

Now, please tell me one more thing that you LIKE about the OTHER party:
I like that McCain is standing up against the health bill.
I like that they both have strong public voices.
Progressive approach to health care, rather than sweeping reform all at once.
They know how to play to the media well.
I have voted for both Democrat and Republican candidates so although I tend to lean more to the Republican side both parties at times are the other party. I believe liberals are concerned about the nation but their solutions - regardless of the party they are in are usually things which do not appeal to me.
They eat their own through purity tests.
they are more in favor of keeping jobs at home than the Republicans
When they earnestly try to work with the other party.
That they are so arrogant that they harbor no embarassment in their illegal activity. This arrogance comes back to bite them often.
I like when people from the other party change to my party
some of the biggest wingnuts in the party fly their freak flag proudly. They are mean spirited and evil but they don't pretend to be anything else.
More conservative than my party in several instances...I like that.
I can not say anything about the republican party only that I am disappointed in them
They are more effective regarding National Security.
I don't have another thing to qualify m feelings
They will all soon be out of a job! Novembers coming, Baby! And we won't forget!!!!!
I like how the Republican party is letting down on the social issues a bit.
The bills and appointments always manage to pass and/or succeed
They will squeel on a corrupt politician OCASSIONALLY. Of course, someone from the OTHER party.
Their religiousness, but not to the extreme that most of their members take it.
They seem to think outside the box more often.
More organized, both in terms of ensuring all party members vote on party line and in terms of strategy.
I like that when required they find a way to work with others.
Maybe they are more open to stem cell research.
Stop raising taxes and get more jobs here instead sending them over seas.
I am very happy without party afilations
because they have become so extreme it is easy to bet them
there just like the other party a bunch of back stabbing crooks
I don't particularly like anything about the other party. If I must say something, I will say I like the fact that Hillary Clinton is NOT President.
They seem to attract and represent diverse groups of Americans.
i dont like anything about the democrats
NOT ONE THING.ID LIKE TO HANG THEM ALL I HOPE THEY ALL GET VOTED OUT OF THERE JOB.
I'm not affiliated with ANY political party.
The party is useless and serves no actual purpose.
They advocate the right to bear arms. Even though I will never own a gun, I think it's necessary for others to defend their families and properties.
I like that they don't always agree with each other.
I wish some previous benefits would be reinstated as it was before
I like Joe Biden. He is a decent human being and doesn't seem to have an ounce of animosity in him toward anyone. He seems able to laugh at himself and his values are more to the middle.
They have an amazing ability to market themselves successfully - even if the stuff they are pandering are lies.
i,m not sure what some of the issue,s are recently i havent kept up lately
I can't think of a single thing since John McCain sold his soul to the devil in 2004.
They have some fiscal conservatives, Blue Dogs, who help slow down the spendthrifts who are bankrupting our nation.
no comments - they are both too negative these days
They want t protect the middle class from taxes
I cannot think of anything else that truly stands out anymore
less government intrusion into our lives
You don't seem to get the message I don't care about politics.
That some of the regular party members are looking now at their leadership with skepticism and distrust about their leadership's agenda.
I agree somewhat with their position on abortion.
I like that democrats and republicans agree on some major issues and are trying to make a half way stride towards
that about sums it up the efforts being made but not in the right direction
they are supposed to be for the constitution and American freedoms
I already told you that I do not like anything about the Democratic Party.
individuals that support social services
Willing to work with others to reach a consensus.
I do like the "smaller" govt concept and less govt spending/regulations
their are some conservatives that have good ideas
So far I have nothing that I can think of..Unless they start being a better loser and start working for all of us ,instead of themselves and the their reelection..boy is this going to get nastier than I have seen.Thanks Republians !!!
Once a gain I am comming up with nothing
At this time, there is nothing I like about that party. The do not even come close to representing the people.
the one thing would be that they at least see a problem, but have to throw money at it untill the republicans stop it.
I like how Democrats seem to be more concerned with the long term affects of our lifestyle today on people and the environment down the road. I like how Republicans would like to put faith in small scale government.
"President Barack Obama will be signing the Health Care as part of a medical coverage plan and this will help Americans who are in need of reformed health care".
They are not afraid to meet the people face to face, as in town hall meetings.
Stance on abortion tends to be freedom of choice
their ambition to make something for themselves
i like some of their more conservative veiws on taxes
again a blanket statement that needs nothing else
they like to shove their feet and shove issues on their errors under the rug, then try to pin it on the other guy
They can be a little ruthless sometimes. They fight fire with fire!
it is hard to come up with anything else
That they know where to buy good blonde hair dye.
their ways of getting things done, good or bad, but done period.
MY PARTY ALWAYS HELP THOSE WHO ARE LEST ALBLE TO HELP THEM SELF.
There isn't anything I like about the other party. I think they are evil
The republican party supports the rights of law abiding gun owners.
That the reps. are leading to there own extinction by being homophobic,racist and just all around ignorant.
they offer an example to refrain from especially spending tax dollars
They have made enough of the American populace frustrated and angry enough that they will most likely get voted out of office.
I don't like A thing about the other party.
they are on the better ideas of what this country needs right now
Republicans enrich the class system, which you have to admit, serves our country well. ALTHOUGH, some do get too GREEDY!!
I'm sorry I but right now I would be hard pressed to think of any.
I like how the democratic party focuses on education in the schools
They seem to have a louder voice than Democrats. They get heard more.
seam more for the av. person or should be
The other party does tend not to get carried away with awkward legislation
I am totally disgusted with the party of No. Obama was barely in office before the party launched an all-out assault as if to nullify the results of the Nov. 2008 election.
how liberal they are, they are taking our country by the tail and putting it in the trash. shame on them!
differens thing to fix and recovery the economy
Like I said, not a whole heck of a lot at the present time.
I agree with them protecting minorities but to a certain extent...sometimes it can be overdone.
Absolutely nothing to be found "GOOD" about the liberals in the democratic party
they believe in a womans right to choose
i will vote for the person and not the party

Please try once more to think of something that you like about the other party.
The republicans are economically practical
I sometimes like that they like to help the poor. However, I disagree 100% with their methods.
right now I dislike all the parties out there...no one can seem to get it...what this country is going through and has been going through for the past two years when is the end insight and when will the middle and lower class americans start to get back on there feet
My senator wrote back saying the he too was concerned about hunting from air planes.

Please tell me something IMPORTANT TO YOU that you LIKE about YOUR party.
They tend to support conservative principles.
I am not a stronge democrate I vote for what I think is the better candidate in the moment
They are conservative and usually display a faith in God. They don't forget where this nation came from. They listen to the people. They are not out-of-control spenders.
Marginally better focus on "the people."
Limit the size of government. Stop spending my great-grandchildrens money.Tell the truth and show some personal backbone.
We defend the representative government that makes this a Republic. And also keep government small.
Republicans are realizing they need to listen to the American people, not just the big interest lobbist.
It is a government by the people and for the people.
I am not affilated with any political party.
They at least talk about reducing the size of government (but don't always take actions).
They are providing many tax breaks/credits based on your purchases.
care more for the working class. they know that the little guy pays the heaviest load. accepting of different folks of different strokes.
I like that they want less government in the daily lives of american people. They promote capitalism.
While I do not agree with on the positions of the Republican party, I appreciate their commitment to individuals' rights and responsibilities.
They are opposed to the massive health care overhaul and all the bribes and the illegal procedures being used to try to pass the bill.
They strive to help out those who are unfortunate .
Has a mentality that people should work for their money.
It believes in the Constitution and supports traditional American values.
I like that my party cares about people and their welfare.
My party is rather conservative and not trying to spend every cent in the treasury.
I am an independant. This allows me the flexibility to choose people whose ideas and opinions are the same as mine without bias to party
not really follow or have any things that important except i like change
I am not dedicated to any one certain political party. I want politicians in the U.S.A. to honor the people that have been providing for this country over the last century. Not the people who just got here in the last decade. There are people that have lived here for over 60 years that can't obtain good health care. That is a crime.
Their mostly pro-life, conservative and christian
my mom always said if the R where in it was fammin if the D where in it was feast in this case they ca both go jump in the lake go down 3times come up twice
Nothing.I am not eligible to participate in paties.
we seem to analyze things carefully before reacting
Republicans have bettr family values,although these days it a tough party too defend t times.The Dems are just to liberal for me
I'm not involved in any "party". I decide on who to go with on how they handle the issues I look at.
I am currently identifying with the Independent party. We desperately need change. Eliminate the bickering between the two parties. I vote the man not the party. I don't need to declare my party line as an independent.
We are independents and go for the best person in our opinion. It could be from either party or someone else.
I like that the Democrats are trying to move towards progression not regression.
that we vote against abortion and healthcare
Conservative, has more moral value, reward the hard workers, not depend on government helps.
Right now not much...I will vote against my NY Congressman and my 2 NY Senators. Obama is a disaster. All talk and no interest in we the people's opinions. I think I wasted my vote.
Support of Electoral & ballot reform, Support motivating individuals to invest the time it requires to improve our government, to understand and debate the issues and to be impervious to the onslaught of bias media and marketing from the political extremes.
Democrats seem to be intersted in poor people and their needs.
to ensure we stay a Democracy with American values, is Conservative with belief in God. One that is strong and "respected" by the world, one with experience and the capabilities to deal with the issues at hand. This is not a Socialist or Communist Country, it is a Democracy, unfortunately the present administration is inexperienced and uncapable to run this country. We need to clean out the controllers of Congress and replace the present President with someone qualified. Obama is destroying this nation and all it stands for. He wants to be like "Chavez" and be the little dictator !
they normaly try to keep taxes and spending under control
I like that my party still incorporates the basic principles upon which America was founded.
they are fighting against this social health health care plan.
as a canadian citizen i can`t vote here i lean towards the democrats, i like president Obama,and think he`s working very hard to get this country on the right road.
Democcrats are more inclined to try to help low income people like me.
my party is libera and stands up for the average joe,
I like my representatives, both Senators and one house rep.
They are not pushing for bigger government.
A willingness to try to reach out and help people who are in need.
I truly do not like to single myself into one political party, not liberal not democrat, not republic or anything. politics is not a party to me.
The party supports education, health care, fair treatment of individuals, and being good stewards of the earth. It also supports reasonable conflict resolution.
I am really an independent who leans toward democrats. I like that the Obama administration makes the effort to be more transparent. I like that not all Democrats band together. That some democrats are holding out on voting in favor of the health bill for a public option does not bother me, that I can understand. I stand with the League of Women Voters and the AARP in supporting Healthcare Reform. I went to the AARP convention and was really pleased that Valerie Jarret and other top people in the Obama administration were there to answer questions. I think Obabma's attempt to have a meeting of the minds on television regarding Health Care was to be applauded.
not politically affiiated with any particular party I vote for individuals
I appreciate my political party trying to past Health Care for everybody
i like that they are for all people not just the rich
They are conservative with tax payers money
they are for helping the working class es of people instead of the richer class.
I'm a registered Democrat but I'm independent in my voting . I'm not liberal or conservative , I live my life without politics. I've been working since I was 15 yrs old. I vote in all elections and I vote how I want to vote. As for the party I'm registered at, It is out of control. Don't like any of it. The Republicans are just as bad , if not worse. I'm for term limits and lets start from scratch. Vote everyone out of office
I like that my party is not always out for itself...it understands that government should support its citizens so that they may prosper
I like the party's written platform. It's progressive, fairly ambitious, and uncompromising.
They support the free market approach by limiting the power of government to regulate and tax the citizens.
They don't build things with money we have to increase the deficit with and they still blame this whole mess on Bush. When the Republican say they can do things better and cheaper. I heard that 80% of people are dis-satisfied with the way things are going.
That's hard to do right now as a vast majority of our representatives, of both parties, act less like the statesmen/women they are supposed to be and more like squabbling children at the dinner table. It doesn't take a lot of smarts to recognize that SOME plan, SOME policy need to be enacted for the betterment of our country and it's citizens. To thwart progress due to partisan politics or personal ego is counter to the needs of our nation, I am an independant who leans republican, but quite frankly, I am very disappointed in our Leadership. I do not advocate getting rid of them but advocate changing the system (rules) by which they do business - within our current Constitution.
I like that the Republican Party is standing united against the current Health Care Bill "Obamination" which will, if passed, include the taxpayer funding of the mass murder of unborn children, and would massively increase the already incredible National Debt and deficit.
It is not the "party" that I support - it is the views of the individual candidates that are important to me.
Although I am not affiliated with a particular party, I currently favor the Democratic party because it seems more concerned about the needs of the average person.
Republicans do not want to take hardworking taxpayer dollars and give it to every welfare recipient in the US.
I'm an independant. I vote for the person and not the party.
Support of relatively conservative economic and moral issues.
Republican party is somewhat conservative.
I am an Independent voter. I am not for the bankers or corporations. I am conservative,not 'middle of the road'. I believe in buying as many products as possible that are 'made in America'. I don't believe in Universal Health Care.
my party is liberal & tries to help everyone
The party tries to help the middle class & the poor
they are trying to do what is best for this country.
I am republican. I like how the rebulicans handle things. I've always thought that they give more thought to consequences of their actions before doing anything, unlike the democrats. And the democrats think they are above everyone and can do what they want.
consideration for the poor. interested in fairness. acknowledges that the playing field is uneven.
they seem to be about smaller government
smaller government, reduced government spending, lowering taxes
It is important to me that the Republicans are more interested in promoting personal responsibility rather than just hand money to everyone for any reason what so ever.
It cares about the American people especially the poor and middle class.
I am non political - a democrat though. If that makes sense. I am very dim to what is going on around us and our state. I am very embarrassed to say that. Things going on now are stressful and depressing. I am embarrassed to say that I dont want to think about it... as it doesnt really apply to me.
pami obama esta tratando de mejoral las cosas aunque el cenado no le guste las cosas que el quiere a sel para los pobres
the important thing i like about the democratic party is it is the party of the peope.
I do not have nor do I want a party, I vote for the person I feel will do the best job for all of us and if everyone did and the media would be unbiased we would be in better shape.
they stand for ALL the people of the country
i dont really get into any party, i do not like politics.
-Less Government -Pro Life -Homeland Security -Energy (America produced) -Job/Employement (America jobs)
Right now, health care comes to mind first. I like the fact that my party is trying to reform health care.
I like my party because they are for the little people.
Nothing---- the political system has failed politians are for there welth &power
Conservative values, pro-life, low taxes,
It's independent of the democrats and the republicans. I can vote for the person whose ideals I can identify with.
I'm indepentdent who leans towards republicans. Enough with all the hand outs! People have to take responsability with all their remorgaging and buying foolish things they don't need with their equity! That's why we are in so much trouble with the forclosures and the bailouts. We need to think about social secutity!
my party cares more about the blue collar worker
Its inclusive and is concerned for people
My party stands for the rigts of the people. My party stands for small government and free enterprise. My party believes that it is up to the individual to succeed and that he or she has a right to keep what they earn. My party believes in the principals of our Founding Fathers.
I like my parties position on business, the economy, minimal government, and abortion.
Feminism and Gender Equality (green party)
I like that my party is open-minded, cares about those less fortunate, and does not cater to big corporations.
I'm independent and happy with the Scott Brown election in Mass
I have no preference of any political party. I prefer to vote for an individual whom I think supports my ideas and what is best for the country.
Don't know a lot about it...but they seem to be more for helping the people.
We stand for what is RIGHT and adhere to the CONSTITUTION.
I think my party tries to run the country a little better than the opposition. Hope that we can get something accomplish for the good of the people.
I am a conservative. Republicans are the more conservative party, although they do not do everything right. I like the Republicans because they are against the Health Care bill!
it tries to help the common people. as in the middle and lower income famileys
personally I think every politician is out for himself & couldn't care less about his constituents
I don't really identify with a political party, but if I had to choose, I would say Republican. I grew up in a generally republic family and I have strong Christian beliefs that also are why I tend to agree with Republicans.
I am really independant. I vote for Democrats and Republicans. I try to pick the best person for the job.
I don't identify with a particular political party.
I like that my party is willing to make change to help this country.
They are ready to take action on the problems that we are now facing
Care for the individual over the corporate
That they are for the middle class (the little guy)and not only out for big business.
Recognizing that people want them to be fiscally responsible. Recognizing that they were elected by the people, and thus are responsible for listening to the people.
I'm a registered Republican but I don't necessarily consider myself either a democrat or a republican. I vote for the person--NOT THE PARTY!
I like that th ey are not lying Democrats. Democratics will say anything to get what they want, including selling out the Constitution.
They are really trying to fix the bad situations that the past parties have made. People have a tendaceny to forget all of the things that went terrribly wrong so they think that a few months or years are going to fix everything. The repubicans hs so far give the new administration any help at all. All they ttry to do is tear them down.
I used to like the social awareness of my party, but lately am not very happy with most of their ideas!
they are conservative in their thinking.
To keep the dream alive,,,,a strong america
It is the political party for the working people
i do not identify with a party,i consider my self (other)
My political party is more conservative in its thinking and its spending.
That they want to get something started on healthcare where in the past it has only been talked about
I am not committed to any party although I am registered,I change my registration if I want to vote in a specific primary. In Arizona one cannot vote in primaries other than the one the party is registered in. I believe right now I may be a registered as a member of the Reform party.
that they are blocking obamas health care plan
My party allows for individual success. It rewards hard work and enterprise.
I always felt my party, stood more for the middle class people.
I am a republican. The reason why is because their views are more in line with my thinking. 1. Small government vs large government. small govt. is not as expensive as large govt. Less federal employees is lower taxes. The purpose of large government is to try and micromanage everything. As you know micromanagement only smothers growth. 2. Defense. Republicans are for a larger, well trained military force. We must be prepared to defend our selves and the best defense, if necessary, is offense. Those that are prepared stand a better chance of sucess. 3. Their family values are more in line with Christan values. If our country losses it's morale values, then our country will die, because no one will understand what is right from wrong anymore. Which makes law enforcement an oxy moron. Why enforce what is law today if tommorrow it is legal.
my party puts more emphasis on helping those in need!
I don't really conform to one political party.
what I like about my party (Rep) party is, against abortion,same sex marriages and gun control.against high spending high taxes and wanting to keep our freedoms from socialisum and comunisum if Obama has his way.
I say that I'm democrat but can find little good in either party.
right now I fall between Republican and Democrat. I am registered as a democrat but dont support everything they do. I really dont perfer either party.
We believe in working for what we get - no handouts to illegals or non-working "bums". No paid abortions, less government control, democracy not socialism or communism. As you can see, I am a conservative Republican.
Right now,I'm beginning to wonder. The bipartinonship is going too far. I have stayed loyal to my party because I felt they were above that.
trying to improve basic services for everyone in the country
I'm basically independent voting Democrat. They are just less worse than the Republicans. Much less worse.
Protects individual rights and asserts philosophy of individual responsibility and smaller government.
Was a democrat for over 40 yrs. Now a republican. I belive in God. Anti gay marriage, One wife, one husband, children all by same couple, full brothers, full sisters, only two sets of grandparents, same aunts, same uncles, family holiday get togeathers. I am not a hypocrite,i do not profess to being a member of any christian fate and also support abortion. The dems. want no such people. The repubs. will at least listen
do not affilate myself with a political party
They are againts chinging our current medical system.
They do not support the health care bill.
They are more conservative, and have the wishes and needs of the people at heart.
What is great about the political party that I identify myself with, is not having to choose any one particular political party.
I like that they are still fighing to get health care reform passed. It is something that we as Americans need to get accomplished.
The Republican party has been traditionally conservative-favoring less govt (interference hampering) of free enterprise-the very institutons that made USA a great country. Favoring systems that encourage hard work inititive and self-reliance to achieve sucess in life and country. DEMOCRATS LIKE OHBUMMER OPPOSE THIS INORDER TO GAIN THE POWER THEY SEEK.
the democratic party is not just for the rich and the very rich.
The Republican Party stands for smaller government and less intrusion in peoples lives. The party stands for the free market ideals and freedoms this country was founded on.
My party is very concern for the low income people
I am a registered independent. I favor less government not more: therefore. I lean toward Republican and Libertarian party positions.
Really nothing. My views aren't in line with their's at all. They're too conservative for my taste. I only am registed Republican because my father was and he was the mayor. It wouldn't have looked too good if I had registered for the opposition!
The Democratic Party cares about the individual people of the United States. It is very important to me that healthcare is available to every person and we are finally going to do that
That they favor helping businesses as opposed to individuals to get out of the current economic mess.
i am starting to have think about that myself.every thing is changing every day.
i am not an active member of either party i don,t believe either one cares about the people just gettine reelected so they can feed at the public trough
i dont follow or like politics i dont care
1) More labor friendly 2) Trickle up economics 3) For the most part they help the little guy
how they are trying to keep the cost of health care down.
I BELIEVE THAT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS THE PARTY OF THE PEOPLE.THE HEALTH CARE BATTLE IS A PRIME EXAMPLE.IT IS AN ATTEMPT BY THE PARTY TO GET COVERAGE FOR THOSE WHO HAVE NONE AND IT SOLVES PROBLEMS LIKE PRE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND IT ATTEMPTS TO CONTROL COSTS
Multiple views pushing for healthcare reform
They SEEM to look out more for my interests
I consider myselTf a Reagan democrat. that is, I am a conervative dem. Dont like what I am seeing re: healthcar4e
they hold to my views and are basicaly honest
It's slightly better than the party that I dislike
I think in my own party the representatives are more accessible
They are willing to stand up and vote no on a health care bill that is allowing other countries own our country and remove our freedom, what the United States has been from the time of the pioneers. They understand what is is to have family members die for our freedom.
It is worried about the future of this planet.
We stand for less federal government interference in our lives. Governement should come from the local level.
Smaller government, fiscal responsibility, strong American defense, no social justice programs, conservative values, not lying, and bribing like the Democrats.
They believe in less government interference in our lives.
My party identifies with the working class and tries to enact policies that would assist me with affordable healthcare and lower my taxes.
they dont believe in abortions, they believe in the constitution, and unlike the rest of the liberals in office. WE BELIEVE IN GOD. Conservative/Tea party supporter.
I am pleased with the tax deductables that they are setting up for next year.
I havwn't found to much taht I like about either party lately. Money seems both party only interest and looking after them selves
Currently, I like the fact that they don't agree with the Obama Health Care plan. I really think that there is great potential in the future now that Steele is heading the Republican party.
That the democratic party is more interested and compassionate about helping out the people in our nation--through programs like medicare, medicade, social security, welfare (which needs reform) and the just passed nationalized health care.
that lowering taxes increases economic activity.
Our beliefs create a strong bond that will start to change our country
It holds each person accountable for their actions. It believes in a true democracy, not the belief that we should pool all of the money of the working people and divide among everyone so that all can have equal lifestyles. They respect a person's right to choose who to help when they can afford it and not spend money of others who have worked hard for their future. They listen to their public.
Right now I'm not too proud of them. I don't like the way they are doing their job.
My party tends to stick to the Constitution, as it was written. They do not keep trying to change it.
I am not the knowledgeable about politics, but I think they wanted the healthcare bill.
They try to do what is best for the people of the US.
do good things for the lower income people.
I am with the Independent Party and there is not all the mud slinging accusations against each other like the Republicans and Democats. Stick to the issues that concern the people and the good of the country.
The conservative part of my party does not want to turn this country into a socialist republic.
We will see how well this health bill works. Right now I can't find anything I like about either party.
I love the idea that my party doesn't include that idiot president we have now
that they are more open to work with the domestic problems rather than go out and try to fix the whole world like they are God or better.
I dont know anything about politics. As long as they are resonable and think about the citizens FIRST, I support them.
I am an independent voter, I'm not registered with any party.
I like their business and immigration policy. I also like that they do not support handouts on governement tax dollars.
i'm a democrate that did not vote for Obama.I do not approve of what he is doing and think he will bring this country down.
They are interested in human rights for all human beings even unborn ones, they are against gay rights, and they are interested in our safety abroad.
nothing in perticular.just always voted dem.
I have no political party. I consider myself an independent, but I lean toward democrats. The liberal attitude to embrace the new and unknown. I believe in tradition but it should be a choice not a requirement.
I am very confused about politics so I really have nothing that I can think of at this time
most are productive citizens and most do not believe in big government
they tend to be more for the individual sanding on their own, and not making other people pay for their laziness.
I like the republicans for there conservative concerns of our country .I beleve they are wanting what is best for all.
i like when the presinent express his fills and thoses about thing things that need to be done!
as an independent,it is important for me to be able to make my own decisions and not based on left or right adendas.
Considers social ramifications of policy changes for more than just the upper class.
Has christian values Does not want to hand money out to people who do not deserve Wanting to keep what our founding fathers put into writing
A belief in people's ability to provide for themselves without government interference.
To be honest nothing really impresses me at this point
My party cares about all people but more for the people who don't have much,the poor. My party is Dem. The other party only thinks about the ones that have lots of money.
This is hard for me because I am not very political. I'm republican but don't necessarily have to vote that way after getting the facts.
conservative, mostly honest, listen to public more
i don't like anything about democrats or republicans. the next election i will be voting for an independant. dem or rep no matter they're all the same.
democratic party that looks out for all minorities
I have worked hard all my life,to have and enjoy th few things that I have, raised my children the best way that I could, taught them the values that we have in this Country ours..I DO NOT LIKE WHAT WE ARE doing now, in this Country, giving away what our PARENTS Grandparents and my generation have worked so hard to achieve...THAT'S WHY I CALL MYSELF AN Indepenant....
my party is against abortion and that's important to me.
They usually accomplish goals that they've proposed to us, the constituents.
things seem to be going in the right diredtion for the future.
there are probably more members of the Democratic party concerned about pollution, jobs in the U.S. and not elsewhere, and the well being of people (healthcare and wages) and not just themselves than with the Republicans.
The Democrats are much more willing to embrace change than the Republicans.
I like their moral and spiritual values.
Less concerned with spending, spending, spending.
IDONT HAVE APOLITICAL PARTY TO IDENTIFY WITH.
i likr the republician party, because it is for the most part pro-life, small government, pro traditional family, believe in supporting private charities with private personal funds, not government tax dollars, is pro america at all cost, does not blame the o.s.a. for the worlds problems, and finaly supports conservative christian values and supports the church.
I think they should be more concerned about the nation's economic problems instead of putting down the opposing party so much. They should get better leadership who can lead us into the future.
I am a Democrat, basically because my Father told me I was at young age, I realize that this is not a good reason to be a Democrat. I feel Democrats are for the working class people.
I do not claim to be a democrat nor republican. I would more likely consider myself to be federalist or libertarian. Claiming the federalist or libertarian party, I would say that it is important to me that "my" party does not participate in partisan decisions like the democrats and republicans do.
They, for the most part, try to safe our country money, instead of spending it. And with specific republicans in office, there have been huge leaps in decreasing the debt of the country.
I like the Democrats' pro-active approach to reform.
Interested in the public opinion, education& the economy. Try to follow the rules.
I like that I don't believe in choosing one party over the other. I like that I can choose from any party, there are more than just Republicans and Democrats. Unfortunately, the public and the media have forgotten this.
they are against the health care bill and they listen to the people.
some moral values strong economical sensibility mainly prolife
lower taxes, balanced budgets, deficit reduction, paying off national debt
seems like they are for the poor and working class people
im all for who ever is getting the job done.
I don't understand a lot about all that political stuff,but my party stands together most of them.
I am a registered independent because I like having the freedom to vote on the issues.
Currently nothing. I believe that the entire political systwm is corrupt
they care about the working man and not just big business
more conservetive then democrats pro life
I like Libertarians' views on drug laws.
they are trying to improve things in this country
i am an independent,but i lean toward the republician side after everything that has happened in the past year.fiscal conservatism,upholding the u.s.constitution,general morality,pro-life.
they really do consider us demecrats for who we are not just the wealthy people
The Republican Party values self control, personal responsibility, and accountability.
Well my party i like to meet new peoples and somethings positives things,such as allkinds of drinks and cake ,balloons ,music,.
I feel they are trying to make a lot of things better for all people. to benefit some releif on changes we all need to survive. and bring new ideals and comfort to us all.
I like that Democrats are open to new ideas.
I don't identify myself with any party. I don't vote.
illegal aliens deported not supported by tax payers
my perents always voted rep. and so do I
I like democratic because they're more about the people.
WHAT I LIKE ABOUT MY POLITICAL PARTY IS THAT IT SEEMS VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THE WELFARE OF ALL PEOPLE.
I dont like anything about them right now
they are trying very hard to achieve all they were voted in to do. I am happy with health care.
Anti abortion Believe in the Constitution
I like the fact my that my party identifies the same concerns and ideas that I do. I also enjoy that my party is looking for the same changes for the benefits and greater good for our country.
They want to make a change in the current government system.....I'm hoping that they do this sooner than later.
My party is interested in helping people (Economy),taking care of the poor (Healthcare), and making America a better and safer place to live.
I am fairly comfortable with it,but I tend to be an indepent
they try real hard to get out of the way republican thatis
my family was always a democrat so I went with the same dont have interest in politics
they are fighting this health care bill that we can't afford at this time.President Obama is moving to fast when our economy needs jobs and try to shrink the deficit.
The Democrates fined the $ that the Republicians take from the US citizens;the Democrate give the $ back to the citizens.It has always been that way.Maybe the Gov should pay back the $ to the SSI they took.
Strong core family values and religious values.
democrats and they look out for the little people
I like that my party did not vote for Obamacare
independant dont really get into politics
mostly they try to help the poor peoples.
They care about the entire population rather than just themselves.
Respects liberty and personal freedom, including the Constitution.
it seems that thay are for the people and not for corperate.
It is conseritive, not a liberal party that is interested in a socialistic and government controling country.
They are against Obama's health care bill
they are concerned about the working class and the senior citizens
Am an Independent . . . Do not enjoy politicians nor politics . . . Both parties have too much corruption & deception lingering in their brains to adequately resolve issus with a clear conscience . . . Really don't know how politicians sleep at night . . .
I am not sure that there is anything. I finally have my job back, but I do not know for how long. Many of the people in my company are still out of work. I think that it has more to do with luck than my "party".
I'M NOT WITH EITHER PARTY'S. I'M INDEPENDENT.
They try to help the people, not like the Replictions they help themselves
thy for the middle people the lower class

Please try once more to think of something that you like about your own party.
I'll like the moderate platform the party tried to follow from 1968 to 1996. Pay as you go, strong national defense, personal responsibility, smaller government, less entitlements.
They are trying to address the unemployment and economy
i like good convisation and getting alone.
I don't consider that I have a party. I vote indepedently.
I did think they were for the average person but I now believe they are only for themself
i thank the pres. has done very for the country so far.

Now, please tell me one more thing that you LIKE about YOUR party.
They tend to care about helping people help themselves
I don`t have any particular reasons for either party and concider myself a democrate because my parents were
They generally promote Christian values.
They are focusing on getting the middle class turned around.
they are for tougher laws on illegal aliens
Winning recent elections and getting ready to do well in November!
Their tendency to avoid enacting fast changes to historical precedents.
They care about helping the high poverty areas
Concern for the individual over business
Views of nominees to the courts is important to me. How the court system is to work and function.
I like that my party believes in education for all.
Historically the party has been strong for business and free enterprise.
I want Jerry Brown to be the boss of California.
I'm most sympathetic with their concerns.
The claim to want to balance our nations budget and cut wasteful spending
we're more conservative and don't just throw money at a problem
No special deals and favors No holding your feet to the fire candidates.
I like their ability to work for the greater good, not individual good.
Goal of 95% of campaign funds should come from the representative district.
Republicans are anti- Oboma's health care plan.
I like that my party does not cater to the minority.
they seem to care about the poor people.
I think I've run out of things. I like individuals. I like Alan Grayson. I don't really like my party that much these days.
They are taking a stand against liberal socialist leadership.
That they are more at the peoples level understanding what people are going through
Attempts to diminish violence and cruelty (i.e. less war, more gun control, less support for the death penalty).
My party believes in upholding the U.S. Constitution.
I am against these violent and dangerous attack weapons being on the street and most Democrats want gun control
Ihope my political party can create jobs so America can go by back to work.
they are for the poor people and children
I like that they are more open minded than the republican party
I liked when Howard Dean was the Party Chairman.
They support control of illegal immigrants at our borders and the return of illegals to their own countries.
They ran a more honest election. They are not in control of the direction the U.S. is going.(government control)
They are a little better than the other party.
I'm an independent. I want both parties to be more responsible.
I like that they are much more fiscally responsible, and generally socially conservative than Democrats.
? As I explained, it's not the "party" that I care about. If an alien from Mars seemed to hold the same views and values that I do, I drop any "party" ties and vote alien.
It is committed to health care reform which I feel is deperately needed.
Republicans do not want national healthcare.
I'm not connected to a party and proud of it.
Strong support of the US military and a strong foreign policy.
I am a 'Constitutionalist' and believe that our Bill of Rights should NOT be tampered with.
It doesn't kowtow as much to monied interests
seems to be more grounded in actual reality these days.
they seem to maybe spend less money then the other party
The members are pretty laid back,and listen to new ideas.
It does not denigrate people for their religious beliefs
Care about the American people. Especially the underserved and working class.
My party is more concerned with people than businesses.
que seves mas omilde que los otros y abla un poquito mas sensero
most of the time they they stand for social justice
It is more progresive overall than the Republicans.
They invite EVERYONE to to be a part of the party --- and mean it.
against increasing handouts for welfare and to illegals
My party believes that God endowed us with certain unalienable rights: Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
the integrity of its political candidates
It does not hide under the pretense of being "Christian."
Not much I like about either party these days. They are all in it for their own agendas and really don't care much about the citizens they supposedly represent
As I stated I do not have a specific political party. One thing I do look at who is contributing to the candidates,which I feel directly influences the way that individual will vote on issues related to those contibuters
more like me....how i think...what is important to me.
Conservatism has always stood against tyranny.
I like what they promise us, eventhough sometimes is impossible to achieve.
They do not spend money like the Democrats
it has helped the lower income and old survive.
the freedom to vote for whomever and whatever platform I support
I like "my party" because in general, they tend to tell the truth a little bit more than Democrats.
They stand up for the right things for everyone.
Like I just said—I don't identify with a political party.
I like who represents my state in government issues
They are trying to get the health plan passed
I don't necessarily like the Republican party over the democrats. I don't like the republicans in the State of Utah and I don't like the democrats on a national level. They are both so party oriented that they can't see a good thing that the other party proposes if it was right in front of their noses.
They think things through more and are less likely to follow the crowd.
Too many of them also lie and are unreliable.
they pick people who sound intelligent when they speak
They are hard working and are for the regular guy on the street.
Caring for others and helping the less fortunate.
this party works to improve the living standards in our country
It believes in smaller government, less taxes and stronger defense.
there nothing i can say i like about them or the way they are acting.
I like that my party expects people to be more responsible for themselves, make more of their own decisions, and not expect the government to "take care" of everyone like they were children!
That they have made history by having the first black president
It has been a party that had run candidates other than the typical Republican/Democrat standard preselected fare.
It is not thesame old tax and spend attitude
to persuade people to vote for what is best overall for the american people and not the party.
I summed it all up in my previous answer. I guess there is one other thing. Entitlements. Republicans understand the need to help people, but it must be done in moderation. Teach someone a skill then they will be able to feed themselves. Medicine is advancing very quickly. I can see the debate of the future. If a person kills all his brain cells by using illegal drugs, and our science is advanced enough to restore his brain cells; should we?
I think having only one chosen political party is a waste of time.
keeping my health care and try to correct it legally. Instead of behind closed doors late at knight.
They are supposed to be for the common people.
We have never had an illegal president like we have now. Why can't his true birth records ever be shown?????
not very likely to promote legislation that forces you to do things
Smaller government mean less government spending, lower deficits, and lower taxes.
It has morality and a open democratic slate. No one is locked out simply because they disagree
They mostly follow the Constitution, like the second amendment.
They think of the poor working class, and want to do what is best for them.They have compassion for other people,not just for them self.
I only rest.Dem so I can vote at the primary and gendal elections
What is also great about not being affiliated with any particular political party is the ability to decide on things on an as needed basis.
I like that they represent verying views. We are not all of one mind.
Again, I do not belong to a political party.
better social services like health care also better civil rights policies.
I like the way that they stand for lower taxes and for letting free enterprise work freely in our society.
As an Independant I like the idea that we put our country ahead of traditional party labels.
Nothing, like I said their views are too conservative.
Our stance on communication with our "enemies" instead of shooting first and asking questions later. (foreign policy)
Opposed to the current health care plan proposal.
thinking about changing.still thinking about it.
as i said just a moment ago i don,t belong to any party i am an independent neither party is worth a toot
For the most part they seem to know business running un checked will hurt the common good.
MANY OF THE BENEFITS WE HAVE TODAY ARE HERE BECAUSE OF DEMOCRATIC SUPPORT LIKE SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE WHILE NOT PERFECT WHAT WOULD THE WORKING CLASS DO WITH OUT THEM
I am not bombarded with literature that is always negative in nature
It has always wbeen the working maans party.
I really have no care at all about politics.
They do not b.s. the p3ople like the present president.
The at least know what they should be doing whether they do it or not.
It is like the republican party without the hypocrisy and the democratic party without the self destruction.
Favors limited govenement and protecting the rights of individuals
I think their literature is more believable
they are usually honest law abiding people
In all the years past they have never spent and printed money like there is no end or bottom to the amount availabe. In the last year all our costs have risen and we did not receive any social security increase to cover heating, electricity and food costs.
It is still small and somewhat powerless
We believe in less taxes on the federal level.
willingness to solve healthcare, listening to the people, the constituents
For all not just a small demographic of he people
Like like to think that they are conservitve
I like that they are mainly conservative and opposes same sex marriages. They value religion and hopefully support moral values centered legislations.
That we are more favorable toward pro-choice
They're more interested in getting things done rather than spewing why they couldn't do this or that. They believe in voting to accomplish something big, such as the health care bill, which is a bunch of crap being shoved down my throat!
My party is a little more fiscally responsible and also seems to follow a moral "high ground".
They're more interested in helping the middle and lower classes.
concern for those in need of health care
Maybe there is someone in this organization that is better suited for the government job.
have different kind of food just enjoy the people at the party
They defend the constitution and our freedom.
Anti illegal aliens compare to Democrats.
in three more years we the republicans will get rid of that idiot
they don't like liars. They don't make deals with the President of the United States when the citizens of our country are at stake.
Generally they believe in the same things i do.
i do not like anything that the democrates are doing now.
I've already said what I like about them.
they are for smaller government normally.
well i really dont no any thing elase to say but i can tell u that i dont celubrate things of that matter there are is one thing that i can say is that obma is really trying to make a diffince!
They are trying to make more jobs for us.
believes in one man and one women marriage and are against abortion
We are weark right now i cant think of anything i honestly like
They are for the people all people black ,white and the other races,with mone and without.
I have opinions on both sides so I like being neither.
they all wine about the other party but they're are all the same.
They do not want to make America, a socialist Country...
There doesn't seem to be much "mud-slinging".
not sure how true this is, but it seems the Democrats are a little less influenced by those that really run the country; the wealthest.
Barack Obama genuinely sesm to care about making the US a better place to live for all its citizens.
I just wrote the main thing that I like.
most republicans believe the bible, and believe the god of the bible shoild be worshiped not the state.
They in general reflect my piont of veiw. How ever I do not vote down party line's.
It is for the people and want less government intrusion into the American people's lives.
They seem to be more flexible then Republicans however I do agree with some of the issues the Republican party votes against like the resent health care reform.
I like that my party is not funded by lobbyists.
Most Republicans are supporters of the right to bear arms which is extremely important to me.
I like that the Democrats are somewhat reasonable in their platform, opposed to the radical conservatism displayed by the Republicans
? Can't think of anything else! I'm not happy with any party right now.
I like that they look to reduce govt involvement in most of everyday living
They stick to our traditional values and are not going against the constitution.
seem to really listen when you talk and understand
i like the way obama is handling things sofar.
I don't feel prewssured from by the major party candidates.
they represent the views of the majority of the American people
the candidates are willing to stop and fight for what they believe in
very sincere and caring people to our people
The idea that each of us is to maintain control of his/her resources.
I,Willie Birten likes about my party Is havings ;cake,softmusic,meetings new peoples.
They fight hard for what they beleive in.
I also like that Democrats have a strong sense of party and are willing to help each other.
the old health care! we have worked for our insurance now we pay for everyone.
most of my party has been in the srvice one time or the other
I like that we now have the first black president.
THE CONCERN FOR HEALTHY CARE FOR ALL AMERICANS
I like that they are trying to reduce the deficit. And help small businesses ;create more jobs to help decrease the unemployment rate.
if i have to pick i would say better health care or better health coverage for everyone
I like that they listen and take interest in the little people and their concerns and ideas and not just how big your wallet is.
i was happy that in my generation they elected other then a caucasian president.
My party is fair and willing to work with others.
I believe there are honest as they can be having to deal with those less than honest democrats
that they stuck together on these issues.
they seem to be mour down to earth.comon.
don't try to tax you for every little thing
they just passed a good health care bill
I vote for the best candidate regardless of party affiliation.
it looks out for everyone not only themselves
nothing I have lost all faith in our elected officials
Their position on things like the war and education match with my own.
Often reflects the majority of Americans' opinions.
I'm just observing, don't have a political party.
It is anti-abortion and limited spending and giving more control to the states.
on till now it care more about the buget
Everyone in Washington, D.C. is tnere to represent themselves, not their state. They are interested in the perks they get at our expense!!
they aren't trying to turn our country into the former USSR.
I TRUST THE INFORMATION THEY ARE GIVING US IS THE TRUTH
It does the right thing and work for middle class people.
Nothing! I am dissappointed in Obama. I regret voting for him!
I COULD TAKE OR LEAVE IT JUST LIKE THE POLITICIAN....
My party is "strong on Defense" but not warmongers......

Please try once more to think of something that you like about your own party.
have already told you I do not have a party
feel like there is more freedom to the people
that by hard work you can get ahead in this lifetime.

Please tell me something IMPORTANT TO YOU that you DISLIKE about the OTHER party:
Currently "ruled"/lead by self-described "progressives" who are interested more in their own socialistic power than in truly helping people
I fell it`s like the old mens club if you disagree with them you don`t matter and your opinion doesn`t matter
They do not believe in the sanctity of life.
Marginally less focus on "the People" and more on special interests.
Yhey don.t seem to hear what the voters are telling them--they think we are stupid.
I really like being in touch with reality. They seem to dislike it.
Nothing is ever their responsibiity whether it be to take action or pass the blame
They tend to try to be the provider of happiness, rather than the protector of the right to pursue it.
they seem that they are not for the people
They seem to focused on preventing certain things from getting passed. Are always in disagreement with the other party.
how they are trying to shove this healthcare program through
Ridiculous leadership in both houses of Congress!
they think bottom line. have no idea of what is to be a person of limited means and so limited access. too white male and old
They don't care about what the people want. they have their own agendas and will do whatever in necessary to reach that goal.
Their policies that enforce the idea that people are owed something by the state.
They believe the answer to everything is to spend more money.
That they believe that everything revolves around money money money! And if u don't have it ur not important
Too willing to go into debt for (what I view as) non-priority initiatives.
Focus on business - can hurt the individual
They are intent on destroying the America we love.
Many in the party have a very pro-abortion and pro-gay marriage agenda. I do not mind liberal, but there seems to be an in your face push for these two issues.
I dislike that they use fear and intimidation to control people.
I'm concerned with the over spending so as to fund health care and stimulate the economy.
Government is there to solve all our problems.
not all political parties are looking for the best interest of the country. They are looking out for their own best interest
I dislike things about all political parties.
They spend money this country doesn't have
there rich i am not cant afford to be a R
The Democratic party doesn't listen to what the voter wants. Democrates constantly vote in government control bills to.. (as they claim) help the struggling poor.
What I don't like about either party is they both are self serving instead of trying to look out for the best interest of the country.
The Dmocrats in Washington do not care what the people at home want , they are going to vote as they please and how best to help themselves
I don't like the fact that they are really just a bunch of rich people trying to make more money at the detriment to this country, while pretending to what? Care?
The other side is just as bad. Their plan to to no work with Dems so that Reps can win mid-term elections.
I dislike that the other party seems to give support to illegal immigrants.
C onservative ideology, as well as its beliefs the religious right.
attempt to ram healthcare reform down or throats even though the vast majority of American people disapprove. If this passes you will see a change in Congressional leadership in the very near future
they are a tax and spend party and go big govenment
The other party focuses on too many insignificant factors and not enough on truly important issues.
the stiff necked attitudes.Nancy Pelosi and her i'm better than God attitude.
Republicans seem interested only in helping the rich get richer
They only care about winning, no matter what the cost.
They are arrogant liars who are not interested in the good of the country.
I especially dislike the way it has moved from mostly moderates to a party publicly controlled by ultra-conservatives.
I hate the partisanship and gotcha politics. However I think both parties are guilty of this
The other political Party should try to work together with congress and President to create and health care.
they are for the rich man and them selfsthey do not look out for the poor people and children
I dislike that they don't support equal rights and they don't support funding for the arts
They're racist. They barely even hide it these days.
They promote abortion, believe the government should control commerce and encourage open borders.
They are going to make the government bigger. Just look how they can't even keep all the democrats on their side and all the unhappy people at tea parties or now they are threatening to pull something where they don't even need the house of Republican vote. What happened to the three part government check system our fore-fathers developed?
I dislike that the Democrats are trying to force their Health Care travesty down the throats of the American people.
The candidates that I do NOT vote for are those that undermine what others would call "traditional family values" and increase government involvment in our private lives.
It seems to cater more to wealthy people's interests.
Democrats like Nanci Pelosi and Barack Obama are some of the most disgusting Americans to hold office in our nations history.
Seems to be only one course of action, a my way or the highway mentality attitude.
Their willingness to not use sound economics. Their desire to move our country further down the road to a European style of socialism.
Many Democrats are too liberal and don't support the 'Right to Life' movement They want to change our Constitution and take away many of the rights listed in our Bill of Rights, such as our Freedom of Speech and our Right to bear arms.
republicans are only thinking about themselves and don't help everyone
Well, for one, most democrats make a bad name for themselves. They make promices during their campaign, then never follow through on them. Not only that, but Bill Clinton cheated on his wife. Should someone like that have run the country? Hell no.
refusal to engage with people over the facts on the issues. dismisses and labels disagreement as unpatriotic. constant hyperbole. too closely associated with a particular religious ideology.
Big government, they want there hand in everything
The other party wont listen to the other side,and they never have an idea to back up what they say is wrong with the other side.
They give too much money to people who do not work or try in any way to improve their own lives.
Care only about Corporate interests and the rich and well connected.
son enganyosos enbusteros lo que piensan en como a sel se mas rico a costillas del pobres
the replublican party doe not try to work with my party sometimes
The way they twist the truth and take everything out of context
they call anyone with a view differant from theirs "un-american"
Too liberal - want to solve everything with government
-Views on War/Homeland Security -Dealing with Media -Big Government
They are for the rich and powerful, not the people.
They have always pandered to and tryed to help the rich who really don't need the help.
Pro-abortion, environmentally extreme, favor illegal immigrant support, pro-taxes
I cannot identify with a blue-collar party.
Their constant attacks on the middle class via tax increases
It refuses to participate in governing by refusing to negotiate tough issues
They talk about making the government smaller and keeping the government out of our personal lives, but when they get into power, they grow the government and spend money like they always talk against. They want no government in people's personal lives until it comes to abortion and homosexuality, this is very hypocritical
The other party believes in big governement and a welfare state. The other party believes that government should control our lives and our businesses. The other party believes that the masses are ignorant and will forget the wrongs they are doing.
I dislike their entire philosophy of entitlement. They think the government needs to control everything and that the government can give without taking from someone else.
It appears that the Republican party is now more concerned with attacking other parties, cultures and opinions rather than working on solutions.
The other party caters to big business and are closed-minded when it comes to making our country better.
Just commented on that in the previous box. Again, both parties only care about themselves. They don't care about the people,
Campaign constributions and the pressure to vote along "Party" lines.
seem to spend to much on non-people related stuff...like military, or foreign stuff..wars.
Too many people in my party act like they belong in the other.
Itseems the other party is trying to run our private lifes, which in my opinion is not right.
they seem to be for big companies that surive by keeping the working people down. as with mininium wages.
With Democrats I do not agree on the public health care idea.
The rich do not understand how poor people really live and they sometimes make wrong decisions for some people.
conser. on gay rights and abortion issues
Both the Republican and Democratic parties are in bed with corporate interest. Democrats pretend not to be and Republicans just lie about it.
The other partys are all for doing nothing to change and make things better for are country.
I dislike the fact that they don't support some of the issuses but they don't have a better plan to solve the problems
Desire for short-term gains at the expense of long-term problems
On the national level, I think the Democrats are too far power hungry and they are trying to shove legislation that the people don't want down our throats!
I'm not as religious as some of the people in my party. I don't believe in hitting people over the head with religious beliefs.
they pick pick poor speakers to represent their parties
They do NOTHING to help the present administration and try to constantly undermine anything that is trying to be done
Too conservative and not interested in helping the less fortunate.
arrogance, not listening to the people's voice of what they want, lie
Republicans are fascists. Democrats are socialists.
the other party goes to extremes to scoff at, demonstrate against, shout at and put down anyone who disagrees with it.
Higher taxes, more government, more welfare
they seem to be interested in whats good for there political party,not the interets of the economy or the people
The other party doesn't truely respect life, born and unborn, as well as they want to make all the decisions for everyone making the people more and more reliant vs. being stronger, hardworking and responsible individuals!
That they are willing to pass the healthcare bill without weighing all options
Republicans seem to be dedicated to keeping us busy fighting wars to keep the nations economy afloat. Democrats seem to be dedicated to socializing America and forcing everyone to pay for what a self proclaimed leadership elite believe everyone should have. Meanwhile they sit in government jobs totally dependent on making sure everyone needs something in order to perpetuate their employment.
: freedom : H. Clinton : Pelosi : throw a rope only half way to the needy
They reward failure and lack of effort with increased benefits
other party say what they want the people to believe, and not always what the health bill, for instance, truly means or includes.
They seem very much the same these days.
They want larger government. They think peace is obtained with talking, and military force is never necessary. Thus, smaller military. They love entitlement programs because it puts more people under their control. Like a parent, spoiling a child. The child will favor the parent that gives them everything. It doesn't help the child grow. Their morale values and beliefs are not like mine.
keeping money in their pockets, instead of helping everyone.
thier against everything this country stands for.all the soldiers and people who died to keep this country free and they are tearing it a part! If its up to them our american ways will be gone.They are headed down the road to socialisum and dictatorship.
Hi morals are important to me and neither party seem tohave them.
They are ramming healthcare down my throat!
Rights Everyone should have rights to do anything they want in the US
Too much government control, too many handouts to undeserving people, president who bows to foreign leaders, abortion rights, not listening to the majority of citizens.
ignore the constitution especially after taking an oath to defend it
Not trying to earnestly debate the issues and not worry about votes.
Rich people protecting their own interests rather than thinking about the country as a whole.
Panders to the mob mentality, and wants bigger government to make decisions for people and their money.
i personally belive that they have played the biggest role in the death of innocence to our children, especially girls with their support of nudity. endless talk of abortion, t.v. reaking with filth, graphic sex, etc. etc.
They support illegal immigrants having medicare; medicade, and social security benefits.
They believe in too much centeral government.
I have no problems with any party it is the only way you get to vote
There will always be something to dislike about one particular political party even if you do not identify yourself with one particular.
They get one oppinion and everyone is expected to believe that way. All in or all out.
OHBUMMER WANTS TO GIVE AMNE3STY TO THE LAW BREAKIG ILLEGAL AILIENS WHO HAVE RAPED OUR LOCAL ECONOMYS WITH THEIR 5TH COLUMN INVASION. AL GORES BOUGUS PLAY ON GLOBAL WARMING (BASED ON HOAXED DATA AND OUTRIGHT LIES) IS OUT TO WRECK OUR ECONOMY AND CRIPPLE OUR STANDARD OF LIVING AND ALL US BUSINESES THAT TRULY PROMOTE VALUABLE JOBS AND OUR NATIONAL FUTURE. BOUGUS DEMOCRAT SCHEMES DO NOTHING BUT CREATE MASSIVE WELFARE DEPENDENCE AND MASSIVE REVENUE LOSSES THAT IN TURN DEMOCRATS ALWAYS TRY TO REMEDEY WITH MORE AND MORE CRIPLING TAXATION RIPOFFS ON THE WORKING LEGAL CITIZENERY.
length of political campaigns for any party.
Can't understand why they keep giving more and more money away, when this country is in such bad shape and in such debt
the war in iraq and afganistan. the BUSHES. both father and son. i can't stand dick CHEANY....
I truly detest how the Democrats stand always for bigger and bigger government. To them the government is always the answer no matter how many times it has been proven to fail and be totally inefficient.
The Democratic party seems to want to tell people what they need. They are a party leader down to the people rather than a party of the people who tell their leaders where to go. It is "We the people..." The Democratic party seems to think the leaders can tell "the little people" what is good for them.
The Republican party seems to side with big corporations, giving them less regulations, and also handing them huge tax breaks.
the other party always think they know everything and want to put the other party down.
They don't place enough emphasis on personal responsibility.
the democrats are not for us but for there socialist buddies now the republicans are for themselves not for the american people all they do is pay lip service to us
People no longer believe in absolute truth.
1) they say "cut taxes" what they mean is cut taxes for the super rich and big business. 2) dirty politics. 3) hipocracy 4) filling the pockets of the big businesses with money taken from public programs
THE REPUBLICAN PARTY IS AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN THE PARTY OF BIG BUSINESS.LESS TAXES ON THE RICH MORE DEBT TO THE BUDGET NOTHING FOR THE WORKING CLASS
Need to take time to get health bill correct instead pushing
Seem to be more willing to stretch the truth on some subjects
They only care about their own rich selves.
being a libertarian, I do not believe either the democratic party or the republican party represent voters. They both bow to their foreign owned overlords.
Support for immoral values such as abortion and homosexuality.
they do not always vote in the house or Congress they way their people want them to
Goverment Overspending, giving wealth to thoses that will not work for income, spread the weath around. Bailing out companies, the banks were bailed out and yet they have raised my interest rate on my credit card that I have not missed a payment on 3%. Illigal aliens that receive free health care at the emergency rooms, and recieve payments from all the government agencies that assist those in need.
Which other? The helpless Democrats or the racist and selfish Republicans?
They are for federal government having a larger role in our lives.
the lack of transparency, dishonest, not listening to the people
They believe the government is the answer to everything.
The other party is too conservative and likes to keep things at the status quo.
They're librals, they believe in themselves. They dont believe in GOD.
more interested in big buisness und highest income groups
how thay bail out the banks and the will not help pepple out.
I have real problem over the pork spending by both parties
I don't like the health care reform that they are advocating. I also don't agree with their views of widening a lot of social programs. The US can't continue to support and give out free money at the expense of the middle class.
That most of the ways that the republicans want to balance the budget are by slashing spending for important programs and that they are for helping the rich people of the country stay rich.
that their platform seems to tax the rich and give to the poor! Too much government influence in our lives.
No goals except power, which fortunately is the case
They love to talk but they don't like to listen IF it doesn't agree with what they want!
They had 8 years to do something and they made matters worse. Now all they do is critize what this party is doing.
The other party seems to want government to control our lives. They seem to be taking away our freedoms.
They seem to be more interested in the upper class.
I don't think they wanted to pass the healthcare bill
take a stand that tends to help wealther people
Need to vote how you really think as a person for the issues at hand instead of the majority of the party
Republicans seem to be all about the money they can earn for themselves.
they say a lot of thing that i dont agree with
They just ruined my freedoms and voted to make this a communist country by passing the unconstitutional health care bill.
that we don't have enough in the senate and congress
They will do whatever it takes to get the job done!!!! make deals & lie
The 2 partys are just about same , theifs !!!
They stand for everything i don't believe in.
They promot programs to extend jobless benitifts, reduce taxes on low income and offer susidies for housing to low income.
i think the republicans are acting like they have more sene than the democrates/
no likes or dislikes.when it is time to vote,I do it
Their conformist attitude. That values and tradtions, some that are over hundreds of years old, should be enforced in this new century.
they tend to be enablers for peoples bad habits.
i dont like how diffent political party try to put down a another becuse on think thy are better are can more!
They keep trying to stop anything, that we try to do.
Only considers how changes affect the upper class
The OTHER party is against a woman's right to choose / abortion.
They want to give some much of our money away and to people that do not deserve such as people who do not want to get jobs or who just will have children to keepe getting a hand out. To tear away at what our country has fought hard for by taking the Lord Jesus Christ out of all of the countrys things such as schools etc.
Since I don't identify with either, I'll give the answer that applies to both: both parties' canidates are liars, it's a matter of voting for who you think will screw you over the least.
We are weak to afraid to stand up for what we believe in
They look down on people who don't have much.And talk about us has if we don't have any rights.You don't have money you nobody.
it goes to far to an extreme making it hart to get anything done.
they are all puppets from the builderberg group.
They seem to always oppose what my party has put "on the table".
the Republicans want less government so the wealthiest can pollute and siphon of money for their own pockets; this could be from charging more for cheaper products, profits from banks that gobble up assets from other banks or businesses, to dicking with people's own homes and retirement funds.
The Republicans are unapologetic plutocrats. Their agenda is to maintain the status quo, under which the GOP's leaders prosper and the country suffers.
They are getting further and further away from things this country was founded on and those things are the reasons this country prospered for so long.
THE STATE THE NATION IS IN DUE TO THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION
They want to tax and spend, giving to illegals and slackers while dismanteling the morals that made this counrty great.
they are prodeath of the unborn, blame america first for the problems of the world and make me feel ashamed of my own country, and the democrat leadership worship the state and turns a deaf ear to the god of the bible,
The denacrat's lean to much for BIG GOVERMENT. I dont need big brother to tell me what I can eat and soforth.
They want the government to be too involved in the American people's lives.They take away the private individual's initiative to live their lives as they wish.
I cannot give you anything specific accept that they seem to be out for themselves and people that have money.
They want to turn our country to socialism, without using that word. They want to remove our ability to make independent decsions about our own lives.
Most Democrats do not want you to be able to defend yourself with a gun, and want to take them away. I compete in gun-related activities and own one for protection, and I feel like I am a responsible and clear-headed individual. I don't kill people, and my guns do not kill people, so it is ridiculous that they trying to take them away from me.
I dislike that the Republicans feel it is necessary to try to control the personal lives of citizens on issues such as abortion and gay marriage.
I believe that the two prominent parties have completely lost touch with the democratic process and that they are to serve the people of the United States.
I dislike the expansion of entitlement programs
over 80% of the people have said no health care reform and obama acts like he is deaf and dumb. he only cares about what he wants. I think when a President is elected and he does not follow what the people want he should be impeached from office.
lack of moral values can't make decisions and when they do don't even know why not competent
they oppose increased military spending and the display of the Ten Commandments in public buildings
Well,for the other party to be so bullheaded about every thing is unheard of if McCain would have won it would not be a problem.
I don't identify with either the Democrats or the Republicans because because neither party listens to their constituents.
The recent health care take over was voted in when over two-thirds of us don't want it. The law like the stimulas is unconstitutional.
they are too much for the big guy and not so much for the little guys that keep the wheels turning. without them business would come to a screeching halt
They believe that abortion is not murder.
for murder of babies for big govt. welfare for the lazy, takeover of our health care
Supporting an unconstitutional healthcare bill.
I dislike republican and democrat views on medicinal marijuana
they are not willing to take the blame for their own actions
too far to the left,too liberal,too much tax and spend,too controlling,too much big gov.,immoral,dishonest,breach of promises,back-room deals,in it to win it,disreguard of the people,disreguard of the constitution,pay-offs,chicago politics.
They dont seem like they are willing to work together on important issues we need to focus on.
I dislike that Republicans have out-dated points of view and are not very open-minded.
independents are marginalized in the existing arcane two party system we have in the US
they write bills and then omit themself from it.
Always seems to be some type of political scandal.
I thank everythaing in the U.S.A. is getting wourse.
I don't like that they go against religious laws.
the ri9ch get everything and middlecvlas are disappearing
WHAT I DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE OTHER PARTY IS THE CONSTANT FIGHTING WITH THE PRESIDENT.
The country is a mess and dont like any political party
I wish that they would work together toward making everything posible for the people for the american people.
i really dont know except they are against health reform
I strongly dislike that the other party seems to base their ideas and descisions only for what is in for their best personal gains. They think more of and for themselves
They do not see or address the problems with the country, until it is to late.
Republicans always think they are right and everyone else is wrong.
Having two parties is good. I don't dislike them
that they are doing to many things under closed doors.and that their leading this country in the wrong direction.It seems to me that we are losing our freedom of choice.
The other partys are ot to stop anyone in office,for their own gain to get in office,no matter what it takes.
The fact they continue to bring down the public and get the media to swing events into chaos and finger pointing. This disruptive behavior creates fear and surely will be intended to bring about other things
They want to expand government. They want redistribute wealth. I'm for helping the weak and poor but not for being forced too.
republicans are up set and the wont put their differences aside for the greater good of the usa
all the time on health care and not on getting the people getting back to work
some elected politicians support abortion
they mostly try helping only their own kind.
They seem very resistant to working on a compromise rather than just grabbing for their own opinions.
Increasingly moves to the socialist, big-government mindset.
Well the way things have been going lately I don't sense any loyalty no trust. Everyone just want what they want and don't really give a d___ about the lesser folk or the programs that are really needed. Its a MESS
willing to abort children without the thought of the fact that it is murder.
it is for corporate owners and for them getting all the tax brakes
They are soft on national security and have no interest in standing forcefully against our enemies.
Nobody is there to represent the people who (sadly) elected them.
donkeys and elephants create conflict more than they desire resolution. they want to be right rather than helpful to the folks that got them elected.
I thank sometime they don't listen to the people when they speak.
THEY SEEM MORE CONCERNED ABOUT THE PEOPLE OF THE HIGHER CLASS INCOME BRACKET.
None of the political parties can be trusted. No one is there for the people anymore!
I DISLIKE THE OTHER PARTIES DUE TO EMPTY PROMISES AND THEIR HIDDEN AGENDAS LET'S SEE WHEN PRESIDENT OBAMA IS GOING TO SLIP???
They only help those that are in their-political party the most.
They've been reduced to a party of liars and manipulators.....
thy naver give or raise your wage for the cost of liveing

Please try once more to think of something that you dislike about the other party.
I really do not like the Speaker of the House and her tactics. This is NOT a gender based criticism.
They think they can save the world with voting for this program or that but where is the money coming from to inforce these bills?
they dont want the economy to get better, oppose everything that is benefical to the american people.
I don't know enough about this to do this survey. I an not answering this one.
sarah palin - says many nonsensical things
I dislike all the arm-wringing, deal-making that went on to get the health care bill passed.

Now, please tell me one more thing that you DISLIKE about the OTHER party:
Tend to engage in the "politics of personal destruction" - not interested in working with others that they don't agree with.
I just don`t feel that they can be trusted
They regularly say one thing,then to the other.
Priorities are out of order and their tactics defy logic.
Want to spread the wealth but not willing to work for the income
Past republicans put our country in deficit
They tend to think government has to protect people from themselves.
They seem to be more concerned about making the rich richer versus helping out the middle and lower classes.
If you say anything about the president that you don.t agree with him then your a racist
they're hypocrites in the meanest sense of the word.
They feel that government can fix everything and that spending more and more money is okay.
Their current attempts to make wide reaching changes without first taking the time to see whether or not the current flaws with the system can be fixed through less drastic measures.
They believe that bigger government is necessary to run all aspects of the country.
I dislike this about both parties--too much trash-talking about the other side rather than getting things done.
It says it's for smaller government but government gets larger whenever it's in power
They are power hungry and spend money like it's water.
Different view of how justices are to judge from the bench.
I dislike that they have no compassion for anyone but themselves.
They are liberal in their policies to the extent that taxes are going to have to be raised.
Keep taxing the "haves" until they become "have nots".
Their large menu of detestable things, ideas, people, others.
The failure to be the most open administration and the corruption
Democrates seem to use tactics for votes.
The outright deceit that goes on during elections.
They reward the lazy and irresponsible people by giving them so much assistants.
They try to keep the rich from paying taxes yet want to tax the poor to death
Obama, Clinton, Shuler, Reed, Pelosi,Kerry and many other distorted members of this general group.
Democrats want the health plan to be put into action.
The other party has completely disregarded what the American people want.
They refuse to listen to the people . It's a power struggle and they are dammed to have it their way careing not, for the rights of the people's voices. They seem to want to be a dictatorship governorment.
they don`t seem to go along with anything the other party suggest.
they only are interested in obstructing President Obama.
It's filled with selfish people who only care about themselves.
I don't know anything about the other party.
They intend to topple the very foundations that this country was founded upon. They intend to take away my freedom.
Too much focus on religious/Christian values when there should be a separation between church and state.
I dislike the way the other party is attempting to dismantle public education.
The political party must learn to work together so we can get this country back on track again.
they like to start wars and get the men ane women killed for nothing
they pass la2s that favor big companies.
tendency to blame our country for a lot of worlds problems
that they are only looking out for themselves
They're classist. A bunch of rich white bastards who aren't able to comprehend that the institutions they've created are not fair to non-rich white bastards.
I don't pay a whole lot of attention to the governmemt cause I am a little voice, I only know what I hear and the 700 club or Russ Linbaugh never say Anything good about O'bamma. I hear him blame Bush for giving him this mess but I disagree with him on the 7 or 8 Trillion dollar deficit.
Trying to pass the health bill. Paying off people to get the bill passed.
That they are generally pro-abortion, fiscally totally irresponsible, left wing intolerant elitists who think that te way to disagree with people is to ridicule them.
they give our taxs money to others countries which they should use it for health care for everyone
THEY ARE TRYING TO KEEP US FROM GETTING OUR STIMULIS CHECKS.
I feel that it is doing its best to deter health care reform.
Democrats are so fiscally irresponsible it is scary.
They won't solve our countries problems.
trying to turn the nation into a communist dictatorship
Are moral relativists when it comes to social issues.
Unethical actions by some of its members.
They are leaning more and more towards a totalitarian, socialist form of government.
They are like lemmings,and are easly led astray.
Only taxing te rich will not generate more income for the federal government. It will only cause companies to increase their fees to all of us, including the poor.
They have no balls. They need to stand up to the opposition.
por los muchos que an muelto en la gerra por un enganyo y enbuste de busch porque quiere el petrolio y ustedes sabe que su famillia de el son petroelros
they always try to put anything that goes wrong on us
How the elitists in the parties stick together and how they kiss the asses of celebrities that could care less if we all lived or died
they usually vote fo legistation that favors big business regardless of the impact on people,environment or the good of the people of America
The are against the new health care plan.
Always involved in my personal business.
Their actions are mean and spitefull.like a bunch of kids. Look at their actions in Congress---Stop eveything even the things everyone agrees upon.
It refuses to want to help ALL the people, only listens to Rich people
They only think of the rich people in our society and they make the income gap larger and larger
The other party does not believe that an individual is entitiled to keep what he or she earns. Rather, they believe that the government has a right to dictate what each person is entitled.
Many of the politicians believe they are above the law and do not have to have morals.
The other party is self-absorbed and Egocentric.
Obama, Pelosi, and Biden, and Palin to mention a few!
No party alone should be the controlling factor on any issue.
Too many tend to be single issue voters.
They want you to approve things that go against your believes. I don't see using my tax money for things I do not approve of; like abortion. '
it didn't bother them to throw away money and lives when "W" was in office.
they are interested in their own benefits & perks
I also do not like the idea of having single-sex marriage, which Democrats strongly seem to agree with.
Politicians of both parties are more interested in staying in power than doing what's best for the country.
They much rather let american industry fail.
I don't like the criticism of the other party members as long as they're divided and not working together nothing will be solved
not wanting to pay taxes to support the war it started
They are trying to kill the health care plan
Not listening to the will of the people.
They are devious, on the national level.
They ave no respect for what the voters want.
they can't agree amongst themselves on important matters
They are LIARS and are after their own agenda and have no concern for the working class. It's all about the rich. Lets try and help them get richer!!!!!!!!!!!!
Everything is black and white with no regard for people's needs.
Republicans are hypocrites. Democrats are liars.
this party is only interested in protecting the finances of the corporations and the rich
some are more concern about getting back in office,than they are about tring to solve some of the problems facing people
The other party has let the national deficite get TOTALLY out of control. Our country should not be in such debt, and also we should not be so reliant on outside countries for so many of our goods and manufacturing. We need to bring back our blue-collar jobs, as this country is becoming too vulnerable by being so dependent on other countries.
That they never want to work with Democrats no matter what the issue
They just keep giving money away without regard for the budget or where the money will come from. We used to set the standard for the world economy...no longer
Other party determined not to budge to co-operate with other party, and comment totally opposite from my party, and say untruths, like kill grandmothers, etc.
Already summed it up. Nothing else comes to mind.
Both parties have valid opinions. Maybe if they sat down and worked things through they'd see we all really just want the same things.
They are against all the moral values that I hold dear.
They are using all means necessary including bribes and backroom deals to change my country.
They are being led by incompetents live Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reed, and Barack Obama. They are set on pushing through a bill that will hurt all taxpaying, hard working Americans for their own gratification.
progressive - another work for socialists/marxists
They seem to be bickering too much among themselves.
The willingness to bend the constitution to permit torture, fatcats getting rich from government contracts, monopolies.
Wants to punish successful people by taking away the profits they gain from their hard work to pay for programs that benefit lazy freeloaders.
not everyone is some poor victim of circumstances.There really are bums, deadbeats, abusers of the system, charity, welfare,drug addicts etc. why should those who arent be forced to give to them more, and more, and more, amen
The general public does not know how the final medical bill in congress will affect our current medical coverage.
They don't believe in letting the state rule themselves like it says in the Constitution.
trying to please all, not having to work for what you get
I dislike every thing they do. I do not like a someone that thinks they are allways right.never admits they do make mistakes.
It can be hard sometimes, to determine differences from one political party to the next.
I dont like that they can make every choice to be a choice on Aborition.
ENVIROWACKOISM (THE GORE OHBUMMER FAITH) The new Democrat "TOOL TO ACHIEVE CONTRO;L AND POWER" OUR SCHOOLCHILDREN ARE NO LONGER GIVEN AN EDUCATION--they are being INDOCTRINATED with OUTRIGHT LIES DESTORTIONS AND TOTALLY BOUGUS PROPAGANDA- AL GORE HAS STOLEN THE PLACE OF WASHINGTON FRANKLIN- JEFFERSON- JACKSON- LINCOLN- EDISON- EINSTIEN & OTER GREAT AMERICANS-- ADOLF HITLER SAID IT IN THE LAST DEPRESSION-- "GIVE ME THE CHILDREN OF A NATION AND I WILL TAKE IT WITHOUT FIRING A SHOT!" HE HAD THE HELP OF JOS GERBELS- OHBUMMER HAS AL GORE!!!!
amount of money spent on campaigns for any party.
can't seem to come up with a good health plan.
I despise how the Democratic Party always sides with greater and greater control of government in our lives at the cost of individual freedoms and liberties.
The Democratic party thinks environmentalism is the new religion and is willing to sacrafice all to their new green god Al Gore.
The republicans care more about protecting what they have than helping other people. There is no reasonable explanation for continuing to allow insurance companies to discriminate for previous conditions, but that is not in the list of demands.
Would rather embarass the president than do whats right for the country
They feel the solution is to increase taxes.
i covered all that in the previous answer
they seem to run alot of propaganda rather than dealing with the issues
THEY MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO CHANGE THIER PART OR HELP WORKING CLASS PEOPLE
Gave banks money n still were not giving loans
They use Liz Cheney and Elizabeth from "The View" and Coulterto put forth their ideas--and they are not always willing to listen to other points of view
McCains run in 2008 was sloppy and underdone
without the criminals (convicted that is) there is no leadership
Looking to government to resolve problems that should be handled by individuals and the private sector.
they always make the simplest things more difficult
they dont seem to listen to others opion
they do not tell the truth aabout any of the bills, costs or taxes
The fact that there are only 2 important parties in this country.
They allow federal government dollars to be used for abortion.
DOES NOT PUT OUT COUNTRY FIRST, AND THE PRESIDENT APOLIGIZES FOR OUR COUNTRY, WHEREVER HE TRAVELS ABROAD/
The other party gives perks and tax benefits to the rich.
thinks citizens need to be cared for by govt
The wasteful spending and non productive time that is spent to get anything done
I don't like Michelle Obama. I don't understand how she needs more than 2 support staff.
That they consistently try to bring God and religion into the government--which is supposed to be separate.
They love to blame others for their inability to act, even though they are in power. They think most Americans are stupid and incapable of thinking for theirselves. They're not good money managers!
Their ties with the Church in making policies.
They act as though our tax money is theirs, to do with as they please.
Too much money involved to elect a person. There should be a limit.
they dont explain thereself what going on and different things
They are ignorant socialists who take my hard earned money and give it to freeloaders.
they dont care about our country. they just want to enrich themselves
don't think about others. false sense of freedom shit
for big government and "crutch like" assistance
Spend too much money and take funds from people that have earned through hard work and saved for the future!!!
They voted yes on the new health car bill.
i think they could have blocked the health bill if they had really lobbyed.
Their attitude against experimental treatments in medical science.
donot like how one try to make a bad name for the other!
backroom deals,lobbists and hidden adgendas that dont help hard working middle class americans.
they want to think about themself instead of the poor
The OTHER party believes that people should be able to stay on welfare and similar programs for an indefinite amount of time.
They want to take away our rights that were given to us in our Constitution. Try to take away our right to bear arms.
The only thing we are to the other party is someone to do things they don't want to do.You have to have money and lots of it to be in that party.
I dislike they can't think for themselves.
they're puppets from the builderberg group.
The attitude of their Politicans, not doing what the American people as a whole, [ meaning Majority want ]
They are in the midst of international discord.
they pollute and look like they all just screwed a pig.
The Republicans are too strongly tied to the religious right, who are even less willing to compromise than the rest of the GOP. Christians are not the only meaningful demographic in the US, and the US is *supposed* to have separation of church and state. Frankly, I find it repulsive that an unquestioning herd of small-minded, so-called "Christians" is attempting to impose a single, inflexible belief system onto the entirety of our diverse nation--they're a shame to their religion and their nation.
they are not gratefull for the good that our anceistors and founding fathers did to bring birth a new nation conceived under the god of the bible.
I dislike that they want to "even out" earnings regardless of job skills. I believe that some jobs carry more responsibility than others and require greater skill, and should therefore merit larger compensation.
Democrats seem to like to spend money. They want to spend money to take care of people that CAN work, but since they don't have to on the current welfare system, they don't. Democrats like to even make sure that illegal immigrants get medical care, even though they should not be here, which is ridiculous.
Not concerned about the middle claaa people.
I believe that they have all become career politicians and in doing so have made it their goal to further their career and earnings. Wouldn't you if it was your career?
I dislike the expansion of government in ever facet of life
think they can run my life better than me
not interested in the average person more for the big corporations
raise taxes on the working man and not the well of people.
Both the Democrats and Republicans (but especially the Democrats) are corrupt.
Willing to stop at nothing to insure their political agenda is put in place
They believe that by increasing the size of the government and by increasing the number of entitlements and by granting illegal immigrants amnesty that they can transform America into a socialist/Marxist utopia where they rule over us, the dependent serfs who know nothing.
don;t care ant thing for the illegal imagrants they dont see that they do most of the work here in the u.s terretory in this land and you don;t see that they work hard in the labor area and you dont see an actual american doing this type of job
Government control of things best left to chaitable organizaions
not a lot of compassion for the other party.
don't have a handle on what the majority of the public needs
I dislike that there are not many young people in the Republican party.
I dislike most organized parties because they perpetuate themselves as politicians and are not concerned with good policy.
I don't have a political party, I don't vote.
goverment spending in other countries when we are the ones in need.
I do not like the President name for one thaing and me is a moussalom
I think that they're just spending money freely.
THE CONCERN TO HELP THE RICH STAY RICH AND THE POOR STAY POOR.
I do not like when they make hostile remarks about the other party
I also do not like the fact that the other party is not looking out for what is in the better interest for our country.
They are to conservative to see beyond their own comfort and financial safety net.
Republicans are always for the wealthy. They do not care for the little man.
They run in lockstep they have no mind of there own if they did they were to they would be ostracized
they care mour abouth things than peple.
They let tomany alliens in;support them over the vets;other US citizens;give to much support to other countries.
they don't really care about people the only thing they care about is money
I don't like their stance on things like the economy or healthcare or the environment.
Individual freedoms are trumped by collectivism and political correctness.
They feel that the United States is a "bad" country. Obama's feeling that resinates to his fellow democrats.
Everyone in the U.S. government is greedy!
no one will do whats right without getting their plams greased
they support homosexual relations which are an abomination.
They help people that don't work and hurt the middle class
THEY ARE NOT WORKING ALONG WITH ALL PARTIES FOR THE GOOD OF ALL AMERICANS.WE NEED TO WORK FOR THE BETTERMENT OF THE COUNTRY REGARDLESS OF YOUR PARTY.
How many ways must I say that I have no interest in politics? Nobody has ever helped me with any of my struggles. Why should I care?
thy rase our taxs and taver the upper class tax

Please try once more to think of something that you dislike about the other party.
how they did the bail out. i really think they should have done it a diffrent way.
too many "lawyers" who seem to think that we want to be "protected".
They think they're better than everyone else.
I think you can find dislikes and likes from either party. Sometimes it is hard to like either.
During presidential state of the union address the shouting and defamatory comments
that they would even take part in the health care bill

Can you tell me which party has the most members in the United States Senate?
Not sure. It doesn't make a bit of difference.
I am not sure but I think it is the Republicans.
I believe that the Democrates have more members that actually turn out to vote sometimes, but it is probably the Republicans that have more registered.
Democrats at first but with the election of the MA senator, the split is even, that is if you count the two independents as Democrats which they ae closely aligned to.
The Democrats had controll but they lost a member so they can't filibuster the Reublicans but I thought I heard some Democrats don't like the medical plan that is on the table. I heard O'bama say he is going to try to get some Republicans on his side, but I think he doesn't have any choice but he makes it sound like he is trying to do the right thing.
now that Mass. is Republican, I believe the Republican Party
The Democratic Party has the most members in the U.S. Senate.
no estoy seguro pero creo que son los republicanos
Democrats have 59 members Republicans have 41 members
If I am not mistaken is the Democratic Party.
Currently, I believe it is required to have an equal amount of all parties.
I DO NOT CARE.WHY ISN'T THERE ANYTHING THERE ABOUT DISABLE VETS, OR THE ELDERLY, OR DISABLED PEOPLE. THESE PEOPLE DIDN'T GET THEIR TWENTY DOLLAR COST OF LIVING RAISE THIS YEAR.
I am unaware of which political party as the most members in the US senate.
It was the democrats. Not sure if it still is.
Unfortunately the Democrats but hopefully not for much longer.
Probably the Democratic Party, but we Independants are catching up.
it's even republicans and even democrats with 2 independent
Democrats but I think they are almost the same
Democrats. Thats our problem, they act like they're democrats but they are librals and progressives like some of the republicans.
Thought they were about equal but not sure.
I believe as of now it is the democrate party
Democrats if you include the two independents (Joe Leiberman etc)
Democrats, they have 57 comfirmed members. 2 Independants and 41 Republicans
i was thinking congress had to have equal members both sides
I believe that recently the republicans retook the majority senate.
democrats have majorities in both branches of congress
The democrat's control congress. senate is almost dem:52% rep;48%But not sure of senate actuall figures
The Democrats have the most members in the 111th United States Senate.
the democrats have more of their thugs in the senate
i think the democratic party does, since the current president is democratic,
The Democrat party. It is not the Democratic party. You need someone to spell check your surveys
I,Willie feel that the Decormacy has the most.
Iam not sure but I think it is the republicans.

Can you tell me who is the current Speaker of the House of Representatives?
The speaker of the house is Hillary Clinton
Nancy P from California....I hope she loses her job or at least the Speakership
don't know I believe it is a woman but I don't recall her name
Nancy Pelosi is the current Speaker of the House.
the lady with the strong catholic upbring who supports abortion in a can.Pelosi
Dick Cheney may have previously been a speaker for the house of representatives.
Yes that liberal from California, Polosi.
Was listening to cnn tonight and heard but don't remember the name
Nacy Pelosi. I think they should get her out.
no-- I think it may be that dip Nancy pelosi
Female democrat with an Italian sounding name
She is a female but can't remenber her nane
i think it is a lady but do not know her name. cg.
Nancy Polosey I don;t know how to spell her last name.
Dim-Wit, Bo-Toxed, crap-for-brains Pol-o-sick . . .
no, I do know it used to be Tipp O'neal. Not sure now, don't keep up with it like I did when I was in school (which was well over 20 years ago)

Please list a fact about Policy 1:
Get $400 a month, $50 for each additional child, benefits for 3 years , then $500 in food stamps, and after 1 year work 20 hrs. a week.
policy 1gives a limit to benifits without totally cutting it of but makes you earn the benifits
Gives more dollars to the families with children (dependents)
400 per month with $50 per child and 200 per year in food stamps.
$1000 per month plus for family with one child, additional $200 for extra children, $2000 a year in food stampls, extra subsidies for housing and day care
$1000.00 and seven years with $200.00 for each child and you don't have to work for it.
Recepients would receive $1000 per month for family with one child for 7 years
It will for sure cost me a taxpayer more money and it is not truly helping the way a good solid job would.
$1,000 per month for a family with one child, and an additional $500 for each additional child
To pay lazy, don't want to work people 1,000.00 dollars for one child, 200.00 for the next.
$400 month for family, extra $50/month for each child
good for seven years...four thousand a year for one child and 200 for each additional child
Gives money away with no incentive to go to work
Republican and more money given away for longer period of time
I feel no one should get money they should go out and get a job
Requires recipients to work 20 hours a week after 1 year
after some time you have to work 20 hrs a week
Lots of money up front for social welfare
500/mo with one child addl $50 for other child last one year
thot they will have to go to work after 2 years
$1000 a month for the first child and $200 for each additional child for up to 7 years with food stamps, housing and daycare allowance.
$500 a month per child, $50 each additional child
$1000 per month to families with children
tax money for kids with more for more kids, later have to work 20 hrs WHICH sounds more like a Republican plan than a democrat one
they get a pretty decent stipend from the feds
Give them $200 a year with $100 per child for 7 years, then give an additional $2000.
Families would be given $300 dollars a month plus an additional $50 for each additional child.
people would be required to work for their benefits after awhile.
1000 dollars a month for families with one child
Benefits for families of one child would be 500 dollars and the benefits would last 3 years
Recipients receive $50 for each additional child.
some amount of money for a person with 1 child and food stamps also
The amount per family is lesser as well as the timeframe.
Requires 20 hours of work after a period of time.
$1000 dollars/month for families w/ 1 kid
People would be given a free ride for 5 years
would have to work 20 hours after a time
Republicans would give $1000/month and Democrats $400. There were other details...I tend not to pay a lot of attention if I do not know how things will be paid for.
Recipients with one child receive $400 a year
$1000 a month to a family with one child
$400 a month for a family with 1 child, $50 each for rest of their chldren. $500/yr for food stamps - required to work 20 hrs a week after one year receiving benefits
Frankkly I don't believe that my Republican representatives would hand out that quantity of money at this time.
$1000. per month, 7 years, up to $2000 per for addition food money, no strings attached.
give $400 a month to families with one child
$1,000 a month for families with 1 child and $200 for each additional child. Some extra benefits plus food stamps. forgot the term, i think 7 years,
Stipends of up to $1000 for needy families; would last for 5 years.
2,000 dollars per year in food stamps per family.
20 hours of work required at the end of 1 year.
that they shoud get 1200.00for doing nothing
you would get 1000.00 tax creidt for 1 child
$400. would be given to a family with 4 dep. and $50 each addition dependent
It's less expensive and requires people to work for their money
It is essential to keep us as a Republic.
400 a month for 1 child and 50 extra for each additional plus food stamps. 3 (?) year limit, then and part time job after 2 (?) years.
It would give $400 to a family with one child and additional funds to support that family.
Giving too much FREE shit for too long to the lazy
The party had to go to work after a certain time period and did not get as many benefits as in other plan. TO GET BY , THE PERSON WOULD PROBABLY HAVE HAD TO FIND SOME WORK.
400 per mo. for family of w/1 child. increasing At 50$ per extra child for w/ food stamps
It gives families with one child 1,000 dollars and I believe 200 dollars extra per child. It also gives them too many food stamps. This lasts for 7 yrs.
More money for the family with one child, longer terms
$400/month per family with 1 child; 200 for each additional child; work 20 hrs
Money becasue you have kids...How about creating JOBs instead
$1000 a month for a family with one child
$1000 per month given to recipients with families of one child, with an additional $200 dollars for each additional child.
1000 dollars a month a child and 250 for each additional child.
there was no provision for going to work after the seven years
$1000 a month for welfare recipients and $2000 year in food stamps
Is this a grade school test ? I know what I read.
After a year, the head of household will be required to work 20 hours/week to continue receiving benefits.
This policy would not be acceptable in my opinion - too liberal for consideration by me
Families with 1 child would be given $400 a month with an additional $200 per child.
$500 subsidy for 1st child; $50 each child after
Families with 1 child get 1000 dollars per month with 200 more for each aditional child
500.00 monthly for food stamps for a family with one child
receive subsidies for children and food stamps but need to work for 20 hours a week
payments decrease with increasing family size
The mornig kids you have the more money you get
last 5 yrs - have to work 20 hrs. wk after so many yrs.
$50 each for each additional child.Max 3 years on program.
Recipients would have to work 20 hours a week starting one year after starting benefits.
You WANT TO GIVE our money to the welfare people for 3 years
There would be 400.00 a month for each family
my computer was acting up at the time & I had to shut down, so I forget the facts
Families with one child will receive a base pay of $1000 per month.
After one year the recipient would be required to work 20 hours per week.
$400 a month stipend with limited time of dependency before requiring work program of at least 20 hours per week
smaller amunt of money given and a requiremen of 20 hours of work ater 1 year which I like
Welfare, Heath Care Public Housing Day Care
it was about welfare and food stamps,and mooney to help people live on
1000 dollars a month for two children. Expected to last two years. 2000 dollars worth of food stamps a year
they would be given 1000 a month.200 fora child an d be ok for up to 7 years
Supported by 90% of R, but only 10% of D. $1000 a year for families with 1 child, with an additional $200 per kid after. Good for 7 years. Also allows $2000 a year in food stamps.
After 1 year the people would have to work 20 hours per week.
Give $xxx to parents of a child. Require them to work for 20 hours a week for the next year.
$200/month for one child $50/month for each additional child plus food stamps, after a year the recipient is required to work at least 20 hours a week
Familie with one child would get $400 a month.
GIVING MONEY TO PEOPLE WHO ARE TO LAZY TO GET A JOB
I think the policy wanted to give people $500 a month for 3 years $400 a month in food stamps with a extra 50 for each child after 2. Plus they had to work 20 hrs. after so long.
1000 for first child 100 for all other 2000 a year food stamp and help with houseing and child care
A family receives $400.00 a month for 3 years and an additional $50.00 per child.
After a period of time, requires recipients to perform 20 hrs/week of work. Provides less funds than Policy 2, shorter period of time, lower food stamp benefits, etc.
Give a family 1,000 dollars per year for one child; 200 dollars for each addn. child
FAMILIES WILL RECIEVE $1,000.00 PER MONTH FOR 1 CHILD.
Families would get $1000.00 per month for up to 7 years, plus additional food stamps.
It gives money to people for doing nothing and it gives them even more if they reproduce. It is disgusting.
$50 for each child and each additional child.
$2000 a month would be given to a welfare family with one child
last 7 years, $1000.00 month with extra $200.00 per child over one child.
It would give poor recipients $200 per year per child, it would give them an additional $2000 per year in food stamps.
give $1000, 200 per child, $2000 etra food stamps, housing & insurance
giving $1000 a year per child with an additional $2000 for living expenses.
$1,000 to be given for the first child and $200 for each additional child.
last 3 years and pays 400 per child with addition 50 a child and requires 20 hours of work
$500 a month. $50 for each additional child
1000.00 a month plus housing plus food stamps no work at all.
Recipients have to work 20 hours a week after one year in program
Giving away too much money. Find these people jobs.
people need to work, help them but make them work.
$400 dollars a month for families with one child, giving $50 extra per additional child and up to $500 on foodstamps.
give 1000.00per family whith one child and 200 for any other child
$1000 a month + $200 for each add. child for 7 years
they were to receive 400 a month plus 50.00 for each child. and 1000. a yr in food stamps for 7 yrs then they would have to work 20 hours a week
200 for each child up to a certain amount 50 for the rest of the kids for a period of time
3 yr policy with $500/mo going to the parent of one child. Must work 20hrs/wk after one year.
given 400$ for family with one child and 50 each child after that for 3 years
Additional $2,000 for certain expenses per year
Those qualified with lots of kids would get a lot of money over a long period of time, like 7 years.
Will give $2,000 a year to families with 1 child.
lower monies, lower food, lower added benefits
Spending all of MY retirement on lazy baby factorys
You get only so much money for only so long if you are out of work. You better find a job to keep getting that money and it has to be at least part time.
Giving taxpayer dollars for more children
que dan meno dinero y cupones de comidas
family with a child will receive $1000 towards that child and $250 for each addition child
Provides an additional $50 per extra child
only last 3 years, have to work 20 hrs a week
1000 dollars a month for a family with one child
400 a month and then 50 for each additional child for 3 years and then must work 20 hours
Democrats idea(s) about the healthcare reforms and aspects they have planned if passed.
$400 month for 3 years eventually go to work
500 a month, food stamps and lasts 3 years.
Another entitlement program that we can't afford
500 a mouth after a year they work at least 20 hrs a week good for 3yrs
A thousand a month for a family with one child
1000.00 per month and 200 additional children plus food stamps
It is MUCH more costly to us (the U.S.) because the pay out was very high.
It requires 20hours of work after a period of receiving benefits to continue those benefits
1000 dollars a month, 2000 dollars a year in food stamps, housing subsities. 100 dollars for each additional child
It is an entitlement to those who do not want to work. It provides money for indiduals, additional funding for food stamps and further subsidies on top of those with no accoutability of the individuals receiving aid.
Thousands of dollars given to familys, more money if they have more childern, the programs lasts for seven years
requires 20 hours of work per week eventually
Wants $400 entitlement for family with child.
$400/mo plus $50 per child over 1 child. Lasts 5 years. $500/year food stamps. After 1 year must work 20 hours/week
$1000 given to each family plus food stamps.
1000$for first child and 200 for each child after, $2000 per year in food stamps for 7 years
$500 for 1st child, $50 for additional kids
$400 to families of one child, $50 for each additional child.
giving family w/1 kid $200:mo & foodstamps
Handouts are excessive & without control and will end up in drink or drugs
After 1 year recipients would be required to work 20 hours.
$1000 for families with one child and $200 for ea additional child.
Families with a single child may receive $1,000 a year.
It only offered money and nothing about a job.
ENOUGH MONEY FOR A FAMILY WITH ADDITIONAL FOR EACH CHILD AFTER THAT PERHAPS 50 DOLLARS
$1000/month; $400 each additional child; 7 years
????1,000 per month plus $200 for?? Additional $2,000 for food stamps etc. I was so discusted that I may not be accurate...
Give money shorter time and less at a time.
Pay $500 a month for one child and $50 apiece for each additional child
Putting them to work for twent hours a week.
$500/yr for food stamps, then after a year we require the recipient to work at least 20 hrs per wk
lower income families will receive $400 per month plus $50 per child and money towards food stamps
provide $1000, for each child and 450 after each additional child
Give benefis for a longer time and not require any work.
It is very socialistic and the government pays you for doing nothing but having children
#1 is close to what we have and we have people now that don't want a job as they are working the system and getting by!!
1000 a month for first child, 200 a month for each additional child, subsidies for 7 years
giving initial $500 plus $50 for each child (after first).
Housing subsidies and childcare to people.
1000 for first child, 200 per each addiional child 1000 in food stamps. Lasts for 7 years.
There is money given to families to have lots of children.
give wefare 200 amonth plus 50 for each addinal child for 5 years
$1000 with 1 child and $200 each additonal child
$400 a month for a family with one child.
must work 20 hours a week after 1 year of benefits
this policy offers a subsidy of $500 for the first child and $50 for each additional child with an additional subsidy for health expenses
It will increase the national debt more than Policy 2.
It was supported by only 10% of the Republican Party.
too much money and no responsiblity on the recipate
after a year, they have to work for at least 20 hours a week
$400 per month with 1 child, plus $50 for each additional child.
$500 for first child, $50 for every other, for one year.
payments with bonus of food stamps but requirement to work 20 hours/week
One gets a thousand dollars for first baby and 200 for subsequent ones.
$1000 for one child, $200 for the others, 7 years
gives alot - extends benefits - does not ask the receipent to earn any portion ... encourages receipent to have more children
Paid for seven years without any work requirement
on health, working for the American Family
A $1,000 a month for a family w/ 1 child and housing.
2000 in food stamps a year 1000 dollars a mont for 5 yrs
each family would receive $2000 per one child, $100 for each additional child.
They want to give away less money to the welfare recipients,less time and less food stamps.
Give 1000 dollars for each child, lasts 7 years, give food stamps and additional funds
It is $500 per month for three years with an option of $500 per year after that.
20 hours of work a week $400 for first child and $50 for others per month
I am opposed to any aid given to people who keep producing illegimate children-we have many people who keep doing so to get money.
$1000 per month for a family with one child.
Family receives $1000/month for a single child.
Would give 400 dollars to a family with one child and would last less years than policy #2
it stinks because it will be abused by all, democrat or republican as well as lobbyist at both the state and federal levels and be nothing more than a over flowing toilet to be paid for at the tax payers espense, but, one or the other doesnt matter, innocent children are involved and need our help. I suggest we pass both and turn it over to Acorn for honesty and integrity in its distribution.
people with kids get free money and food
they are giving more to raise children on
90% republican supported 10% democrat opposed
It promotes illigetimate and unwed mothers @ the rate of $1000.00 a month.
The recip. of the benefits would work 20 Hours.
2000 a month plus 500 per child for 7 years for welfare.
$400 a month for family with one child. $50 for each additional child. Plus up to $500 in food stamps.
POLICY ONE WOULD GIVE $1,000 A MONTH TO A FAMILY WITH ONE CHILD.
to give money to people that won't work I worked and took care of my family without hands out,every one else should do the same.
400 a month for 1st child 50 for additional child
One family with one child may receive $1,000 dollars welfare.
1000 per mont with one child. 1000 per year additional for food stamps. 7 year period
NEITHER POLICY HELPS BUILD JOBS OR HELP OUR ECONOMY.
republicans are giveing more money to the people
taxpayer-funded money to families of children
I don't think they should give so much away to the welfare system. I think help where needed, there are to many riding the system and on drugs I whole heartdly believe they should take a drug test and that they should be out working some where trying to help out their selves
$1000.00 a month for family with one child and benefit is for 7 years
I thought 7 years was too long for someone to depend on the government for support.
1000 dollars a month for 7 years 2000 in food stamps a year
400 a month for a family with one child plus 50 for additional child, 500 a year in food stamps , last 3 years , work 20 hours
$1000 a month for a family with one child plus $200 for each extra child plus $2000 a year of food stamps for seven years
when finished, you have to work 20 hours a week
It will result in alterations of freedoms.
People have to work 20 hours a week after a certain amount of time in order to keep there income from the state
1000 a month 299=== 200 per e3xtra EACH CHILD
$1,000 a month with household with 1 child
500a month for one child and 50 amonth for additional children.
democrat 90% for. $400 first child $50 each child after. after first year required to work 20 hours per week
200 $ food stamps and 50.00 per child plus 400 a month for one child
upped food stamps to 2000 per year for families
Lasts for 20 years, giving 1000 dollars to families with one child and $200 additional for each next child
The policy lasts for a period of 7 years
1000/ month + more for additional children. 2000 in food stamps for 7 years
1000. dollars amonth-plus food stamps--am not sure how much per child
$400 per family with one child...with an additional $50.00 per child. Max. time to receive benefits would be three years....after one year reciepant must work 20 hours per week. additional max benefit of $500 in food stamps per year
1200 per month on first child plus daycare
More money per month, and lasts for 7 years, No work requirement listed
Give "poor people" $2000. Give $1000 for first child. Give $500 for second etc. children. Give Food Stamps to recipient.
$400 per family with one child, plus $50 for each child. Will last 3 years. Required to work 20 hours/week after the first year.
$1,000 to a family with one child, with an additional $500 per additional child, in the form of food stamps.
Democrats want to give smaller 'gifts' to the needy than the Republicans
These freeloaders should be put to work immediately before they can collect any benefits immediately.
1000 per family with one child 500 for each othefor 7 years 2000in food stamps and money for expenses
There was not enough information given Policy 1 gave 1000 a month plus additional costs.
$400/month + $50/month for each child. $500/yr food stamps. There is some time component to the benefit and after a period of time, you must work a min of 20 hours per week
Each family with 1 child in the household will receive $1000 per month for 7 years.
Give some money to households for three years. They have to work some .
$400.00 a month for the first child and $50.00 a month for each additional children for 5 years plus food stamps
$1000 a month for families with one child.
It gives the person: $1000 a month plus $200 per child
benefits for 3 years and then have to work 20 hours per week
90% of democrats support giving a credit to families with one child over a 1 year period.
Another social program to hand out money, so the liberals can feel good about themselves, this country was built on hard labor not handouts.
Gave 100 a month per family 50$ extra per extra child ,extras for food stamps lasts 3 yrs
$400. a month an additional $50. per child for 3 yrs.
1000.00 for the famlies with one child. 200.00 for each additional child.
500 a month with 50 dollars for each dep and decreasing benifits and 20 hrs work a week to keeep that up to three years
policy 1 wanted to give more money and food stamps and raise the debt.
$400 a week + $50 for each addition child
After a year, people must work 20 hours a week
democrats are in favor of cutting down monies after a few years of families on welfare.
I think people should get help when they need it. But don't like to see people take advantage of the goverment and not try to work if at all possible. Jobs are a big issue now. Policy 1 would eat up a lot of money if misused.
400 dolloars to families with a child and an additional 50 per other children
Will provide $400 a month for families with 1 children and additional $50 for the next child. Will also be eligible for food stamps
too much money for people not willing to work
$1,000 would be given to a family with one child...
Family with one child would receive $1000/month;
giving money and food stamps for 1 year free of charge and 20 hours of commmunity service in subsequent years.
give 400.00 for 1 child and 50.00 additional, 500.00 extra in food stamps,after 1 year have too work 20 hours a week
$400 to family with one child.$50 for each additional child. foodstamps , housing subsidies
Thousand dollars a month with options for more money. This will last for 7 years, without having to work or pay back!
$500 a month for a family with 1 child, $50 for each additional child.
400 A MONTH GIVEN TO A FAMILY WITH 1 CHILD
Giving free money to people. But they have to work.
It gave alot more money per household than #2. It didn't require them to work at all, and that is important , I think.
Welfare recipients with one child would receive $1000/month.
Republican Policy to give $1000 extra child credit with additional years to be $500. Also will give the most in food stamps. All of this for a longer period of time (5 years)
1000 a month for family with one child and 200 for each child after that with options of 2000 a year in food stamps that will last up to 7 years
After 2 years would have to work 20 hours a week
$400. a moth for family with one child , last 2 years ,and then family is to get a job that works 20 hours a week
They are offering $1,000 a month for a famiy of l child to start.
1000 dollars are given to a family with one child and an extra 500 for every other child
Pay out $100 to one child families and $50 for subsequent children
Families w/ one child would receive $1000 a month
policy say family get $4oo dallor a month and extra chid get$50 and food afer 3 yr the recipt have to work 20 hour
$1000 for families with one child, plus additional for two, etc.
They want to give ridiculous amounts of my money to freeloaders. Must be a plan by democrats...
less money , required to work 20 hours after 2 or 3 years.
Does not require the person receiving the support to work.
1000 per family of one child additional 200 for each individual children
$1000 a month plus for each additional child $200 a month with $2,000 in food stamps for the year.
offering welfare recepients $1000 each month and $200 for each additional child
$1000 dollars a month for familes and $2000 dollars a year for food stamps and other aid if needed for housing and clothing
after 1 year people are required to work at least 20 hours a week
There is initial benefit of $1000 per family with one child.
$400 a month for one child and $50 a month for each additional child.
too much money {1000.] AND then more for food and child care.
it was giving less money. It didn't have extra for housing or transportation. $700. lasted for 3 years.
$1000 for first child then 200 for each each lasting for 7 yrs
It provides $1,000 a year to a welfare family with one child.
"This is a majority of an issue depending on children's medical or whatever services they get somewhat but it has the lowest cost".
1000 amonth for family w 1 child, 200 add for each child
Republicans wanting to give out more over longer period of time than democrats
$1000 per month for families with 1 child
after 1 year of benefits, it is required that the person must work a 20 hour week.
repulicans want to give $2000 dollars per year and goverment assisitent
Gives $1000 per month to a one-child family
$500 in food stamp subsidies for 5 years.
Recipients would be required to work 20 hours after one year.
have to go back to work 20 hours a week after year 1
wanted to give 1000 a month to family with at least 1 child,up to 2000 a yearin food stamps,for 7 years.
Their trying to get help people get affordable housing.
to help people by giving them money but only for a year after thet they will be required to get a part time job
90% Democrat and 10% Republicans support, $500 month per family plus $50 pre child. $1,000 food stamps. Time limit on benefits. Evidence of some work required.
The recipients will receive $400 a month for 1 child for 3 years.
1000 for 1 child and 100 each additional for seven yrs
payment for a couple of years with no work invilved
there is postive ideas to get our ouR economy moving in apostive way without bankrupting us.
i read about the republcanes and democrates were trying to do thigs diffent to inprove in stamps and how u can get money fo each child!
eligible for additional $2000 in food stamps each year
Had a work requirement after 1 year of receiving taxpayer money.
Good for three years and they have to work
$1,000 a month with $200 extra per child
$400 a month for a one child family. $50 additional per child. Three year benefits. $500 a year in foodstamps. Must work 20 hours a week to earn additional benefits. Supported by 90% of Democrats.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
$1000 per child, $200 more for each additional child
would require to work 20hours per week after 1 year.
Pays $1000 for a family with 1 child (7-year program). $200 per additional child and $2000 a year food coupons
Putting it short, when the people get money they have to put 20 hrs of work in to get it, which is good.
1000 per child for 7 years. Additional $200 for something.
The recipient program last for seven years
each recipient would have to work 20 hrs per week
had to work 20 hr 500.00 a one child family for 3 yrs don't remeber the stamps
The democratic wanted to give welfare benefits of 500 a month to people with 1 child and 200 dollars a month for each additional child. Foodstamps up to 700 for 3 years.
Republican,$1000. a month for welfare.$100. EXTRA FOR KIDS
400.00 for two years for the first child an 50.00 for each additional an must do community service for a certain period time.
Give free money to encourage people not to work and to encourage bad behavior and destroy families
After one year the person would have to work 20 hours a week to receive money.
Work 20 hrs a week after one year of benefits
Give 1,000 a month to families with children.
it allows $400.00 dollars a month for welfare.
$400 for each child and $50 for each additional
Would give benefits of $400 per month for families with a child, $50 more per each additional child.
a HAND OUT OF MONEY AND FOOD STAMPS FOR FAMILIES.W/ CHILDREN FOR SEVEN YEARS
required t0 work after 1 year of benefits
$1000 per month for families with one child
would get 500 a year for food stamps and would have to work 20 hrs. after that year
Get something for nothing, way too much welfare
20 hours of work would be required for benefits
helps only people with children; what about the rest of us who are struggling with even older children?
Policy No 1 would pay benefits for 7 years
400 per child with extra 50. Food stamps about 1000.
300 dollars for a family with one child. additional funds for food stampes for addional children. requires work after a grace peroid continue to receive benefits.
A payment of $1000 a month for a family with 1 child, and $200 for each additional child
&1000 for each houshold with 200 for each child
$400 a month for family with 1 child with $50 for each add'l child
lower in inial pay out. but did not encurage finding work.
Favored by the Democrats giving people too much money without working for it.
people would get benefits and would have to work
After a year they would be required to work at least 20 hrs.
$400 per family with one child, $50 for add't children per year. Must work 20 hours next yr.
Policy 1 gives too much money to the families such as $2000.00 on food a year and housing and daycare allowances.
distributes $1000 per month for families with one child, and an additional $200 per month for each additional child.
They are planning on giving 1000/month for 7 years for a family with 1 child
After 1 year of benefits the recipient would be required to work at least 20 hours per week.
IT LASTED FOR 7 YEARS ALLOTATED $1000 MONTH W/500 FOR EACH ADDITOINAL CHILD $2000 FOR FOOD
500/mo + 50 for each additional child 4 years
Will be for 7 years, subsidized housing, $1000.00 per month w/1child and an added$200 for additional children
one year entitlement program that require 20 hours per week work afterwards
500 dollars in food stamps goes to a family w/no income
u would get extra food stamps for a year
gave to much damn money to people with children
90% democrat 10% republic 500 month 50 per child extra 500 food stamps
democrats want to give 400 dollars and fifty for each child
that policy 1 is for helping people who really needs it.
Recipients had 20 hours/week work requirement after reciving benefits for a while.
Either one is just one more handout. We had a 200 Billion dollar deficet last month are you aware of that???>
it h additional childhhhwould give families with children $500 credit for 1 and $50 for eac
gives too much to baby factories and lasts 7 years
3 years in duration til having to work 20 hrs/week; $400 w/1 child & $50/child thereafter; $500 add'l in food stamps
GIVING money to people who want hand outs
Recipients would be required to work fro 20 hours
1000 per month for a child..200 for each additional child
More Democrats were in favor of it than Republicans.
makes a party get a job after 2 years at least 20hrs a week
someone will be receiving an awful amount of the tax-payers money.$400.a month,plus $50.plus stamps.
they wantto give only 400 for one child and 50 for each other additional child
400per month 50per child 3yrs 500 food stamps
1000 a month for one child and 200 after that for 7 years
after one year they would be required to find a job
four hundred dollars per month for family of four.
$400 would be given to a family with one child.
$400 a month for a fimly plus $50 per month for kids for 2 years
Wasn't paying that much attention. Don't really care about politics.
2,000 dollars first year plu 200 per other children for seven years
400 per month for a family with 1 child for 2 years.
A person would have to begin working 20 hours per week after the first year.
$1,000 a month 7 years additional money for food stamps
You get $400.00 plus $50.00 for each additionl child, up to 2 years then have to work..(Where are these jobs coming from)??????
$400. for one child & $50.00 for each after I thilnk it lasted 3 years
$2000.00 for one child $50. per each other child
$400 per month for the first child, run for 3 years, after first year must work 20 hrs. per week.
500 a month for one child and 50 a month for each additional child for 1 year
1000 DOLLARS GIVEN TO ONE WITH ONE CHILD AND 200 DOLLARS FOR EACH ADDITION
$50.00 per month for each child of an unemploy parent
500/mo/for 1 child, +50/child >1, last 2 years, 500/yr in stamps
A family would receive $400 a month plus $50 per child. Additional funds available for food stamps.
$1000 dollars to a family of one child with $200 for each additional child
It was supported by 90% Democrats and 10% Republicans
The parents would have to start working at least 20 hours after a certain amount of years.
It would give $1000 per month to a family with one child.
good for 1 year then must work 20 hours a week
democrats are not by partasine ther idea is voting with them
$400/mo for 3years and after that they have to work 20 hours a week and $1000/yr in food stamps
something about 2000.00 increase a yr for foodstamps family with 2 kids
These people would receive $400 a month with one child.
they would have to work 20 hours per week
receive $400 in benefits per child & $50 addl child for 3 years. $500 month food stamps and for 1 year then work 20 hours/week
Giving so much to the families will take from our SSI,as you know is about broke;we haven't been given as raise for 3 years now;may ever at this rate.The senators after 1 yr in office,retire;get full pay for them selfs;family,as do the congresman.Go figure that one.
400 a month per family with a least one child
$400 dollars a month $50 for each additional child last two yrs and they work 20hr a week
$1,000 per month for the first child, 200 additional per additional child per month. Lasts up to 7 years. $2,000 per year for food stamps
after one year recipient must work 20 hours a week
will start by giving families 1000 for a family for one child
people with one child get $2000 a year for 7 years
The children would get $1,000 for the first child a year.
receipiants would receive $400 per month
$500/mo for 1st child, with $50 per additional child, after 1st year work 20 hrs/wk
recipients would get $50 for each additional child/month
1,000 dollars a month for families with one child, with an additional 2000 a year in food stamps; all for 7 years.
Too much money being offered for welfare.
It offers $1,000.00 per month for a family with one child.
1,000 dollar stipend for 1st child and 200 there after
The benefits would/could last up to 7 years.
$2000 per month given to a single child family.
they want to give people everything that are too sorry to work for a living
2 years of benefits of $400 dollars per month with additional $50 per additional child
it gives a lotta benefits without sweat hours
give a family 1000.00 for 1 child and 200.00 for each child
People receiving the benefits would be required to work 20 hours per week.
2000 foodstamp could last a alitte while
it offered less benefits than the second policy for shorter periods of time.
family of one gets $400 and $50 for each additional child.
1000 a year for 1 child and 200 each additional..increase in foodstamps and they dont have to work at all
$1,000 - 1 kid . . . 7 years . . . $400 additional other kids
Proposes to give families with one child $400 month.
I BELEIVE THEY SHOULD WORK CHARITABLE PLACES TO EARN WHAT THEY GET...
get money for 1 yr. and then must work for 20 hr a week
$200 for the first child. $50 for each additional one.
400 monthly must get a job working 20 hours 50 a child extra
househole 1000 a monht 200 a chid 2000.00 a year walface program

Please list another fact about Policy 1:
the benifits are adjusted according to the number of people in the family
$400 a month for family with one child, $50 for each extra kids, $500 in food stamps. three year plan, must work 20 hours after year 1 to continue receiving
They would receiver another 200 per month for additional child
It will teach the people to once again just depend on the government.
$1,000 per month for the first kid, $200 for each additional kid
$1000 per month with no return is crazy and the added $200 per child would encourage people to have kids just for a welfare check. Not unlike now.
Must work 20 hours after a certain number of years
High payout with higher for extra children with no requirement to work WHICH is more like a democrat plan than a Republican one
They would also receive $1000 in food stamps each month.
The benefits would be given to the family for 3 years.
two hundred a month for each additional child
recipients would have to work after 1 year
They have a program similar to the Welfare to Work program
Moves from money to food stamps with work on behalf of the recipient.
No where is it mentioned that people will have to work to earn this money
$50 a month is given to the recipient for each additional child
answered all I remember on the previous page
It is a huge give away program and I would not support it at all!!!
give $50 for each child after the first one
Shorter term of welfare [If I remember correctly].
$1,000 benefit and $400 for each additional dependent
Very expensive and lasts too long. No incentive for people to get off it.
Freebies last too long. These people are expecting free handouts and a FREE Ride because of who they are
$1000. per month plus $200 mlore for any child after 1. They would also receive food stamps. There was no incewntive to get off wellfare just to keep having kids.
after a year the family must work 20hrs per week to get the benefits
less money to give to the family with one child, short term
supported by 90% of the democrats and 10% of the republicans
1000 a month plus 200 for each additional child
Families will receive $400 for the first child.
There is no reason for any payments to be made in this case other than severe need, which Policy 1 does not contain
After a certain amount of time, the recipients will be required to work a minimum of 20 hours per week.
after one year they would have to work at least 20 hours a week
After 1 year participants must work 20 hours per week.
Recipients would recieve $200 a week base.
An additional $200 per month would be granted for each additional child.
The amount allowed for each child after one would be $50/month.
they get 2000 olus so much for each child
500 dollars a month per child. less money for food stamps
2000 over a year in increse to food stamps
Supported by 90% of Democrats and 10% of Republicans
Would get $50 for each child after the first child.
$1000 A MONTH FOR UNDETERMINED AMOUNT OF TIME
They can collect food stamps in the amount of $500.00 per month.
The want to provide Public Assistance of $500 per month
FAMILIES WILL RECIEVE HELP WITH CHILDCARE.
it will provide more assistance to the recipitant
There would be extra money for additional children.
It said people had to work 20 hours a week to keep getting benefits
$1000/ month on benefits for people with 1 child
It would give a poor recipient $1000 per year
additional allowance for housing and food stamps
$1,000 in food stamps to be given to each family.
Participants get $500 per month for first child
Still too much money. We shouldn't become so dependent on our government.
they would receive 1000.00 a month and 200. for each child
an amount for food stamps for a period of time
A family with only one child would receive a certain amount of money for the 7 year period.
Will provide $200 a week for living expenses.
the money is $1000 per month for a family with one child
90% demoncrats believe this should happen.
family will receive 1000 for foodstamps per year
after the first year, must work 20 hrs/wk
I just listed everything I could remember
Low benefits in terms of monthly stripend and food stamps.
After 2 years they are required to work 20 hours per week.
Extra money for housing income and child care.
500.00 per month plus 200.00 per child for 3 years. work 20 hr per week plus food stamps
I really didn't pay that much attn. to the amounts involved. Sorry!
It provides for financial support for a family with children
It provided additional funds for each child a person had.
no explanation for where the funds come from
Individual would have to work 20 hours after first year.
giving $50 more per month for additional kid
Recipients receive 400 per month and 50 for each additional child.
Families are not required to work in order to receive this money.
Have babies and get money sitting at home.
Provide an additional $200 a month for additional children.
Make the payment for 3 years then you would be required to work to receive any benefits
They want to only give them welfare for a year.
help onday care - 2000.00 deductions on taxes
Would have to work 20 hours a week after the first year
$50 extra per month for each additional child
$400 for each child, 50 for additional child and limited time
Too much money for each additional child.
The money for each children is more than for policy 2
They would also get a large amount of food stamps benefits.
gives a family $1000 for the first child and 250 for each other child
There is a time-limit on how long they can receive money.
$50 each additional child. $200/year food stamps. 3 years of benefits, must work 20 hours a week after first year.
this policy offers a minimal amount for foodstamps
It will increase federal entitlements more than Policy 2.
Welfare recipiants would receive smaller benefits for up to aprox. 2 years.
calls for some responsibility on the recipiate
able to receive $500 a year in food stamps
This "free ride" would last for 3 years.
Families with children can get 2thousand in food stamps
lesser benefits - require receipent to earn their benefits
They would get a one time deposit of $1000
They expect them to work 20 hours a week.
Give 500 for child and 50 for ech additional. Lasts for 3 years
You have to work for 20 hours a week after that.
$400 per month for child and $50 for additional
It, along with policy 2, rewards the problem I just stated. It has been proven that women live together and take turns having children to get the money and one sits home and babysits while others go out, party, make more babies.This is only one thing that is happening
$200 per month for each additional child.
After a certain time period,The recipient would be required to work 20 hours a week.
20 hours of work per week required after 1 year
In all sincerity, we all owe our most generous efforts to the welfare of the children of all walks of life, it is a pity that so many hundred of millions of dollars is stolen buy those who profess to help them.
people with kids get free money and food
after one year recipients mus work 20 hours per week.
POLICY ONE WOULD ALSO 2,000 A YEAR IN FOOD STAMPS.
it is still hands outs to people that will not take care of their own family. The know if they don't do it ,the goverment will take care of then,that is the problem right now,there has been too many handouts.It is time to say go to work, or go hungry,
Welfare recipient may benefit for seven years.
ENDLESS WELFARE PROGRAMS AND BUREAUCRAT JOBS NEVER END. JUST THE DREAMS OF THE WORKING TAXPAYER WHE ENDS UP DYING OFF EARLY FORM OUTRAGE AND STRESS.
democrats are giveing less money to the people
Work twenty hours per week after one year.
too much $ food stamps , dont have to work
giving away to much makes it easy for some people who are lazy to never go back to work, there should be a time limit as to how long they should be helped out financially.
I first thought that 2000.00 dollars was alot for a year for food stamps, but I guess it would not be enough for a family but maybe one person could survive on that for a year.
50 for every additional kid after the first one
additional funds for each additional child
Additional children get additional money, $50
Pays additional money for each child after the first
It will directly affect the voice of the American people.
Peoplemwho are eligable can recieve 400 a month of thy have one child and 40$ extra each extra child
don,t remember but think it was an additional amount for every other kid i think it was 50
had to work 20 hours to continue receiving food stamps after 1 year
400. dollars a month--50. dollars per child--also incentive to work- which I consider very important
200 on first child and 50 on the second child.
These freeloaders shoulders should be put to work as soon as possible before they can collect any benefits at all.
$200 additional for food stamps per year
The families will receive $200 per month for each additional child in the household.
No requirement to work after some period of time with help.
The amount reduces by 20% after one year.
wasnt as much money being handed out as policy 2.
after these yrs. there would be a work requirement
I already listed two facts in my previous answer.
decreasing money and weaning off and work for the money
less working class people and more welfare.
Lasts 3 years, must work 20 hours a week
Noting was sais about evr being required to work
smaller amount than policy 2 and smaller increase for additional children
It might be a litte more than needed but I'm not sure of that.Don't like to see people get lazy and not try.
Give families $200.00 per month for each child
Will provide $1000 a month for families with 1 child and additional money for the next child. Also available food stamp money.
giving my tax dollars to people that don't deserve it
giving money ($1,000.00) and food stamps for up to 7 years.
500per year with one child and 50 per child after
200 dollars extra each month per child after the first
500 extra per month for additional children
It's another way to drain more money out of the American public without regard to how the working people will be able to survive!
AN ADDITIONAL 50 A MONTH GIVEN FOR ADDITIONAL CHILDREN
family with one child would get $1000 a month
I think it was the best of the two, what I really liked was the requirement to work .. I Don't think they should be able get so much money and not have to at least do some kind of work..even for the City's..They need to get assistence I know ..How much is a big question ..
They would get $200 for every extra child.
This program can go on for 3 years without a hint of trying to work for the money at all.
Pay out $1000 to one child families and $500 for subsequent children
Would receive an additional $200 per child
Less money - with rquirement for working for food stamps, etc. after 3 years.
They want to give freeloaders money for day care and housing.
Alloted 500 a month plus 50 for each child and food stamps
They want to offer this program to the recepient for 7 years.
food stamp benefits will get an extra 2000 a year
lots of subsidies for day care and child care
There is an additional amount per family for each additional child
It offers extra help with expenses such as housing.
you would get a smaller amount for 2years and have to work after 2years
gives a $1000 for one child 200 for each add. kid
democracts want to give you some goverment assistant but make you work 20hour a week
$500 in food stamp subsidies for 5 years.
$400 per month; intended to last 3 years
for parents with 1 or more children. after the first its $200 pr child
an additional 500 a month per child was proposed.
There also trying to give benefits to cover every child in the household.
They will receive $50 additional per child per month.
90% republican support and 10% dem support
after a two year period some work would be necessary
i donot know i though i have typed all of them in!
Additional taxpayer money for additional children.
I think 500, plus 50 for each additional child
required to work 20 hours weekly after a year of additional food stamps
$1000 a month for one child family. Seven year plan. Additional $2000 per year in foodstamps. Supported by Republicans. (Which I find very hard to believe.)
After one of benefits would have to work 20 hours
People will be fined if they do not have health insurance
$2000 a month ....you tricked me with Policy 2 being first.
they get 500.00 an 50 dollars for each additional child.
Supported by 90% Republicans and 10% Democrats.
The allowance is $1000 per month for family of one child and 200 for each additional child.
something about housing don't remeber what
People had to work at least 20 hours a week.
$1,000 a month plus more for each additional child plus $2,000 additional food stamps
Would give each family $1,000 and additional $35 for Children.
after 3 years you would have to work atleast 20 hours a week
You would recieve up to two thousand dollars a year in food stamps.
Would give food stamps as part of benefits.
A handout of money and food stamps for families with children for three years...no I don't feel that this is right...
Last for 7 years - than what - more welfare?
helps only people with children who fall under the guidelines.
Extra money for every child. I know many unwed mothers having children by anyone to get this money.
must work 20 hrs a week after 1 year of benefits
monthly benefit available for housing and child care
only an additional 50 per month per child
The amount increased by $50 with each child
It never mentions anything about working for their cash assistance
They will send equivilent of $2000 in food stamps to same family
$50 additional would be available for each child after the first child.
$1000 per month per family with one child
1000/mo + 200 each additional child 7 years with additions for housing and daycare
they will get $2000.00 per yr in food stamps
not sure just know dems like to tell whats good for me want bigger gov want more taxes
90% republican 10% democrat 1000 month 200 per child 2000 food stamps extra for child care and transportation expenses
only for one year and than they would be required to work only 20 hours
Benefits were lower than those in policy #2.
The country is having to borrow forty cents out of every dollar they are spending. No more handouts.
$400/month for one child $50 for each additional
People would have to try harder to find a job to help them self out.
gave the least amount of assistance dollar wise
required to work,which i think they should.
may require some type work be performerd
One hundrd dollars per month for each additional child
$50 would be given for each additional child.
you have to work 20 hours per week after year 2
Wasn't paying that much attention. Don't really care about politics.
After two years requirement to work for 20 hours per week to receive benefits.
Additional subsidies for housing and incidentals
$1,000.00 for one child and $200.00 for each each one after and it lasted for 7 years
gIVE $400 A MONTH FOR FAMILY WITH ONE CHILD AND $50 FOR EACH MORE CHILD.
they would be requiredd to work 20hrs after the first yr
$500. for foods stamps one yr. $1000. per kid $50. for each additional
$200 per month for each additional child
after one year parent are expect to work 20 hours a week
$1000 a month plus $200 per child plus food stamps and housing allowance
There was a work requirement after one year of 20 hours a week.
The family would get $200 in food stamps
It would give an extra $100 per month for each additional child.
it alots $1000 per month and 200 additional for each child
If you rob peter to pay paul you are always garented to get paul vote
It takes our constiutional rights away,from the needy;disabled.
Returning to work for 20hours to help subsize income after 3-5 years
For each additional child, they would receive $50 each per month.
$1000 for 1st child, with $100 for additional child, additional subsidies for housing and child care
recipients would get benefits for 3 years
Additional subsidies for living expenses.
what they're offering, I don't think will last for 7 years.
1000dollars per month and 200 per child for 7 years
Period of time for this assistance is seven years.
Families would get $200 for each additional child.
Theyt have to work 20 hours after 1 year.
Want to give $1000 month plus $200 per additional child
It gave a set amount of money to welfare cases.
Increase from $500 to $1000 a month base for 7 years
after one year they must work 20 hours a week.
Gives $1000 per month for family with 1 child
You do not get any help if you do not have kids!
1000 in food stamps. 2000 is for 1 child
Also, proposes to give $50 a month in food stamps.
I THINK IS ABAD IDEA, MEANING GIVEN THEM PLATE OF FOOD THEY HAVE NO PRIDE OF GETTING THEM AND THEY GET USED TO IT...
Must go to work after a certain amount of time.....
400 PER CHILD 50. EACH EXTRA CHILD BUT HAS TO WORK FOR IT
$1000 plus $200 per child after the first
i for got the aother benfits it was giveing

Please list another fact about Policy 1:
After 1 year, have to work 20 hrs. a week
Child care ?????????????? what was the cost of.
There will be an additional $200 in food stamps made available
dont have to work and get a lot of money for doing nothing
increase by $200 for each additional child.
pays for not doing anything typical for socialists
There is nothing required on the part of the recipients.
they can receive $500 a year in food stamps
This policy would encourage un-wed women to have more and more children.
It is giving money to any freeloader that can cross our border.
20 hours of work after 1 year of benefit
It gave people $1000 plus another sum $400? per child..
Well, I put them all in the first answer.
For daily expenses, recipients would be given extra subsidies for housing and day care and diaper allowances.
There is no reason for any contributions in this policy to be made to anyone other than in the case of desperate need.
Up to 2,000 dollars in food stamps a year.
after 5 tears they would have to work 20/hr/month
there is an additional subsidy for housing
does not seems to emcourage to look for work
Families get an additional $50 per child.
more kids you have the more money you get
The extra $2000 per year would be given in the form of food stamps.
The basic allowance per month for a family with one child would be $400.
limited time of dependency..three years I believe
Recipients would have to work 20 hours a week after one year on the program.
Additional $ for each child. Can't remember exact amount but it was less than Policy 2
I said the got an additional $50 in food stamps for each extra kid after 2 did't I?
They will get reviewed in 3 years to stay on welfare.
FAMILIES WILL RECIEVE $250.00 FOR EACH ADDITIONAL CHILD.
it will give 2000 dollars a year in food stamps in addition to assistance with housing and day care
after a period of time recipents required to work 20 hours/week
After 3 years additional $200 per child.
Other children get lesser amounts per month
i think they were to receive 2,000. a yr for food stamps and they would get additional bennifits for day care and houseing
had to work 20 hours per week after 3 years
something about money for housing and other essencials
The more kids the more money they will make.
There is no demands to work as a condition of the social support.
We dont have the money for any more hand outs.
You get more money if you have more children.
Policy 1, supported by about 90% of Democrats, but only 10% of Republicans, proposed to offer recipients $400 a month for a family of one child, with an additional $50 dollars for each additional child. These benefits are intended to last for 3 years. Recipients would be eligible to receive additional benefits of up to $500 a year in food stamps. After 1 year of benefits, recipients would be required to work 20 hours per week. Policy 2, supported by about 90% of Republicans, but only 10% of Democrats, calls for $1000 per month given to recipients with families of one child, with an additional $200 dollars for each additional child. These benefits are intended to last 7 years. Recipients would receive the additional benefits of $2,000 a year in food stamps. Finally, to allow for daily expenses, recipients would be given extra subsidies for housing and day care.
Small increase for additional dependants
Eligible for up to $500 per year in food stamps.
additional $50 for each additional child
provides additional dollars for more children
There was an additional amount for each child, but I don't remember that amount.
Total foodstamps something like $356 per year
Extra help in the form of food stamps ld be available.
Families with multiple children will receive an extra $100 per a child.
$200 for each additional child per month
Each child would get an additional $50 a month
Payments would last over a certain period of years
Benefits are given too long with no work requirements.
I don't like it. It's not American where you work for what you recieve.
They would get $1000.00 for each additional child.
those t facts are enought to make a decision.
It would allow families to have 2000 per year in food stamps
I listed everything I can remember in the first question.
Families would also be given food stamps.
this policy offers a minimal amount for health care
It will lead to bankruptcy of the Federal Government.
The welfare benefits were aprox $200. per month and $50. for each dependant child.
They would also receive $500 per year in food stamps. They don't have to go to work for a whole year, and then only 20 hours per week. It's only those of us who support them that have to work full time, all the time.
I gave two facts as an answer to the first question posed but to repeat one of them "after the first child each other one will get 200"
Recipient is required to work for benefits if able.
less people will die because more people will have health insurance
They would receive help with housing and child care.
They are not making it easy to live on welfare.And its not free. They have to do some form of work for it.
Each additional child gets you $50 a month.
Paying people to have illegimate babies just makes the problem grow or grow. Cut off funds and watch the problem decrease.
Give them free daycare and they don't have to work
Family receives $2000/year in food stamps
I gave you all I could remember in the first answer
$200 per month for each additional child
people with kids get free money and food
What more do you want to hear, I think I said it all. Stop sitting on your butt waiting for a check to come in the mail.
WHO'S GOING TO PAY FOR THIS? MY GREAT GREAT GREAT GRAND CHILD? (IF HIS PARENTS COULD AFFORD TO HAVE HIM)
not giveing enough support to the people
our country is in such bad shape now they can not continue to keep giving all the moneey away
400.00 a month plus 50 for each additional child
last for 7 years i think but it could be 10
Required to work 20 hours/week after 1 year of benefits
must work 20 hours a week after 1 year of welfare
i didnt like nothing about the first policy
why should we increase our welfare state with such a giveaway ?
The qualifying families will receive up to $2000 per year in foodstamps.
Some extra amount of money for each extra child ($200??)
the government is just wasting more money.
no I'm very upset with this subject today
After 1 year a 20 hour workweek would be mandatory
Additional money is given for more than one child...
1000 dollars for having one child per month
Didn't pay enough attention to either one
Enough already! This isn't a good policy!
After 1 year, there would be a requirement of working 20 hours
The amount of money was alot more.. I really think that alot of people really need the help, and I'm sure that living in the big city is lots more exspensive that out here,but if you make it too easy , they will not try as hard.
get a job working 20 hours a week after 2 year period
The thing I like about this progam is that after a year on it they canstart to work 20 hours to help pay and give that person a sense of belonging;
They let freeloaders steal my money for 7 years.
There is no requirement to work a set number of hours per week.
gave $700 a month to lower income families
It provides and extra $200 per extra child.
after 1year, must work 20 hours per week
"Majority of residents will vote for Policy 1 before approving it from the state legislators".
10%percent of democrats support the policy
$1000 additional benefits in food stamps etc
$500 in food stamp subsidies for 5 years.
a repulican policy supported by 90 percent of republicans.
The coverage will last for only a couple of years.
Recipients will need to work 20 hrs. per week after 3 years.
how people can get money for children in the house hold
$1000 each month for families with one child
amount of handeout would increase for each additional child
Preexisting conditions are eligible for insurance and can not be dropped
Subsidies can be spent any way people like.
sorry, I'm very sorry at this point, maybe because I'm very tired, and cannot think?
I think I didn't read slow ,I can't remeber
it would add $50.00 dollars a month per child.
You would get help with housing subsidies.
this is wrong...people should earn there way, in life
Additional children will get the family more money
1000 month then 200 for each additional child
Extra food stamps for every child you have pls another 4oo for every child.
$100 is given for each additional child in a family
additional $200 per month for every other child
the more children you have the more money you get
after a short time the recipient of food stamp benefits must work 20 hrs a week
would allow addition benefits for food stamps and child care
Recipients got more health benefits with each child.
The elitistists in Washington swore an oath to defend and uphold the Constitution and all your survey cares about is how to sugar coat one more giveaway.
additional food stamps and other benefits like rent subsidy will also be available
Inpolicy1 things aregood and the peoples are great.They are doings agreat job.
After one year, parents would have to work 20 hours per week.
Wasn't paying that much attention. Don't really care about politics.
up to 500 in food stamps a yr. After a year work for 20 hours.
After 2 years they must work 20 hours a week
It would pay $500 a month to the recipient and an addtional $50 amonth for each child for three years.
Any child after your first was poorly rated
They would get these benefits for 3 years and have to work 20 hr a week after that time
It would give extra subsidies such as housing.
They think all the money that goes to the congess belongs to them it is not true it is our money not there s
These people would also be given $500 in food stamps.
Why work when you get payed to sit around?
After 7 years, food stamps would be given to the person on welfare.
Would receive $500 per year for food stamps
then they would get food stamps valued $500 for another year
At closure the family may recieve $1,000.00 in food stamps per montn.
The first child would bring a payment of $2000.
it encourges people to " stay in the system"
They would receive an extra $50.00 per month per child.
it gives people some help to get started
parents would only have to work 20 hours a week
GIVEN FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS AND FIFTY FOR EACH ADDITIONAL CHILD..

Please list another fact about Policy 1:
will add additional benefits per child in household
500 dollars plus money for children and a plan for 3 years and changes
after a year they have to get a job working 20 hours a week
after several years they will have to work 20 hrs
Doesn't require the recipient to do anything for their free money
Ensures part of benefit is spent on food
Would give $1000 to a family with one child
i noticed that you did not mention the circumstances that this bill is addressing. who are these families?
Again...put them all in the first answer.
extra subsidies for housing and day care.
You sound like Obama treating Republicans and scolding them like elementary children.
I find no reason to distribute funds simply because a certain number of children are involved indefinitely
Families can get up to $500 a year in food stamps.
Additional subsidies would be given for housing and child care expenses.
$500 per year would be allowed for food stamps for a family.
got me.........can't think of anything else too late in the day for me to be quizzed
There's only so many goddamn facts in your little hypothetical.
Additional $ for food stamps per year. Can't remember amount but it was far less than Policy 2.
Have to go to work 20 hours/week after a certain period.
It gives money to worthless pieces of life
additional help and subsidies for housing and day care
Policy 1, supported by about 90% of Democrats, but only 10% of Republicans, proposed to offer recipients $400 a month for a family of one child, with an additional $50 dollars for each additional child. These benefits are intended to last for 3 years. Recipients would be eligible to receive additional benefits of up to $500 a year in food stamps. After 1 year of benefits, recipients would be required to work 20 hours per week. Policy 2, supported by about 90% of Republicans, but only 10% of Democrats, calls for $1000 per month given to recipients with families of one child, with an additional $200 dollars for each additional child. These benefits are intended to last 7 years. Recipients would receive the additional benefits of $2,000 a year in food stamps. Finally, to allow for daily expenses, recipients would be given extra subsidies for housing and day care.
After a year required to work 20 hours a week.
Those are the most important things I remember.
There are additional benefits including $2,000 extra.
90 PERCENT OF DEMOCRATES APROVE THIS BILL
Number of children determineing how much money is given.
It allows for 1000 per month for families with one child
There is a subsidy of $1,000 for the first child.
additional $100 per month for each additional child
It is an irresponsible spending without any provision for its payment (taxes or cutting elsewhere)
This policy was supported by 90% of the Democratic Party.
$500/monthly benefit with $50 for each additional child
Since t involved subsidizing which I am against I failed to pay much attention and cannot remember anything else about it.
children insured until 26 yrs old, (if attending school)
Nobody can live on that income.They would be looking for work.
We are becoming a nation of "entitlements". People think they are entitled to everything without working,saving, being moral, etc.
Food stamps, but can't remember the amount.
Family receives $200 for each additional child
There would be more money given if more than one child
its all about power, cronyism and corruption.
people with kids get free money and food
BENEFITS WOULD INCREASE FOR LIVING EXPENCES.
400 per month with a camily with one child.
IT'S AN ELECTION YEAR-ONE PARTY IS TRYING TO "OUT-GIVE" THE OTHER!
not sure about 200.00 each additional child would be enough or too much.
$200 more a month for each child over the first child.
I know 1000 a month is not much but I the time frame should be shortened--
We should have work fare instead of welfare.
This is supose to be a survey not a college test.
would have to work 20 hours to continue benefits
Look policy 1 is a handout just like policy 2 is a hand out, nothing more to say about these two policies.
I felt the money was more and that some times that is a way for them to loose the will to want to work..
Democratics favor by 90% while only 10 % of republicans favor
supported by 90% democrats and 10% republicans
Would receive $500 a month in food stamps
They give free loaders enormous amounts of my money for food stamps.
didn't lik it so didn't remember much more
"Policy 1 would pass or fail once the legislators discuss the items and come up with resolutions too".
additional 50 dollars per child after first child per month
policy 1 will give 50dollars for each chid
They are required to work 20 hours per week.
$200 additional for each additional child in the family
nothing said about requiring a search for work
Guarantee choice of doctors and health plans
They have to work to get money fromthe government
The policy statements were very poorly written.
I'm sorry, but by now, I don't remember the questions, can you help please??
I think that you would get a hundred dollars per child.
After certain time on benefits, 20 hours work per week would be required.
This is not America, this is stupid...to give people all these giveaways...
Extra expenses paid for housing and such
each add'l child gets parents more money
base amount of benefit with additional for each child
It was supported by 90% of republicans and 10% of democrats.
They apparently recieve this money and food stamp help with no assurances that a job with be searched for during this time
required to work 20 hours after benefit of 3 years
Recipients also got money for food stamps.
The policy 1 istaking care of the job and they are getting whateveryneeded to be done.
give more money for first child than others
Families would also be eligible for about $500 in food stamps per year.
Wasn't paying that much attention. Don't really care about politics.
That the amount of money offered would not be anywhere close to the amount that would be required
its the kind of polices that got us in to the mess were in
They would required to work 20 hours after the first year.
If its to good to be true,then it's to good to be true.
It would benefit those who need the help. There would be additional money provided for living expenses.
Receiptants would need to work 20 hrs per week after the 1st year of benefits.
Additional funds for additional children.
An additional child increases the amount per month by $200.00.
There would be food stamps given to the families.
After the seven years, more subsidies would be given to help the family out.

Now, please list a fact about Policy 2:
1000 a month, 200 for each additional child,
Gives less money to families with children
I do not like any of the factsin policy 2.
It will also teach the people to just have their hand out again, but in a worse way.
$400 per month for a one-child family, with an additional $50 for each additional child
I was so irritated about number one, I didn't look so close at number 2! I believe it said 500.00 for three years, with 50.00 for each child after the first
good for three years less money to family and required to work 20 hours a week afterwards
Not good. But encourages people to go to work.
1000/mo for one child and 200 for addl child up to seven years
I remember $50.00 for each additional kid.
$500 for the first child and $50 for each additional child for up to 3 years with food stamps and housing allowance. Must work at least 20 hours a week after the first year.
$2,000 a month per child, $200 each additional child
would receive more money because of longer payments
$450 per month to each family with children
Too much money for doing nothing really like a democrat socialist plan
they would recieve $100 a month with $50 per child.
Families would be given benefits of $1000 dollars a month.
some thing about requiring 20 hours of work
Benefits for families with one child would be 1000 dollars
an amount of money for a person with 1 child and food stamps
$400 a month for a family with one child
It was somewhat less, but I still don't like it and wouldn't support lit.
each family will be give $200 a month for one child
A higher stipend for families - up to $5000
like at least they half to work to get help
It is essential for us to survive as the greatest country in the world.
A little more reasonable, makes those people work for the benefits instead of just a free handout
It gives families with 1 child 400 dollars a month.
$1000 per month for families with 1 child;
You need to go to work in the end...Hurray
$500 per month for a family with one child
to offer recipients $400 a month for a family of one child, with an additional $50 dollars for each additional child.
Policy 2 simply extends the benefits pertaining to Policy 1
will mandate 20 hours of required work after 1 year.
Families with 1 child are given $1000 dollars with an additional $200 per child.
Recipients will get 300 per month for 1 child and 50 extra fir additional children
a family with one child would get 1,000.00 a month in food stamps
20 hours of work a week after 1 year of benefits required
More money you will get $1000 a year for 7 years
Encourage the party to try and stand on own two feet
Smaller dollar amount for each child; subsequent children receive less
thats even worse 1000 of us taxpayers money to the welfare
A base monthly pay of $400 would be given to each family with one child.
The amount allowable would continue for 7 years.
less money given but still making people dependent on government
Supported by 90% of D, but only 10% of R. $500 per year for single child family, with $50 per extra child. Good for 3 years. Additional $400 in food stamps per year. Requires 20 hours of work per year after 1 year.
Give $xxxx to parents of a child and provide them with childcare and something else.
$2000 a year for a family with one child $700 more for each additional child
receive $2000 for a family with one child.
You get $1000 amonth for 7 years plus $1000 in food stamps and an additional $500 for eah kid after 2.
500 first child 50 for other 500 a mounth food stamps for three years then have to work 20 hours a weak
The family can receive welfare for 7 wears.
Requires receipent to work at least 20 hrs a week
it only gives recipitants only 500 dollars a month
It is supported by a majority of Democrats.
It gives even more money to worthless pieces of human life.
lower monthly amount, last 3 years, 500.00 food stamps.
Would require the recipient to work 20 hours a week.
500.00 per month 50.00 per child housing food stamps 400.00 after 4 years 20 hours of work a week.
$1000 a month for familes with one child.
they give 500 per family whith one child
must work 20 hours/week after first year
a set amount of money for a long period of time
given 1000$ for family of one child and 200$ for each additional child
Qualified families will get less money than policy 1.
Have to work 20 hours a week after 7 years of receipt of social benefits.
$300 per month for 3 years for a family with one child
Similar, but more like help than life style system.
500 dollar 100 for each child and at lest they work 20 hrs. a weak for it.
You get paid quite a bit for not working. And for quite a while.
Giving taxpayer dollars to have more children
supported by about 90% of Republicans, but only 10% of Democrats, calls for $1000 per month given to recipients with families of one child, with an additional $200 dollars for each additional child. These benefits are intended to last 7 years. Recipients would receive the additional benefits of $2,000 a year in food stamps. Finally, to allow for daily expenses, recipients would be given extra subsidies for housing and day care.
the money and food stamps was much higher
family who has one child will receive 200 and $50 each addition child
Old welfare policy before welfare reform
50 dollars per child after the first one.
Must work 20 hours per week at after you receive extra income for children.
Another entitlement program which we can ill afford
1000 a mouth plus health care good for 7yrs
$1000 a month for families with one child.
It is also an entitlement program, although less expansive than Policy #1.
hundreds of dollars given to families, $50 per additional child. The program lasts for 3 years
The luxury of getting paid $1,000 a month to do nothing
$100/mo plus $500/child over 1. 7 years term. $2000/year food stamps
$400 per first child and $200 for others for first year and after that work at least 20 hours per week
Gives $1,000 to the family of one child.
Families are required to work at least 20 hours after three years in order to receive more money.
Help with some money for awhile then get a job.
$500 per month and $1,000 food stamps per year
Required to work after a certain period of time.
Policy 2 also pays you for having children.
They would get $50.00 for each additional child.
they would have to work at least 20 hours a week
Have to work after having a year of benefits.
Allows for 400 per month to each family with one child
The first child gets $500 (?) and each child thereafter gets $300.
welfare recpits would get 2.000 amonth plus extra for each addinal child
$1000/mo benefits for family with one child.
this policy offers $2000 for the first child
after one year, would have to work at least 20 hours/day
It is less irresponsible than Policy 1, in that it would spend less and therefore do less damage to our national debt.
clients would rceive $1,000.00/mntly for a family of one child.
This policy was widly supported by the Republican Party.
They would receive $1000 per month with 1 child, and $200 per month for each additional child.
Parents will get 4 or 5 hundred for their first child.
400 a month food stamps, per family w 1 child, plus 50 per month for each additional child.
Each family would receive $400 per one child, $50 for each additional child.
They would give them twice as much as policy one 1,000 a month.
The same responses I gave for policy 1 fit policy 2. I am opposed to constant giveaways. Anyone can make one mistake but don't reward people for purposefully doing it over and over.
The recipient would receive a payment of 200 monthly.
The monetary amount for one child was $1000.
people with kids get free money and food
$1,000/mo. for a family w/1 child $200 for each additional child
500 a month plus 50 per child for 3 years and they have to work after a period of time.
THIS POLICY WOULD GIVE $400 A MONTH TO A FAMILY WITH ONE CHILD,AND $50 FOR EACH ADDITIONAL CHILD.
Additional funding for housing and child care.
lasta for one year then work is required
people getting money but having to work some for it.
Policy 2 will allow recipient to receive 400 dollars per month per family including one child
parent had to work at least 20 hrs a week after receiving mney
I think it is much better help out a little and make they people get some kind of job to help their selves out as well
I think 500.00 might not be enough for food stamps for a family.
1000 a month for a one child familu plus 200 for every additional child
$400 a month for each family with one child
must work in some capacity to receive benefits
499 PER MONTH AND 50 EACH CHILD FOR 4 YEARS THEN 20 HOURS WORK FOR BENS
republican 90% for. $1000 first child 400 each after
additional child gets extra food stamps in the house
600 month plus more for additional children + food stamps. less than 7 years and hinges on working after 1 year
I mentioned 400 a month plud 50 per child--a shorter time frame
They have to go to work in the second year.
$2000 a month benefit for household with one child.....$2000 a year max in food stamps.....additional for each child....max three year receive benefits, after one year must work 20 hours per week.
$400 per family with one child, and an additional $50 per child
we should have work care instead of welfare.
$1000 per month for family with 1 child,
Not enough support to survive. This is more like a republican plan
Each family that has 1 child in it's household will receive $300 per month.
$1000.00 a month for the first child and 200.00 a month for each additional child for 7 years.
another government handout just like policy 1 exept this si from the progressives.
republicians are in favor of paying more monies over a longer period of time for welfare families.
Semed like it might not be enough to get along on if you were not able to work at all.
Families would receive $1,000.00 per month
$400 is given to a family with more than one child...
both policies are misguided attempts to assist those deadbeats of the country.
1000.00 each child, for 7 years and 1000.00 additional to food stamps
It provided money and the ability to provide food for the table, yet also understands that a person needs to earn their living to appreicate what they have.
1000 GIVEN PER MONTH FOR A FAMILY WITH 1 CHILD
This policy is worse. It is giving more money to people.
The money semmed more reasonable. I have no idea what the cost of raising a child anymore , but I'm sure it's alot! There are so many illegals in this area and i know there are alot on Welfare.. Illegal ones are the most useing it ..They live with the legal ones and draw welfare to support then all.. They have learned to use us real well !!
Welfare recipients would receive $500/month
Democrat Policy. To give a $500 tax credit for those who have one child and then additional amount of $50 in aid for 3 years.
500 dollars a month with other benifits and after a year they would be required to work at least 20 hours a week
$1000.00 month for family with one child
After a year on the program they can at least start to work on a 20 hour progam to help the system and themselves.
government would start at $IOO WITH AN ADDIONAL $50 over time
400 dollars for a family with one child, and $50 for every other.
policy say family of 2 get $1000 for food stamp for 7yr
They give less of my money to freeloaders.
Each receipt would recieve $500 a month.
There is a smaller initial benefit for families with one child.
a little less money up front and then more afterward until it reaches the same amount
gave $1000 per month to low income families
It provides $500 to familes with one child.
"Services concerning Policy 2 are very expensive because some familiies have low income as well as receiving SSI once a month."
GIVE 400 IN FOOD STAMPS FOR FAMILIES OF 1 CHILD
i think people that are on monthy check should get a one more time raise
Requires recipient to get a job after a few years (I think 3)
offers 400 a month to families with 1 or more children.
The policy is the same except they offer twice as much in funding.
helping out families in the long run, which is out standing.
90% Republicans and 10% of Dem's support, $2000 month plus $100 per extra child. #1,000 annual food stanps.
Recipients will receive $1000 per month for 3 years for 1 child.
400 dollars for 1 child and 50 each additional
a longer period of dole without any work
1000 a month for a family with one child.
t will make our country into a socialst nation It will put our nation into bankrupcy.
after a year you would have to work at least 20 hoursa week
$400 per month for a family with one child
Maintain coverage when you change or lose your job
They are giving the money to the people an they don't have to work.
same answer, can you help please? can I go back and read again? sorry
1000.00 per one child family, food stamps 200.00 or 2000.00 a yr for 7 yrs and housing I think
People can get 1000 a month in money from welfare.
20 HOUR WORK. $1000. MONTH.$50. EXTRA PER CHILD 2 YEARS
NOT GIVING AS MUCH MONEY NOR FOOD STAMP AS NUMBER ONE
Requires a work program after a time period
2000.00 dollars for one child an 500.00 for each additional.
it provides $1000.00 a month for welfare
You would only get help for one year then you would have to find work for at least twenty hours a week.
Would give $1000 a month to families, $200 per each additional child.
People need to work, so they can be part of a civilization, not rewared for doing nothing...
would get 2000 to help out for expensens
it would provide for a parent with one child
gives parents less per child over less years.
1000 dollars initial benefitsfor a family with one child.
After 1 year, required to work 20 hours per week.
after one year of receiving assistance, 20 hours per week are required to be worked.
In the portion shown it did not make mention of the individuals being required to work.
$1000 per month for families with one child
You are capped off on your benefits at 3 years.
It distrubutes $400 per month to families with one child and $50 per month for each additional child.
Every family with 1 child in it will receive $500 a month for 3 years
$500.00 per year with 1 child and $50.00 any additional children
would give $1,000.00 a month to a family w/one child
you would get more food stamps for 5 years
oops i messed up! gave less money than 1
to know that dem. didn't look out for the people is sad.
Recipients weren't required to go to work - ever.
after th time limit is up participants will be required to work 20 hrs per week
Didn't say anything about requiring work
Republicans favor this policy over Democrats.
did not say anything about a party seeking work of any kind
democret version, 400 a month-50 dollars for every child- for four years after that reqiuerd to work 20 hours a week.
One thousand dollars per month for family of four.
Families with one child would receive $2000.
Wasn't paying that much attention. Don't really care about politics.
1000 per month with a family with 1 child.
It gives up to $1,000.00 plus additional for childred up to 7 years then you work (again work where???)
$L000 A MONTH FOR FAMILY OF ONE ANE $200 MORE FOR EACH CHILD FOR 7 YEARS WITH $2,000 FOR FOOD STAMPS AND HOUSING SUBSIDIES.
$400 A MONTH FOR A FAMILY WITH ONE CHILD
parents will recieve $200.for each child every month
1000/child #1, 200/ child >1, 2000/yr stamps, last 7 years
It was supported by 90% republicans and 10% Democrats.
That you don't have to work to continue to recieve benefits
The family of 1 would recieve $1,000 a month
It would give $500 per month to a family with one child.
These people would receive $1000 a month for one child and $200 a month for each additional child.
that will get people off welfare and support their kids
if you get to mush you will not want to work.
1000 per month for a family with one child
It would provide $400 per month for the first child, $50 additional per month for each additional child. .
will get 400 for a family with one child
the monies given to families with children would be less per year and would only last 3 years
Receiptants would receive $1000.00 per month for families with 1 child
some of their thoughts are not pleasing.
400 dollars a month for families with more than one child.
All I can remember is the recipients being made to work.
Couples got $1000 for their first child.
After 3 years on this program, the people have to work at least 20 hours a week.
$450 dollar for 1st child and then $50 per each additional child
$500 is given per family with one child.
Again, too much giveaway to people who are too sorry to work for a living.
it encourges people to get "out of the system"
Recipients must work at least 20 hours per week.
It was favored by the magority of the republicans
it offered 1000 dollars a month for families of one child, and an additional 500 dollars in food stamps
family of one gets $1000 per child with $200 for each addictional child.
$400 - only child . . . 3 years . . . %50 any other kids
You are required to work some for this help.
500 for first child. 200 in food stamps, must work 20 hours a week after 1 year
proposes to give families with one child $1000 a month in assistance
400 amonth one child 50 more per child 500 a month food stamps after one year must work 20 hours a week
the help they are offering is low but it makes sense if this country is to servie
give househole 500 a monht for each child 50 dollers for each child

Please list another fact about Policy 2:
It offers no permanent solution, like a job.
They require 20 hours of work a week after 1 year
It provided more money up front than Policy 1
They would receive $500 a month for food stamps
For each additional child, the family would receive an additional $200 dollars.
Extra money given for children but I think it was 50 dollars
There is a 7-year timeframe for part of it.
Does not say anything about the recipient working.
People would be required to work after a certain time
must wor 20 hours a week after a given period of time
After a year (?) requires 20 hours of work
A longer period of time for this "gift" - 7 years
Initial amount given is higher than the Democratic policy.
requires recipient to work 20 hours a week
Keeps those people from making a ton of extra money just by SPITTING OUT MORE BABIES
I liked that it gave less than policy one and that was enough for me to read to like it better.
after one year, the recipient has to work at least 20 hours per week.
After 1 year of benefits, recipients would be required to work 20 hours per week.
Must work at least 20 hours after the 3 years.
The extent of benefits cannot be seriously considered by anyone in their right mind
Collect up to 2,000 dollars in food stamps.
This policy included a limit for food stamp usage.
I have a 77 year old memory. Don't expect too much.
Families get an additional $200 per child.
Requirement to seek employment within a certain time frame
An additional $20 per month would be granted for each additional child.
$200 would be allowed for each child after one.
they must work 20 hrs a week after year 2
400dollars each mo. 50dollars for a child.good for a year.
Supported by 90% of Republicans, and 10% of Democrats
$2000 in food stamps and other financial support
I don't know. I just noticed there was a big difference in the 2 policies.
FAMILIES WILL RECIEVE $50 FOR EACH ADDITIONAL CHILD.
it only gives 50 dollars for each additional child
It provides eligible families with $400.00 per month.
$200.00 4 each additional child. 4 7yrs.
I do not believe that Republicans support that. I have never heard that proposal from a Republican.
Up to $2000 extra in foodstamps per year.
a set amount for food stamps for a set amount of time
Social benefits also applies to familiew with children.
required to work after 3 years for a minimum of 20 hours per week...
The more kids you have, the more money you get.
After one year of free money, a person will on;y have to work 20 hrs (half-time) to continue receiving taxpayer dollars for having children
supported by about 90% of Republicans, but only 10% of Democrats, calls for $1000 per month given to recipients with families of one child, with an additional $200 dollars for each additional child. These benefits are intended to last 7 years. Recipients would receive the additional benefits of $2,000 a year in food stamps. Finally, to allow for daily expenses, recipients would be given extra subsidies for housing and day care.
after 2 years they will have to find a job
Encouraged multi-generational dependence on welfare
Longer time frame (7 vs 4 years, I think).
Food stamps plus 20 hours of work/month after a year.
Does not require work buring the benefit period
Although it does not provide as much as policy #1, it does provide funds to individuals with increasing amounts for each child. It also has provisions for food stamps.
no justification for this program, i don't remember any guidelines, I don't know who pays for this program
second or additional children get less benefits
duration is shorter and is followed by work
200.00 per month for each additional child.
The funding is over after 3 years, but can be renewable.
Sometimes everyone needs some help getting back on their feet. Then get to work and help someone else.
$400 per month for families with 1 child
After one year, recipients are required to work 20 hours a week
WHY WORK HAVE BABIES ASWHATI'VESEENAROUNDHEREINGOV'TPROJECTSTHATAREILLEDUPWITHSINGLEMOTHERS B U T THEYHAVE m E N S SHOES UNDER THEIR BEDS AND FEEDING THEM WITH THE FOOD STAMPS AND THE CHILDREN GO WITHOUT.
they will receive a certain amount per month per kid
Tha amount of payment for each child is less than for Policy 1 but it is too much (any amount is too much)
after a while the food stamps would stop
Recipiants will be required to work to pay back the money.
this policy offers an additional amount for each additional child
extra 200.00 per month for each additional child
It proposes increasing entitlements without providing a method of funding the cost.
Welfare recipiants could receive benefits of aprox $1,000. per month.
called for work of 20 hours per week on the part of the recipiate
addiional 50 dollars for each additional child
Lesser amount of money for any other children
Families will receive 50 for each remaining child.
after 1 year they must work at least 20 hours a week to continue on the program.
They would get a one time food money for $500.
They would get 7 years instead of 5 yrs on welfare.
$2000 per year after that in food stamps
We need to go by the rules and laws in the Bible.....help those truly in need (blind, crippled, etc.) but people who can work should work - no work, no pay.
$400 per month to a family with one child.
After a certain period of time,help with payments for child care would be instituted
This policy would be in effect for 7 years
people with kids get free money and food
Money for each additional child was more than Policy 1.
TOO MANY PLACES FOR EXPENSIVE "AMENDMENTS"
If they are not getting every thing handed to them they are more apt to go back to work
after 3 years reciepient has to work a 20 hour a week
I am not sure about working 20 hours a week, especially the way jobs are today. Might be impossible.
2000 a year in food stamps, last 7 years
$50 extra for each extra child over first child
not enough food stamps to make much difference
7 year span. extra subsidaries for living and childcare
$400 will be received per month with one child
50 on second child, and provide day care serive
Benefist mroe generous than those of the Dems
we should have work care instead of welfare.
allows for $1000/month + $200/each child. allows for $2000/year in food stamps.
Each family receives an additional $50 per child after the 1st.
Require to work 20 hours/week after some time receiving help.
WE NEED WORK NOT HAND OUTS. IF WE HAVE JOBS WE CAN BUY OUR OWN FOOD, TAKE CARE OF OUR OWN CHILD.
more reasonable and give incentive for these people to work and get off welfare
Additional money is given to a family with more than one child...
$500 per month for a family with one child
50 dollars for every child after the first per month
20 hours of work required at second year
It's a short term help to get someone on their feet without letting them settle into the rut of being provided for and that they don't have to work for their needs but will be taken care of by those who do work!
ADDITIONAL 500 PER CHILD GIVEN AFTER THAT
The government would spend a lot less with this plan than with Policy 1.
There would be more money to help other people in need and to work around the money given to them.
benefit would go up to $500 and would cover children
That after a specified period part-time work 20 hours per week.
Supported by 90% republicans and 10% democrats
They give the freeloaders a 3 year limit.
Effective period is shorter than for policy 1
For each additional child would receive $50 a month.
The additional amount for additional children is less than the additional amount on Policy 1.
50 dollars foodstamps eacj additional child
It provides an extra $50 per extra child.
hve to work 20hrs a week after first year of ben.
$50 per month extra per additional child
policy 2 wanted to give less money than policy1
#2000 worth of benefits in additional benefits
offers 50 more per month per child and up to 200 in food stamps
They also offer twice as much for the children.
Recipients will receive $2000 in food stamps per month.
I did not see any thing that was in it that I thought was positive
that is all i remember i have read every thing i saw but i just dut remember!
would be required to work 29 hrs per week to remain eligible after first year
Involved a lot MORE taxpayer money being given. (Obviously a Democrat bill!)
50 extra dollars a month for each child after the first one
Assure affordable, quality health coverage for all Americans
would pay more benifits for longer than policy 1. In my opnion you have revirsed the partys for policy 1 and 2.
they get 1000.00 an 200.00for additional kids
family of one child receive $400 per month
People could get 200 dollars for every child after the first.
would have to get a part time job after 3 yrs
it allows $200.00 dollars a month per extra child.
You would only get fourty dollars per child.
each child after the first gets parents more money
each additional child brings in an additional $50
after 1 year you have to work 20 hours per week
monthly allotment for family with one child
Makes the recipients put out more effort to receive the money.
The ammount of money allotted was higher than policy #1.
additional $200 per month for each extra child
Each additional child will receive $50 a month
$400 per month per family with one child
90 percent of Republicans favor and 10 percent of Democrats favor
20 hrs of work would be required after 3 years
$500 would be given for each additional child
$400 per month for a family of one child
supported by 90% Republicans and 10% Dems
People will not try as hard to help them self.
to much money was given away for the 7years
they have a better grip on the needs of familes
Two hundred dollars for each additional child.
These benefits could last for up to 7 years.
Wasn't paying that much attention. Don't really care about politics.
AFTER SO LONG THEY HAVE TO WORK 20 HOURS A WEEK
after seven years they are expected to go back to work
$50 extra a month for each additional child
The recipient would receive $1000 a month plus an allowance for each child.
That the amount of assistance given is fairly reasonable.
The family would get $700 food stamps a month
It would give an extra $50 for each additional child.
Iam not into hand out leave the private sector alone would be a big help
other subsidies if they atteneded daycare or child care
$1000 per child and $50 additional child
It will allow people to give back;feel good about themselfs.
200 dollars per child for each additional child
It would provide a set amount yearly for food stamps.
at the end of three years the family would need to go to work to keep the monies coming
The People on welfare would get a lot less each year compared to Policy 1.
They would receive an additional $200 per child, per month
They would get $200 extra per additional child
A family with 1 child can draw $400.00 per month
It gave $1,000 to families with one child with more for additional children
They would receive an extra $2000.00 per year in food stamps.
it also offered housing and daycare subsidaries
have to work 20 hours for hike in foodstamps after so long
You still do not get help if you do not have children.
proposes to give families with one child $2000 a year in food stamps
gives more for welfare and food stamps than plan 1
you got to work 20 hours a week to recivse food stamp asetives

Please list another fact about Policy 2:
less money for extra kids than policy 1 ($50)
It offers about $500 a year in food stamps
Person will be required to work at least 20 hours per week
Don't have to work after a certain time period, or at least it didn't mention anything about it.
The benefits would continue for 7 years.
Given initial amount but then expected to work to continue
It was supported by 10% of Republicans, but I wouldn't support it.
i believe the term was 3 years and after that the adult would be required to work 20 hours a week.
The overall cost is more to the taxpayer.
Lasts 7 years without people working for it
It allows for true growth and prosperity.
Makes the people a little more responsible, doesn't give them a total free ride "forever"
supported by 90% republicans & 10% democrats
It was for less money a month and less years.
After the first year, must work at least 20 hours per week
would add 50 .00 for each additional dependent.
After 2 years need to work 20 hours per week
Would have to find a job after that 7 years
Additional money for additional children (forget exact amount)
There is no limit to the extent of what is proposed in Policy 2 because I believe it is extremely liberal and I do not approve any of the "facts"
20 hours of work per week will be required after 1 year
lesser amount for 'other expensis ?$400?
Families get $1000 if they have one child.
It provides for more children than policy 1.
They had to do 20 hours of work by a certain time
The policy would stay in effect for 3 years.
AFTER THREE YEARS HAVE TO GET HALF A JOB
daily expenses and child care i like that
Additional $ for each child. Far more than Policy 2.
The Democrats liked the first policy and the Republicans liked the second policy. Ninety percent of the Republicans didn't like the first policy.
AFTER 1 YEAR ON THE PROGRAM, FAMILIES WILL BE REQUIRED TO WORK 20 HOURS PER WEEK.
recipitants will only receive benifits for 5 years
It also provides families with food stamps.
It gives way too much money to people who do not deserve it.
not sure exactly but included something if the recipients got a job
$500 per year in food stamps to be given to each family.
they are just giving them a silver platter they need to learn people how to work for their money
after one year of help you need to work at least 20hrs per week
for the each additional child $50 per family
rhe best thing they can have some self pride by eatning the money
90% of Republicans believe this should happen.
mientra el pobre tenga dinero va a gastal so el dinero va a silcular so las tiendas benefisia tanbien
supported by about 90% of Republicans, but only 10% of Democrats, calls for $1000 per month given to recipients with families of one child, with an additional $200 dollars for each additional child. These benefits are intended to last 7 years. Recipients would receive the additional benefits of $2,000 a year in food stamps. Finally, to allow for daily expenses, recipients would be given extra subsidies for housing and day care.
after expiration other services and benefits are available
After 10 years required to get a job of at least 20 hrs a week
It has twice the fudning for a family the Policy 1
The only thing about this entitlement is that after a period of time it does require individuals to perform some work, but only 20 hours per week.
provides higher dollar amounts of benefits than policy one
After one year had to work 20 hours a week.
Parents can receive up to $500 for their first child.
Get some help, then get a job to help someone else.
additional $50 per month for each addtl kid
$400 per month for a family with one child
after 1 year free help for 20 hours a week
IT GIVES THE WOMAN MORE TIME TO GO OUT AMD PLAY ON FREE MONEY AND THAT'S WHAT MOST GUYS ARE LOOKIG FOR.
significantly greater $$$$ than policy 1
They would have to work 20 hours a week after the first year to keep benefits.
Does not allow for stipends for living allowances,etc
extra money given for housing and welfare
The workers will work part-time - 20 hours.
this policy offers $2000 for food stamps
It is slightly less irresponsible than Policy 1.
The welfare benefits could be distributed to a family for up to 7 years.
they will watch me with a computer chip inseted into me when i get a check up through the socialist doctor.
They also would get $2000 per year in food stamps.
The food stamp subsidy was less than the other plan.
They would be required to work for 20 hours a week to receive assistance.
I think you get $100 for each additional child
Again, I say that I disagree with both policies for the same reasons.
Family receives additional $50/month for each additional child.
people with kids get free money and food
RECIPIENTS WOULD RECEIVE $500 A YEAR IN FOOD STAMPS.
50 more dollars per month for more additional children
NOT ENOUGH IN SOME AREAS ANDTOO MUCH IN OTHERS-
differing amounts of money per number of children
50.00 dollars for each additional child might be a better number. I am not sure.
Requires 20 hours of work a week after a proscribed amount of time
Pays $50 per month for each additional child
recipient required to work at least 20 hours a week after 1st year
i don,t remember any more except i think this is socialism at it,s worst
i didnt approve of this policy either! it would last 3 yrs.
does not define who gets it or where the money comes from.
we should have work fare instead welfare.
nothing about enouraging people to find work
The qualifying households will receive up to $500 a year in foodstamps.
must work after a certain amount of time has passed
would get money for food stamps, housint and day care
I thougth the food & rent allotment were jpretty low
They would receive $500.00 per month for each child
I like that they have to do work after 1 year and I think they should have to work 40 hrs. a week like everybody else
They money given to the family is less than Policy 1.
too much for additional kids... dont remember $ amount but i do think it was too much
It's better than policy 1. A short term fix.
The food stamps are lessand that could be raised a lttle more for a bigger family.
persons would be required to work 20 houres a week
They Require they bums to work at least 20 hours a week. I like that.
$50.00 dollars for each additional child
There is a requirement that eventually, the person receiving the benefits must start working.
After 1 year, the parent is required to get a full time job.
"Policy 2 has the highest costs of medical or health or whatever types of services that children needs to give them that care."
additional 200 dollars per child starting with the second child.
policy 2 made you have to get a job as to receve assited policy 1 give money than cut you off
possible additional sum more kids -- $200 or $400 per month - can't remember which
a democratic proposal,after a year recipeints would have to work 20 hours per week.
They benefits are covered longer than policy 1.
Beneficiary can also receive a housing allowance.
you'll be eligible for subsidies, housing and child care assistance
Protect families from bankruptcy or debt because of health care costs
must for 20 hours per week after the first year
they get additional 200. dollars of food stamps at the end of the year
Working 20 hours per week gets you more assistance.
$500 a month plus additional for housing etc
Not realistic for a Democrat proposal, very un charistic.
can receive up to $2000 a year in food stamps
Will have to tork 20 hours a week to receive benefits
additional allowance for each additional child
Seem's to encurage finding work, and becoming self-sufficient.
Neither policy stated to whom the policy would apply.
It requires participats to begin working a minimum of 20 hours per week after the first year.
The family will have to prove they have found a job within a year of the program.
additional $50 oer month for every other child
after 3 years must work at least 20 hrs per week
no requirement to get off of the program
Beneficiaries received additional benefits like subsidized housing.
food stamp benefits will also be available
Families receive $1000 for one child and $200/each add'l child. Food stamp benefits up to $2000/yr.
don't remember,that amount was shocking!
and give an additional total of 1000 in foodstamps
makes people rely on the Gov. rather than them selves
Each policy had food stamps but I don,t remenber the amounts.
Families are also eligible for $2000 in food stamps.
Wasn't paying that much attention. Don't really care about politics.
20 hours of work was required after the first year
Additional money for food stamps, but less than POlicy 1
after three years recip0ient must work at least 20 hours a week to retain benefits
After one year of receiving benefits, they must find a job and work at least 20 hours a week
The benefits would last for seven years.
its to costly.and it realy dosent help people to get out of the rut their in.
It would give $400 per month in food stamps.
requires 20 hours of work per week after 3 years
They would be given $2000 in food stamps
We the people are tired of the haves;haves nots.
It would last up to 3 years and then you would be required to work a minimum of 20 hours per week.
this lasting for 3 years and then are expected to work
I can't remember. It is 11:29 pm and I am getting tired. Sorry.
Could receive these benefits for 7 years.
seem like some should be on the other side.
20 hours of work required after 2 years.
Y'all got me this time, I will not do another survey when I have a tooth bothering me. I can't remember nothing.
required to work 20 hours a week for after 3 years
It was probably a trick bill on the part of the Republicans.
We might be able to afford this one in spite of Bush's wars.They would add $50.00 per child for more children.
20 hours/ week work required for ALL recipients parents.
Again too much giveaway, we already supporting 1/2 the country, don't they think that is enough
They would receive an extra $400.00 per child.
after the seven years they get $2000 in food stamps and extra help for housing.
also proposing to make other subsidies to help needy families

Please list another fact about Policy 2:
after 1 year had to work 20 hours a week
Still wanting to give additional benefits such as housing and food stamps
Another $50/month per child over the first
After 2 years they would be required to work for 20 hours a week.
After which they would be expected to work a set amount of hours a week.
Would be provided subsidies for child care
included subsidies for housing and other factors
After 3 years - must work 20 hr/ week for continued benefits
It was supported by 90% of the Democrats.
It is a fabric for our children and grandchildren to cherish.
you also did not address the circumstances of said families. are we to assume this is a new welfare proposal?
additional money avail for additional children
These benefits are intended to last for 3 years.
$100 for each child they have after they receive benifits
After one year, required to work 20 hours a week.
Recipients would be required to work 20 hours per week after one year of receiving program benefits.
The basic allowance would be $1000 per family.
it was favored by 90 percent of the democrats
Additional $/year for food stamps. Far more than Policy 1.
I wish I had taken notes and compared them to disect the difference in the two policies so I could give a better opinion. I am willing to go back and maybe give a better comparison, if you want me to.
a person would have to work for 20 hrs a week which isn't a bad thing
It sounds like Barack Hussein Obama's dream.
They will get more money for extra children but not as much as policy 1.
Policy two also pays for all of your subsidies. Food, rent, whathaveyou.
supported by about 90% of Republicans, but only 10% of Democrats, calls for $1000 per month given to recipients with families of one child, with an additional $200 dollars for each additional child. These benefits are intended to last 7 years. Recipients would receive the additional benefits of $2,000 a year in food stamps. Finally, to allow for daily expenses, recipients would be given extra subsidies for housing and day care.
Do not requires the receipient to go towork.
Families receive an additional $50 per a child.
Get help, then give help to others in need.
required to work at least 20 hrs per week after 1 year
TOO MUCH MONEY TO OFFER, WHY THEY DO NOT CARE TO WORK
iT A L L SUCKS,ITBRIJGS ANYONEWITHANYCOMOMNSENSE WHERE IS THAT MONEY GOING TO COME FROM. NO ONE HAS TO BECOME RE3SPONSABLEFOR THEIR OWN ACTIONS BUTWILL BECOME PROPERTY OF THE GOV'T FORPAUMENT AND THE CHILDREN PUT ON THE FRONT LINES OF W A R ALL WITHOUT PAY FORTHEY WILL OWE THERE SOULS TO THE GOV'T
additional funds for each child plus subsidy for housing
I don't like it as it is also very socialistic.
nothing required to be paid back or work needed
The time that this program is in effect is shorter than Policy 1.
It increases entitlements at a time when current entitlements are heading towards insolvency.
The family receiving monitary benefits only had to provide aprox. 2 hours of work per week.
if i'm not healthy enough they will put me in front of the democratic death board cuz they already support the murder of babies.
They would also get extra money for housing and day care.
Don't have to do any assigned work/hours.
I disliked both plans,knew I disapprved and didn't take much time to thinks about it.
After 3 years, parent must work a minimum of 20 hours per week.
have to work 20+ hours per week after the first year
people with kids get free money and food
Additional subsidies available for rent and childcare.
RECIPIENTS WOULD REQUIERD TO WORK 20 HOURS A WEEK.
Food stamp money was more than Policy 1.
WE NEED TO STOP ILLEGAL AILIENSFROM BLEEDING THIS COUNTRY DRY-HOW MUCH OFTHIS"GIVEAWAY" IS GOING TO OUR ILLEGAL INVADERS FROM MEXICO--WILL THE GOVT. OF MEXICO "CHIP-IN" FOR THE OUTRIGHT SUPPORT OF THE PROBLEMS THEIR UN-WANTED NON-TAXPAYING GRAFT-PRONE JAIL FILLING CITIZENERY ARE COSTING US???
I think the 3 years might be a better number for someone to be on support and hopefully they could get back on their feet and not depend on the government.
required to work 20 hours after one year
Gives less money for each additional child
After 1 year, particiapants would have to work 20 hrs a week
I feel like you are trying to force me into error
I rather pass that (Policy 2) screen very quickly, as I didn't like it any better than the Policy 1 content. People ought to get off their dead butts and find a job, which did when young. It was just getting out of the "Great Depression".
The qualifying participants will be required to work 20 hours per week after 3 years.
would not have to work to continue coverage
WE DONT NEED THE GOVERNMENTS SOCIALIST PROGRAMS.
Families are required to be working 20 hours or more to receive this benefit...
can't recall, it didn't have as much impact I guess
Enough already! It's a short term help for someone to get to the point of taking care of themselves, which is important in a person's life, the ability to take care of one's self!
Okay !!I will try ..I just want the poor people to be able to live so that it isn't so hard to survive in this world and this Policy seems the best to me.
The recepient is required to work atleast 20 hours a week
added money for housing and transportation
helped with additional kids without breaking the bank
"People should oppose Policy 2 because the expenses are too high and they prefer Policy 1 with low costs."
after 1 year must work 20 hours per week
policy 2 gave family less food stamps than policy 1
more money for food stamps - $200 per month?
$500 a month for families with one child
increase in benefit for additional children
People can get extra foodstamps after several years.
additional money for each additional child
Almost as bad as the proposed Republican plan
There was no help with housing subsidies.
have to work 20 hours a week after a certain period of time
Requires work for 20 days when finished.
More money and food stamps for each additional child.
They will receive $50.00 for every additional child
The job that they find will have to employ them for at least 20 hours/week
after one year, recipients are required to work 20 hours a week
Less compensation for "sittin' on yore ass"
Benefits in Policy #2 were higher those in Poicy #1.
Only 10% Democrats voted for the policy.
i think i gave you all the fact in first question.
why should those working pay for those who wont. All have the opportunity to learn how to care for their family
For each additional child, families could receive $500.
Wasn't paying that much attention. Don't really care about politics.
After 3 years, they'll be forced to work 20 hours/week
PLAN FOR 3 YRS. AFTER ONE YEAR ,DO 20 HRS
Work would be required at least 20 hours per month.
get out of the way we do not need govement help there usless
separate allotment for monthly living expenses eg. rent
All I remember is that the people would get a lot less with policy 2.
Would receive $2,000 per year for food stamps
They could draw foodstamps after finishing rhe first program.
after 3 year thay would have to work 20 hour a week
When benefits run out, adults would be expected to work at least 20 hours a week.
After the three years, families are expected to work at least 20 hours per week.
They would receive an unspecified amount for incidental expenses.
Requires 20 hours of work per week after 1 year