Tag Archive

DA-RT [1] LATE [1] R [2] RCT [3] REF [1] academia [21] bitbucket [1] blinding [1] blog [1] budget [1] causal inference [1] causation [1] citation [1] cloward-piven [1] collaboration [1] communication [1] conferences [2] counterfactuals [1] cran [1] crowdsourcing [1] data [4] dataverse [1] democracy [1] denmark [1] description [1] effect sizes [1] engagement [1] ethics [1] europe [1] exclusion restriction [1] experiments [7] facebook [2] fractions [1] fraud [2] git [1] higher education [3] hiring [2] hypotheses [1] impact [2] inequality [1] instrumetnal variables [1] job market [4] jobs [1] journals [4] learning [1] literature [1] make [1] math [1] methods [5] mturk [2] null results [1] open access [2] open data [3] open science [9] open source [1] openness [3] package [1] pedagogy [1] peer review [8] polarization [1] policy [1] political science [17] politics [1] predatory journals [1] preregistration [2] public engagement [1] public opinion [1] publication [4] publication bias [3] publishing [7] qualitative [1] r [2] randomization [3] registration [1] replication [4] replication crisis [1] reproducibility [9] reproducible research [5] research [7] research design [1] science [6] selection [1] selective exposure [1] self-selection [1] significance [1] social media [1] social science [4] software [5] statistics [2] survey experiments [1] teaching [6] tenure [2] the politial methodologist [1] theory [1] transparency [4] treatment effect [1] uk [1] version control [1] workflow [1] writing [1]

DA-RT

• Don't Fear DA-RT

LATE

• Experiments: Always LATE

R

• Make 'make' Make Again!
• How Can I Get Started Using R?

RCT

• Treatment Self-Selection is Worth Studying Per Se
• Experiments: Always LATE
• Deaton and Cartwright miss some key features of randomized experiments

REF

• Flawed Assumptions in the Search for Research 'Impact'

academia

• Peer-Improved, Not Peer-Reviewed, Journals
• Promoting First-Generation University Graduates in Academia
• Cloward-Piven, but for Peer Review
• It's Different Over Here, and Here, and Here...
• Flawed Assumptions in the Search for Research 'Impact'
• Make 'make' Make Again!
• One Simple Step Toward Improving Academic Hiring and Recruitment
• ERPC is a Revolution, But Not for the Reason You Think
• Introducing #BeReviewer1: A Hashtag on a Mission
• Why Duplicate the Labor of Syllabus Construction?
• LSE Impact Blog: Elsevier's Purchase of SSRN
• If not for findings, then what should we reward scientists for?
• Think of Your Greatest Student!
• New Post at The Political Methodologist
• The Risks of Demanding Research Policy Impact
• Data and Software Should Be First Class Contributions
• What if 'positive' results had to be described like 'null' results?
• Are Interpretations Reproducible?
• Don't Fear DA-RT
• Would Transparency Help the Academic Job Market?
• Lessons for Academic Conferences from useR2015!

bitbucket

• Collaborating with Git and Bitbucket

blinding

• Experiments: Always LATE

blog

• New Post at The Political Methodologist

budget

• MTurkGate Is A Good Reminder To Practice Our Fractions

causal inference

• Assessing Clinton's Conflicts of Interest Requires Unobservable Counterfactuals

causation

• Assessing Clinton's Conflicts of Interest Requires Unobservable Counterfactuals

citation

• Data and Software Should Be First Class Contributions

cloward-piven

• Cloward-Piven, but for Peer Review

collaboration

• Collaborating with Git and Bitbucket

communication

• The Relevance of Social Science

conferences

• Lessons for Academic Conferences from useR2015!
• A Comment on Open Science

counterfactuals

• Assessing Clinton's Conflicts of Interest Requires Unobservable Counterfactuals

cran

• My First Project and Most Recent Publication

crowdsourcing

• MTurkGate Is A Good Reminder To Practice Our Fractions

data

• Packaging Your Reproducible Analysis
• The Surprising Value of Faking Your Data
• Data and Software Should Be First Class Contributions
• Ben, The One Simple Step To Eliminate Data Fraud

dataverse

• My First Project and Most Recent Publication

democracy

• In Defense of the Montana Experiment

denmark

• It's Different Over Here, and Here, and Here...

description

• Assessing Clinton's Conflicts of Interest Requires Unobservable Counterfactuals

effect sizes

• What if 'positive' results had to be described like 'null' results?

engagement

• The Relevance of Social Science

ethics

• Science, Social Media, and the Boundaries of Ethical Experimentation

europe

• It's Different Over Here, and Here, and Here...

exclusion restriction

• Experiments: Always LATE

experiments

• The First Mistake in Crafting Survey Experiments
• The British are Indifferent About Many Aspects of Brexit
• Treatment Self-Selection is Worth Studying Per Se
• Experiments: Always LATE
• Deaton and Cartwright miss some key features of randomized experiments
• In Defense of the Montana Experiment
• Science, Social Media, and the Boundaries of Ethical Experimentation

facebook

• What Can We Learn from 10.1 Million Facebook Users?
• Science, Social Media, and the Boundaries of Ethical Experimentation

fractions

• MTurkGate Is A Good Reminder To Practice Our Fractions

fraud

• The Surprising Value of Faking Your Data
• Ben, The One Simple Step To Eliminate Data Fraud

git

• Collaborating with Git and Bitbucket

higher education

• One Simple Step Toward Improving Academic Hiring and Recruitment
• If not for findings, then what should we reward scientists for?
• Think of Your Greatest Student!

hiring

• One Simple Step Toward Improving Academic Hiring and Recruitment
• Would Transparency Help the Academic Job Market?

hypotheses

• The First Mistake in Crafting Survey Experiments

impact

• Flawed Assumptions in the Search for Research 'Impact'
• The Risks of Demanding Research Policy Impact

inequality

• Promoting First-Generation University Graduates in Academia

instrumetnal variables

• Experiments: Always LATE

job market

• Promoting First-Generation University Graduates in Academia
• It's Different Over Here, and Here, and Here...
• One Simple Step Toward Improving Academic Hiring and Recruitment
• Would Transparency Help the Academic Job Market?

jobs

• Would Transparency Help the Academic Job Market?

journals

• Peer-Improved, Not Peer-Reviewed, Journals
• Cloward-Piven, but for Peer Review
• LSE Impact Blog: Elsevier's Purchase of SSRN
• This is What a Predatory Journal Looks Like

learning

• Think of Your Greatest Student!

literature

• Cloward-Piven, but for Peer Review

make

• Make 'make' Make Again!

math

• MTurkGate Is A Good Reminder To Practice Our Fractions

methods

• The Surprising Value of Faking Your Data
• Treatment Self-Selection is Worth Studying Per Se
• Experiments: Always LATE
• Deaton and Cartwright miss some key features of randomized experiments
• Don't Fear DA-RT

mturk

• How Can I Get Started Using R?
• MTurkGate Is A Good Reminder To Practice Our Fractions

null results

• What if 'positive' results had to be described like 'null' results?

open access

• This is What a Predatory Journal Looks Like
• A Comment on Open Science

open data

• Are Interpretations Reproducible?
• Don't Fear DA-RT
• What's in a Name? The Concepts and Language of Replication and Reproducibility

open science

• My First Project and Most Recent Publication
• Packaging Your Reproducible Analysis
• Make 'make' Make Again!
• LSE Impact Blog: Elsevier's Purchase of SSRN
• Has the Time Come for Bifurcated Peer Review?
• Ben, The One Simple Step To Eliminate Data Fraud
• What's in a Name? The Concepts and Language of Replication and Reproducibility
• Collaborating with Git and Bitbucket
• A Comment on Open Science

open source

• My First Project and Most Recent Publication

openness

• Are Interpretations Reproducible?
• Don't Fear DA-RT
• Would Transparency Help the Academic Job Market?

package

• Packaging Your Reproducible Analysis

pedagogy

• Think of Your Greatest Student!

peer review

• Peer-Improved, Not Peer-Reviewed, Journals
• Cloward-Piven, but for Peer Review
• ERPC is a Revolution, But Not for the Reason You Think
• LSE Impact Blog: Elsevier's Purchase of SSRN
• New Post at The Political Methodologist
• Data and Software Should Be First Class Contributions
• What if 'positive' results had to be described like 'null' results?
• Has the Time Come for Bifurcated Peer Review?

polarization

• What Can We Learn from 10.1 Million Facebook Users?

policy

• The Risks of Demanding Research Policy Impact

political science

• My First Project and Most Recent Publication
• Promoting First-Generation University Graduates in Academia
• It's Different Over Here, and Here, and Here...
• ERPC is a Revolution, But Not for the Reason You Think
• Introducing #BeReviewer1: A Hashtag on a Mission
• Why Duplicate the Labor of Syllabus Construction?
• What if 'positive' results had to be described like 'null' results?
• Are Interpretations Reproducible?
• Don't Fear DA-RT
• Would Transparency Help the Academic Job Market?
• Lessons for Academic Conferences from useR2015!
• Ben, The One Simple Step To Eliminate Data Fraud
• What Can We Learn from 10.1 Million Facebook Users?
• In Defense of the Montana Experiment
• Science, Social Media, and the Boundaries of Ethical Experimentation
• A Comment on Open Science
• The Relevance of Social Science

politics

• Assessing Clinton's Conflicts of Interest Requires Unobservable Counterfactuals

predatory journals

• This is What a Predatory Journal Looks Like

preregistration

• The Surprising Value of Faking Your Data
• ERPC is a Revolution, But Not for the Reason You Think

public engagement

• Flawed Assumptions in the Search for Research 'Impact'

public opinion

• The British are Indifferent About Many Aspects of Brexit

publication

• New Post at The Political Methodologist
• The Risks of Demanding Research Policy Impact
• Data and Software Should Be First Class Contributions
• Has the Time Come for Bifurcated Peer Review?

publication bias

• ERPC is a Revolution, But Not for the Reason You Think
• If not for findings, then what should we reward scientists for?
• The Risks of Demanding Research Policy Impact

publishing

• Peer-Improved, Not Peer-Reviewed, Journals
• Cloward-Piven, but for Peer Review
• ERPC is a Revolution, But Not for the Reason You Think
• LSE Impact Blog: Elsevier's Purchase of SSRN
• Data and Software Should Be First Class Contributions
• This is What a Predatory Journal Looks Like
• A Comment on Open Science

qualitative

• Don't Fear DA-RT

r

• My First Project and Most Recent Publication
• Packaging Your Reproducible Analysis

randomization

• Treatment Self-Selection is Worth Studying Per Se
• Experiments: Always LATE
• Deaton and Cartwright miss some key features of randomized experiments

registration

• New Post at The Political Methodologist

replication

• New Post at The Political Methodologist
• The Risks of Demanding Research Policy Impact
• What if 'positive' results had to be described like 'null' results?
• What's in a Name? The Concepts and Language of Replication and Reproducibility

replication crisis

• If not for findings, then what should we reward scientists for?

reproducibility

• Packaging Your Reproducible Analysis
• The Surprising Value of Faking Your Data
• Make 'make' Make Again!
• New Post at The Political Methodologist
• The Risks of Demanding Research Policy Impact
• Are Interpretations Reproducible?
• Don't Fear DA-RT
• Ben, The One Simple Step To Eliminate Data Fraud
• What's in a Name? The Concepts and Language of Replication and Reproducibility

reproducible research

• Packaging Your Reproducible Analysis
• Make 'make' Make Again!
• Are Interpretations Reproducible?
• Don't Fear DA-RT
• What's in a Name? The Concepts and Language of Replication and Reproducibility

research

• The British are Indifferent About Many Aspects of Brexit
• Flawed Assumptions in the Search for Research 'Impact'
• The Risks of Demanding Research Policy Impact
• Has the Time Come for Bifurcated Peer Review?
• What's in a Name? The Concepts and Language of Replication and Reproducibility
• In Defense of the Montana Experiment
• Science, Social Media, and the Boundaries of Ethical Experimentation

research design

• The First Mistake in Crafting Survey Experiments

science

• Cloward-Piven, but for Peer Review
• LSE Impact Blog: Elsevier's Purchase of SSRN
• If not for findings, then what should we reward scientists for?
• Has the Time Come for Bifurcated Peer Review?
• What's in a Name? The Concepts and Language of Replication and Reproducibility
• Collaborating with Git and Bitbucket

selection

• Treatment Self-Selection is Worth Studying Per Se

selective exposure

• What Can We Learn from 10.1 Million Facebook Users?

self-selection

• Treatment Self-Selection is Worth Studying Per Se

significance

• What if 'positive' results had to be described like 'null' results?

social media

• What Can We Learn from 10.1 Million Facebook Users?

social science

• The Surprising Value of Faking Your Data
• Treatment Self-Selection is Worth Studying Per Se
• Experiments: Always LATE
• Deaton and Cartwright miss some key features of randomized experiments

software

• My First Project and Most Recent Publication
• Packaging Your Reproducible Analysis
• Make 'make' Make Again!
• Data and Software Should Be First Class Contributions
• How Can I Get Started Using R?

statistics

• Assessing Clinton's Conflicts of Interest Requires Unobservable Counterfactuals
• How Can I Get Started Using R?

survey experiments

• The First Mistake in Crafting Survey Experiments

teaching

• Flawed Assumptions in the Search for Research 'Impact'
• Introducing #BeReviewer1: A Hashtag on a Mission
• Why Duplicate the Labor of Syllabus Construction?
• Think of Your Greatest Student!
• How Can I Get Started Using R?
• The Relevance of Social Science

tenure

• If not for findings, then what should we reward scientists for?
• Data and Software Should Be First Class Contributions

the politial methodologist

• New Post at The Political Methodologist

theory

• The First Mistake in Crafting Survey Experiments

transparency

• Make 'make' Make Again!
• Are Interpretations Reproducible?
• Don't Fear DA-RT
• Would Transparency Help the Academic Job Market?

treatment effect

• Experiments: Always LATE

uk

• It's Different Over Here, and Here, and Here...

version control

• Collaborating with Git and Bitbucket

workflow

• Make 'make' Make Again!

writing

• The First Mistake in Crafting Survey Experiments

Except where noted, this website is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Views expressed are solely my own, not those of any current, past, or future employer.